Venue: County Hall, Oxford
Contact: Geoff Malcolm Tel: (01865) 815904; E-Mail: geoff.malcolm@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Election of Chairman for the Remainder of the 2011/12 Council Year |
|
|
Election of Deputy Chairman for the Remainder of the 2011/12 Council Year |
|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments |
|
|
Declarations of Interest - see guidance note |
|
|
To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 22 March 2007 (GR5) and to receive information arising from them. |
|
|
Petitions and Public Address EXEMPT ITEM It is RECOMMENDED that the public be
excluded for the duration of the item at GR7 in the Agenda since it is likely
that if they were present during the item there would be disclosure of exempt
information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act
1972 (as amended) and specified in relation to the respective items in the
Agenda and since it is considered that, in all the circumstances of each case,
the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest
in disclosing the information. THE
REPORT RELATING TO THE EXEMPT ITEM HAS NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC AND SHOULD BE
REGARDED AS STRICTLY PRIVATE TO MEMBERS AND OFFICERS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE IT. |
|
|
Pay Policy and Grading Report by Head of Human Resources (GR7). The purpose of this report is to inform
members of the proposed new pay policy which is scheduled for Council
consideration on 20 March 2012 and to provide an update on the current top
level structure of the County Council following reduction in senior management
numbers in order to meet required
financial savings. The public should be excluded during this
item because its discussion in public would be likely to lead to the disclosure
to members of the public present of information in the following prescribed
categories: 1.
Information relating to any individual; 2. Information
which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual; 3. Information
relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person
(including the authority holding that information) and since it is considered that, in all the
circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption
outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, in that such
disclosure would infringe the rights of the individual to privacy contrary to
the general law and the duty of the authority to respect human rights and to
comply with that law and contrary to the authority’s duties as a fair employer. |