Venue: Room 2&3 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services email: committeesdemocraticservices@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Link: video link https://oxon.cc/DDCMTM14112024
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest See guidance below. Minutes: There were none. |
|
Questions from County Councillors Any county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the Cabinet Member’s delegated powers.
The number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time. Minutes: There were none. |
|
Petitions and Public Address PDF 182 KB Members of the public who wish to speak at this meeting can attend the meeting in person or ‘virtually’ through an online connection.
Requests to speak must be submitted by no later than 9am four working days before the meeting. Requests to speak should be sent to: committeesdemocraticservices@oxfordshire.gov.uk
If you are speaking ‘virtually’, you may submit a written statement of your presentation to ensure that if the technology fails, then your views can still be taken into account. A written copy of your statement can be provided no later than 9 am 2 working days before the meeting. Written submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Additional documents:
Minutes: There were 19 speakers registered, with some speakers speaking on multiple items.
Item 5: Proposed New Controlled Parking Zone – Iffley, Oxford - Cllr Trish Elphinstone - Cllr Brad Baines - City Cllr Ed Turner - Revd Clare Hayns - Sally Hicks
Item 6: Proposed Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) – Rose Hill, Oxford - Cllr Trish Elphinstone - City Cllr Ed Turner - Chris Heron
Item 7: Proposed Two-Way Cycling – Sheep Street, Bicester (Experimental Order) 2024 - Cllr Les Sibley - Cllr Michael Waine - Cllr Donna Ford - Town Cllr Sam Holland - Kevin Hickman - Danny Yee - Paul Troop - Robin Tucker (read out by Zuhura Plummer).
Item 8: St Clement’s, Oxford – Bus Lane - Danny Yee
Item 9: Woodstock Parking Review 2024 - Cllr Andy Graham
Item 10: Proposed Permit Bays – Bath Street, Abingdon - Robin Tucker (read out by Zuhura Plummer). - Christiane Brittain
Item 13: A4144 Woodstock Rd, Oxford- Proposed Conversion of a Zebra Crossing to Parallel Crossing - Danny Yee
Item 17: Henley: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits - Cllr Stefan Gawrysiak - Anthony Hoskins - John Norrington - Robin Tucker (on all 20mph schemes, read out by Zuhura Plummer).
Item 25: Glympton: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits - Cllr Andy Graham
Item 33: Radley: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits - Danny Yee - Nicholas Lawrence |
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 321 KB To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 10 October 2024 to be signed by the Chair as a correct record. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 10 October 2024 were approved and signed by the Chair as a correct record. |
|
Proposed New Controlled Parking Zone - Iffley, Oxford PDF 3 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/256 Contact: Vicki Neville, Senior Officer – Parking Schemes (Vicki.Neville@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT5).
RECOMMENDATION
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following measures:
a) the proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 2 hours for non-permit holders in Iffley Village A, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
b) the proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 3 hours for non-permit holders in Iffley Village B, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
c) the proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 2 hours for non-permit holders in Iffley Boarders C, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
d) permit eligibility for properties (Odd Nos.15-63) on Henley Avenue. moving them from the existing Florence Park CPZ into the new Iffley CPZ as advertised,
e) the proposals for ‘no waiting at any time’ restrictions (double yellow lines) as advertised, except for the double yellow lines near No. 28 Church Way & the proposed reduction of double yellow lines in Cavell Road,
f) include the section of Meadow Lane previously excluded from the advertised restricted area following further interaction & approval with the residents directly affected,
g) further consultation on proposals to include Annora Close, Cordrey Green, Fitzherbert Close, West View and Villiers Lane for the eligibility to apply for permits.
Minutes: The Chair stated that items 5 & 6 on the agenda would be taken together to address similar points raised.
The Chair introduced the item, invited public speakers to address the meeting and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair asked officers about the feasibility of extending the hours of operation in recommendation (b) from 3 hours to 4 hours, and whether the Church would be entitled to have business permits. Officers confirmed that the hours of operation were increased from 2 hours to 3 hours, following feedback from the consultation. Officers also noted that localised marked bays were an option for the Church and that engagement with local Councillors would continue.
