Venue: County Hall
Contact: Lisa Michelson, Tel: (01865) 815673 Email: lisa.michelson@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes: Councillor Hudspeth for Councillor Sexon Councillor Brighouse for Councillor Hutchinson Apologies from Councillor Altaf-Khan, Councillor Seale, and Brenda Williams |
|
|
Declarations of Interest - see guidance note on the back page Minutes: None. |
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: Corrected misspelling for Councillor Badcock. |
|
|
Speaking to or petitioning the Committee Minutes: None. |
|
|
New Joint Commissioning Arrangements 10:15 The Committee will be joined by Sara Livadeas, Deputy Director, Joint Commissioning as well as Sarah Breton, Strategic Lead & Head of Joint Commissioning for a Q&A regarding recent changes. Minutes: The committee was
joined by Sara Livadeas, Deputy Director – Joint
Commissioning (SL) and Sarah Breton, Strategic Lead and Head of Joint
Commissioning (SB) to receive a report. Speaking to the paper, SL
described the new joint commissioning approach to Social and Community Services
and Children’s Services as well as the considerations taken to come to the new
arrangement. The ensuing discussion highlighted the fact that while the
two services appear to be quite dissimilar in terms of the amount of service
that is contracted out, the guiding principles for commissioning were the same
as well as the aim, which is to support families. The approach to joining
up would seek to remove duplication, while retaining expertise (bringing down
‘silos’ where they exist) – which the committee supported. There was also
a discussion about whether in the larger context of commissioning, if the much
small contracts for children’s services would be eclipsed by the larger adult
care contracts. SL reassured the committee that this was an important
consideration in the way the team leadership was structured. . The lead
officer for children is parallel to the lead officer for adults to ensure an
equal weight for overall service decisions. There is much to be gained
from a more coherent approach to contracting, which is currently very
fragmented, so that there is a consistent approach to service providers and
risk in this area is reduced The committee asked that Joint Commissioning return
in a year’s time after it’s been fully established. |
|
|
Capital Programme Update 10:45 Arzu Ulusoy-Shipstone, Capital, Strategy & Transformation Manager, will provide an updated position on the Capital Programme as it relates to the Children, Education and Families directorate. Minutes: Speaking to a report, Arzu Ulusoy-Shipstone, Capital, Strategy & Transformation Manager (AU-S) gave the latest position on the confirmed amounts in the capital budget. She reported that while there were sufficient funds for the Basic Maintenance and Structural Maintenance budgets, there continued to be unknown elements of the impact for national policy decisions around funding especially around the shift to academies. Roy Leach, School Organisation & Planning Manager, added that at the moment, a school’s decision to become an academy does not have an impact on investment decisions, adding that this clarification will be communicated through the Schools’ Forum. While the county council does not currently have a written policy regarding this, discussions are underway to develop one. The committee had a discussion about existing investment commitments and what changes have occurred and whether these decisions have been communicated with schools. |
|
|
Academies / Financial Implications 11:15 Simon Pickard, CEF Finance Business Partner, will give the committee an update on the financial implications of schools opting for academy status. Minutes: Simon Pickard,
Finance Business Partner for Children Education and Families (SP), along with
Andy Roberts, Interim Deputy Director - Education and Early Intervention (AR)
joined the committee for a question and answer session regarding the expected
financial impacts for recent shift in national policy towards the promotion of
academies. SP confirmed that there are financial pressures arising around
the amount of funding available per pupil in Local Authority Central Spend
Equivalent Grant (LACSEG) calculations. He described the national picture
as ‘fluctuating wildly’ around the price paid per student and said that there
were additional consultations on the horizon which contributed to the
uncertainty. However, there was a downward trend in per pupil deductions and
the Council had made accurate projections of the deductions to date, meaning
there was no immediate financial problem. The committee requested that
the costs of running an academy are made transparent in any future
consultations on Academy status. The committee also decided to explore a
possible seminar on this issue to take place later in the year for all local
elected members. Lastly, the committee asked that an upcoming paper on
this which is to be considered by the Cabinet be brought to the committee. |
|
|
Close of Meeting 12:00 Minutes: The meeting finished at 12.40. |