Report by the Director of Finance
On 18 August 2020 Cabinet will consider a revised budget for 2020/21 and
will be recommended to recommend the revised budget to Council on 8
September. The Revised Budget 2020/21 report and
proposals will be published on 10 August 2020.
The Committee is RECOMMENDED to consider and comment on
a)
the
savings set out in Annex 1 of the Revised Budget 2020/21 report to Cabinet on
18 August 2020
b)
the
revised revenue budget for 2020/21 set out in Annex 2 of the Revised Budget
2020/21 report to Cabinet on 18 August 2020
Minutes:
The
Performance Scrutiny Committee considered the Revised Budget for 2020/21.
Councillor
Ian Hudspeth, Leader of the Council, Councillor Judith Heathcoat, Deputy Leader
of the Council and Cabinet Members: Councillors David Bartholomew, Ian Corkin,
Mark Gray, Steve Harrod, Lorraine Lindsay-Gale, Lawrie Stratford, and Liam
Walker and CEDR officers attended to present the information and respond to
questions.
Councillor
Laura Price, Opposition Deputy Leader, Councillor Emma Turnbull, Shadow Cabinet
Member for Education, Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for
Children & Family Services and Councillor John Sanders, Shadoe
Cabinet Member for Environment (including Transport) commented on the revised
budget for consideration by the Performance Scrutiny Committee.
The
Committee considered the savings and revisions to the revenue budget and
commented as follows:
General
points:
A number of
Committee members and speakers expressed concern that the proposed savings
identified would not be re-instated and may result in poorer delivery of
services, particularly where this related to vacant staffing posts
Committee
members asked for an equalities impact assessment to be prepared on the budget
proposals as it was felt that there was not clear enough evidence that any
potential negative impacts on equalities had been fully considered
The
following points were raised in relation to specific Directorates savings
proposals:
Children,
Education and Families:
The
Committee noted that there is likely to be an increase in demand for Children,
Education and Family service once schools re-open in September and the
Committee remained concerned that the proposed savings may make it difficult if
there is a rise in demand. In particular, given that
the SEND Inspection had highlighted where the Council still needed to make
improvements, the Committee was particularly concerned to see any savings
proposed in this area.
Strong
concerns were expressed about the proposed £175,000 reduction of the Youth Fund
that was agreed by Council in February. Members noted that this funding had
been agreed in order to undertake a feasibility study to re-establish Council
run youth services. Whilst the Cabinet Members advised that the assessment
would still be undertaken at a reduced cost, this was not in line with the
wishes of Councillors in relation to the funding agreed by Council in February
and Members expressed concern that the work would not deliver the vision for
youth services that had been anticipated.
In
relation to the proposed Family Safeguarding Model transformation savings the
Committee noted that the service had only recently been reconfigured and
questioned why these figures were not identified as part of the last budget
setting process.
Adult
Social Care:
The
Committee queried the rationale behind reconfiguring the Didcot Area Community
Support Service and sought reassurances that this would not lead to unmet
demand or a wider reconfiguration of Community Support Services.
The
Committee also sought reassurances that care homes and care providers would be
involved in any fair cost of care exercises in relation to savings in demand
management.
Public
Health:
In
relation to vacancy management proposals, the Committee queried whether this
would potentially result in a lack of capacity within the Directorate in the
event of a second peak or moving into the winter flu season. The Committee were
reassured that the saving related to the first six months of the year and that
the vacancies were being recruited to.
The
Committee also noted that the Council is due to receive additional grant in
relation to Test and Trace and has requested a report about how this funding
will be used to create resilience across the public health system.
The
Committee AGREED that there be a report to a future meeting on the
process to be used to identify activities outside of public health that were
delivering public health related outcomes. The Committee was advised that the
public health grant could only be used for relevant activities in line with
public health grant terms and conditions.
Community
Operations:
Councillors
questioned the rationale behind delaying the implementation of Civil Parking
Enforcement. Parking enforcement is often reported as an issue of concern by
the public and as such the Committee do not wish to see any delay on the
overall project timescales.
The
Committee also sought a number of reassurances that
local road maintenance programmes and vegetation cutting programmes would not
be delayed or have funding diverted in order to support the implementation of
the Emergency Active Travel schemes.
The
Committee sought to understand whether there was likely to be an increase in
Home to School Transport costs from September onwards with staggered school
start times and the need to maintain appropriate social distancing measures.
The Committee were pleased to hear that the government has pledged an extra
c£500,000 for home to school transport costs in the Autumn Term.
Place
and Growth:
Concerns
were expressed by a number of Committee members about
the delay in implementing Local Cycling Walking and Infrastructure Plans
(LCWIPs). For the proposed scheme at Didcot, the Committee sought assurances
that officers would continue to work closely with partners as it was closely
linked to HIF funding applications.
Community
Safety:
The
Committee queried whether the proposal to delay recruitment to the traffic
enforcement team would potentially impact on HGV inspections and enforcement
and noted that there may be a reduction in impact, but the Council still
intends to carry out enforcement activity.
Customers and Organisational Development:
There
were no specific concerns raised in this particular
Directorate, but clarity was sought over terminology used in the Museums
proposal around contributions to the British Museum.
Commercial
Assets and Development:
The Committee expressed concerns over delays in implementing the Climate Action plan and requested that a report on the future of remote working and making more effective use of Council assets post-COVID-19.
Supporting documents: