Venue: Room 2&3 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Contact: Richard Doney Email: scrutiny@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Link: video link https://www.youtube.com/@OxfordshirePublicMeetings
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments To receive any apologies for absence and temporary
appointments. Minutes: Apologies were received from Cllr Graham (substitute: Cllr Batstone) and from Fraser Long (co-opted member). Cllr Gawrysiak attended as a guest of the Chair and Peace Nnaji attended remotely, at the Chair’s discretion. Leah Q and Elza B also attended informally, in advance of their appointment to the Committee. |
|
|
Declaration of Interests See guidance note on the back page. Minutes: There were none. |
|
|
The Committee is recommended to APPROVE the minutes of the meetings held on 27 February, 2026, and on 12 May, 2026. Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meeting on 27 February 2026 and on 12 May 2026 were AGREED as a true and accurate record. |
|
|
Co-optee Recruitment Update The Director of Law and Governance and Monitoring Officer has
provided an update on co-optee recruitment. Minutes: The Committee considered the report and agreed to NOTE the update on activity undertaken to fill the Committee’s vacant co-optee post for a parent governor and agreed to APPOINT Leah Q and Elza B as co-opted young people members subject to each completing and submitting a Register of Interests form, for two years, from the next scheduled meeting of the Committee. |
|
|
Petitions and Public Addresses Members of the public who wish to speak on an item on the
agenda at this meeting can attend the meeting in person or ‘virtually’ through
an online connection. Requests to speak must be submitted no later than 9am
three working days before the meeting, i.e., Tuesday 23 June, 2026. Requests should be submitted to the Scrutiny Officer
at scrutiny@oxfordshire.gov.uk. If you are speaking ‘virtually’, you may submit a written
statement of your presentation to ensure that if the technology fails, then
your views can still be taken into account. A written copy of your statement
can be provided no later than 9am on the day of the meeting. Written
submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Where there are a number of requests from
persons wishing to present similar views on the same issue, the Chair may
require that the views be put by a single spokesperson. It is expected that
only in exceptional circumstances will a person (or organisation) be allowed to
address more than one meeting on a particular issue in any period of six
months. The public is reminded that the Committee is not a
decision-making body and that it cannot investigate individual
complaints. The Committee requests that no individual children are
named when addressing the Committee. Minutes: There was one public speaker, with the Chair inviting her to speak before the Best Start in Life Plan item. Dr Karen Bateson, speaking on behalf of voluntary sector
partners, welcomed the Council’s commitment to collaboration through Best Start
in Life and Family Hubs but expressed concerns that recent decisions and
engagement with the voluntary sector had not reflected the principles of trust,
transparency, co-production and shared responsibility set out in Council
strategies. The Chair invited the Cabinet member to respond to the points raised and he thanked the speaker for attending and welcomed further discussion outside the meeting. Cllr Gaul advised that collaboration between the voluntary sector and the developing Family Hub model would be discussed in more detail under the next agenda item, noting that the Council had received clear expectations from Government that Family Hubs should work closely with voluntary and community organisations. He reported that the Oxfordshire Family Alliance had recently been contacted to explore opportunities for joint working and ongoing dialogue. In relation to the Infant Parent Perinatal Service, the
Cabinet Member clarified that the service was commissioned and funded by the
NHS rather than Oxfordshire County Council. He explained that the Integrated
Care Board (ICB) had proposed withdrawing three services: the Infant Parent
Perinatal Service, the Child and Adolescent Harmful Behaviour Service, and the
Family Assessment and Safeguarding Service. He further noted that five
Oxfordshire MPs had written to the Secretary of State for Health and Social
Care requesting that the decision be reviewed and that the matter was currently
under consideration by the successor Thames Valley ICB. He emphasised that the
proposed service changes were not decisions of the County Council. |
|
|
The Committee has requested a report arising from the Joint Targeted Area Inspection carried out by Ofsted, the Care Quaility Commission, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services, and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. The inspection considered the multi-agency response to child sexual abuse in the family environment in Oxfordshire. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Carol Douch, Assistant Director Safeguarding QA Partner, and colleagues from across the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Partnership have been invited to present the report. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee had requested a report on the findings of the
Joint Targeted Area Inspection (JTAI) of the multi-agency response to child
sexual abuse in the family environment in Oxfordshire. Councillor Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young
People, attended to present the report.
He was accompanied by Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services and
Chair of the Safeguarding Children Partnership, Laurie Baker, Deputy Director
for Education and Inclusion, Annette Perrington, Strategic Lead, Carol Douch,
Deputy Director Safeguarding, Laura Gadjus, Business Manager, Lou Everatt, Head
of Oxfordshire (Probation Service), Debbie Hartick, Director of Safeguarding
(Thames Valley Integrated Care Board), Liane Lewis, Designated Nurse, Annabel
Kay, Chair of Safeguarding in Education Sub-group, Charlotte Donohoe, Head of
Specialist Safeguarding (Thames Valley Police). In introducing the report, the Cabinet Member emphasised the
gravity and sensitivity of the subject matter. He stated that the discussion
was necessarily difficult, noting that such abuse often occurred in settings
where children should be safest and was therefore particularly challenging to
identify and address. He highlighted that the inspection did not provide a
graded judgement but instead presented detailed thematic findings about system
effectiveness. He welcomed the report and the opportunity it provided to
reflect on safeguarding arrangements, placing on record his appreciation for
the work of all those working in safeguarding across the county. The Director of Children’s Services explained that the
inspection had focused specifically on child sexual abuse within the family
environment, distinguishing this from exploitation outside the home. She noted
that this form of abuse was significantly under-reported and often harder to
detect due to the absence of disclosure and the private nature of family
settings. The Director emphasised that safeguarding was a shared
responsibility across statutory partners, including the local authority, health
services, the police, and education providers, with oversight provided through
the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Partnership. She advised that, whilst the
published letter summarising the inspection’s findings, was relatively concise,
the detailed feedback provided by inspectors had been more positive,
particularly in relation to the quality and timeliness of responses where abuse
had already been identified. The Director further noted that a multi-agency action plan
was being developed in response to the inspection, with submission required
later in the summer, but that work to address identified issues had already
commenced. In discussion, the Committee discussed the following: Officers acknowledged that, whilst individual agencies held
strong datasets, integration across the system had been limited. The Deputy
Director Safeguarding confirmed that a dedicated analyst had been appointed by
the Partnership to develop a shared dashboard to provide a more comprehensive
picture of safeguarding risks. She noted
that progress had already been made although full system alignment remained
complex. Immediate changes being implemented |
|
|
Best Start in Life Plan The Committee has requested a report on the Best Start in Life Plan, which was approved by Cabinet on 19 May, 2026, and has invited Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, and Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Delia Mann, Deputy Director Childrens Social Care, Annette Perrington, Deputy Director Education and Inclusion, and Sophie Black, Assistant Director Early Help Prevention to present the report. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: This item and the following one were merged during the course of the meeting. The Committee considered the Best Start in Life Plan,
presented by the Cabinet Member for Children and Young People. He was accompanied by Lisa Lyons, Director of
Children’s Services, Laurie Baker, Deputy Director for Education and Inclusion,
Annettee Pennington, Sophie Black, Assistant Director for Early Help and
Prevention, Harriet Preedie, Targeted Youth Support Service Manager, and Jenny
Stoker, Operational Lead for Family Hubs. In introducing the item, the Cabinet Member framed the Plan
as a central strategic priority, expressing strong support for its ambition to
improve outcomes for children in their earliest years. He focused particularly
on the importance of children achieving a Good Level of Development at age
five, describing this as a critical point in determining future educational
success. Whilst acknowledging that Oxfordshire performed relatively well
overall, he highlighted a significant gap between children eligible for free
school meals and their peers. He stated that he had not been satisfied with the
level of ambition in national targets and had therefore supported the adoption
of more challenging local targets to reduce inequality more substantially. The Director of Children’s Services explained that the Plan
brought together a range of existing strategies into a single, coordinated
framework covering the period from pregnancy to school entry. She emphasised
that early years outcomes were influenced by a wide
range of factors, including health, parenting, early education and community
support, and that effective delivery required a whole-system, partnership-based
approach. She advised that governance arrangements were in place through the
Children’s Trust Board and supporting groups to ensure oversight of delivery,
performance and resource allocation. Officers further outlined the practical delivery model,
including integration with Family Hubs, early identification of need, and
investment in workforce development. They emphasised the importance of the
first 1,001 days of a child’s life and described how targeted support,
including health visiting, inclusion practitioners and early intervention
programmes, would be delivered through a coordinated system. In discussion, Members asked how the Plan would translate
into practical action. Officers provided examples including the introduction of
auto-enrolment for free school meals, which would increase take-up and direct
additional funding to schools, and the expansion of targeted early years
support. Members queried whether sufficient focus was placed on the earliest
years, including pre-school children. Officers confirmed that intervention began from pregnancy
and infancy and included childcare sufficiency from nine months, targeted
provision for two-year-olds, and support delivered through Family Hubs. The Committee asked how progress would be monitored.
Officers confirmed that targets and milestones were being developed and that
progress would be tracked through governance structures, with flexibility to
adapt approaches based on learning and data. Members raised concerns regarding uptake of free school
meals and childcare entitlements, including issues of stigma. Officers advised
that auto-enrolment and sensitive engagement with families would address this,
and that childcare sufficiency planning would ensure sufficient provision was
available. Members asked which interventions were likely to be most impactful. Officers emphasised the ... view the full minutes text for item 27/26 |
|
|
Best Start Family Hubs in Oxfordshire The Committee has requested a report on the development of Best Start Family Hubs in Oxfordshire. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, and Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Delia Mann, Deputy Director Children's Social Care, and Sophie Black, Assistant Director Early Help Prevention, have been invited to present the report. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: This item and the preceding one were merged during the course of the meeting. The Committee also considered the report on the development
of Best Start Family Hubs as a key delivery mechanism for the Best Start in
Life Plan. In introducing the item, the Cabinet Member described Family
Hubs as a significant opportunity to transform how services for children and
families were delivered, moving from a fragmented system to one that was more
integrated, accessible and responsive. He emphasised that this approach
required strong partnership working, particularly with the voluntary and
community sector, and acknowledged that this represented a substantial shift in
practice. The Director of Children’s Services outlined the proposed
model, explaining that five locality-based hubs would be established, each
supported by a network of partner organisations delivering services across the
community. She emphasised that the intention was not to replace existing
services but to bring them together in a more coherent system, ensuring
families experienced support as joined up and easy to access. Officers explained that Family Hubs would provide a
combination of universal and targeted services, including parenting support,
play and learning opportunities, health services and support for children with
additional needs. They highlighted the importance of outreach and digital
provision to ensure that services reached families who might not attend
physical sites. In discussion, Members raised concerns about partnership
working with the voluntary and community sector. Officers explained that
funding and infrastructure support would be provided to enable the sector to
deliver services and to strengthen capacity. Members asked how the model would
ensure accessibility for all communities. Officers confirmed that outreach,
local delivery through partner venues and digital provision were central to the
design. Members questioned how Family Hubs would integrate with existing
services, including youth services. Officers confirmed that the model was
designed to create a continuous 0–19 (or 25 for SEND) pathway, aligning with
youth partnerships and existing provision. Concerns were raised about long-term sustainability.
Officers confirmed that the model was designed to build on existing provision
and partnerships, supported by three-year grant funding and ongoing Council
investment. The Committee noted the report and emphasised the importance
of strong partnership working, accessibility and sustainability. The Committee AGREED to make the following
recommendation to Cabinet which applied to both the Best Start in Life Plan and
to the item on Best Start Family Hubs in Oxfordshire: |
|
|
SEND Improvement Notice Letter The Committee has requested a report on the SEND Improvement Notice letter. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, and Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Annette Perrington, Deputy Director Education and Inclusion, Laurie Baker, Deputy Director Education and Inclusion, and Deb Smit, Assistant Director SEND and Inclusion, have been invited to present the report. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee received a report on the SEND Improvement
Notice and the Council’s response. Cllr Sean Gaul attended to present the report. He was accompanied by Lisa Lyons, Director of
Children’s Services, Laurie Baker, Deputy Director for Education and Inclusion,
Annette Pennington, Strategic Lead for Education, Policy and Implementation,
and Deb Smit, Assistant Director for SEND and Inclusion. In introducing the item, the Cabinet Member acknowledged the
significance of the Improvement Notice and the broader challenges facing the
SEND system nationally. He emphasised that addressing these issues would
require sustained effort across all partners and that improvements needed to be
both immediate and sustainable. The Director of Children’s Services explained that the
Improvement Notice reflected wider system pressures, including increased
demand, rising complexity of need and financial constraints. She set out the
Council’s response, which included developing a comprehensive improvement
programme aligned with national SEND reform. Officers described work underway to strengthen governance,
improve early intervention and ensure more consistent provision across the
county. They emphasised that the aim was not only to meet the requirements of
the Improvement Notice but to create a more sustainable system overall,
reducing reliance on high-cost specialist provision and improving outcomes for
children and young people. In discussion, Members sought assurance that progress was
being made at an appropriate pace. Officers confirmed that a structured
improvement programme was underway and that governance had been strengthened to
provide clearer oversight. Members raised concerns about long-term
sustainability, and officers reiterated that reforms were intended to deliver
systemic change rather than short-term fixes. Members asked about financial pressures, particularly the
Dedicated Schools Grant deficit. Officers confirmed that this remained a
significant issue and that the SEND Reform Plan would be critical in addressing
it, including engagement with Government. The Committee noted the report, commended the work of Steve
Crocker, the Independent Chair, and all members of the SEND Improvement
Assurance Board, and agreed to continue monitoring progress as part of its
forward work programme. |
|
|
Committee Forward Work Plan The Committee is recommended to AGREE its work programme for forthcoming meetings, having heard any changes from previous iterations, and taking account of the Cabinet Forward Plan and of the Budget Management Monitoring Report. Minutes: The Committee AGREED the proposed work programme and AGREED that the November meeting should be all day in order to accommodate detailed scrutiny of the SEND Reform Plan if agreed by that point. |
|
|
Committee Action and Recommendation Tracker The Committee is recommended to NOTE the progress of previous recommendations and actions arising from previous meetings, having raised any questions on the contents. Minutes: The Committee NOTED the action and recommendation tracker. |
|
|
Responses to Scrutiny Recommendations Attached is the Cabinet responses to the Education and Young
People Overview and Scrutiny Committee reports on: - The Local Area SEND Partnership - Attainment - EOTAS - Fostering - The Virtual School The Committee is asked to NOTE the responses. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee NOTED the Cabinet responses to its recommendations. |