The Chair confirmed that Controlled Parking Zones (CPZ’s) were the adopted policy of the County Council. It was made clear that the intention of a CPZ is to manage parking, rather than reduce parking.
The Chair noted the work being undertaken to stop dangerous parking.
Officers noted the proposals took into account the specific issues on weekends, and thus the proposed operating days of the CPZ was 7 days a week.
The Chair noted that the administration accepted opposition amendments for the 2024/25 budget to fund 4 new CPZ’s during the current financial year.
The Chair noted that CPZ’s do not stop visitor parking and do not raise revenue for the County Council.
The Chair noted that Table 2 in the report highlights the geographical differences in the balance of opinion of the proposed scheme.
The Chair noted the inclusion of Meadow Lane within the permit area as an example of officers responding to consultation responses.
Officers noted it was important to allow time for the scheme to be embedded before review so that data can be captured on all issues that arise to take forward and make changes if required. It was made clear that if there were immediate issues that needed addressing, this could be done.
The Chair explained that any Councillor or local resident could get in touch with the County Council about issues that arise.
The Chair thanked officers for their thorough report and thanked speakers for their contributions to the meeting.
The Chair agreed to the recommendations in the report, with the exception of recommendation c), which was deferred.
RESOLVED to:
Approve the following measures:
a) The proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 2 hours for non-permit holders in Iffley Village A, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
b) The proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 3 hours for non-permit holders in Iffley Village B, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
d) Permit eligibility for properties (Odd Nos.15-63) on Henley Avenue. moving them from the existing Florence Park CPZ into the new Iffley CPZ as advertised,
e) The proposals for ‘no waiting at any time’ restrictions (double yellow lines) as advertised, except for the double yellow lines near No. ... view the full minutes text for item 158/24 |
|
Proposed Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) - Rose Hill, Oxford PDF 3 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/274 Contact: Vicki Neville, Senior Officer – TRO and Parking Schemes (Vicki.Neville@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT5).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following measures:
a) the proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 2 hours for non-permit holders in Rose Hill area A, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
b) the proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders, except in signed bays in Rose Hill area B, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
c) the proposals for ‘no waiting at any time’ restrictions (double yellow lines) as advertised,
d) the proposals for ‘3 hour parking bays’ around the Rose Hill shops (part of the CPZ design for Rose Hill area B) as advertised,
e) the proposal to formalise the existing school keep clear markings on Lenthall Road & The Oval.
Minutes: The Chair stated that items 5 & 6 on the agenda would be taken together to address similar points raised.
The Chair clarified with officers if there was specific concern surrounding the primary school identified in the report. Officers noted that the CPZ was intended to try and enforce the school streets policy, and to stop parking on zig-zag lines when collecting children from school.
The Chair noted concerns from consultation respondents regarding the provision of disabled parking spaces. Officers confirmed that blue badge holders can park on single and double yellow lines.
The Chair thanked officers for their thorough report and thanked speakers for their contributions to the meeting.
The Chair agreed to the recommendations as amended, with the exception of recommendation a).
RESOLVED to:
Approve the following measures:
b) The proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders, except in signed bays in Rose Hill area B, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1,
c) The proposals for ‘no waiting at any time’ restrictions (double yellow lines) as advertised, but only in Rose Hill area B,
d) The proposals for ‘3-hour parking bays’ around the Rose Hill shops (part of the CPZ design for Rose Hill area B) as advertised,
e) The proposal to formalise the existing school keep clear markings on Lenthall Road & The Oval.
Deferred:
a) The proposals for a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Monday to Sunday 8am – 6.30pm permit holders or 2 hours for non-permit holders in Rose Hill area A, as shown in the proposal plan Annex 1. |
|
Proposed Two-Way Cycling - Sheep Street, Bicester (Experimental Order) 2024 PDF 966 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/286 Contact: Hanaii Faour, Transport Planner (Hanaii.Faour@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Economy and Place (CMDTMT8).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the introduction of an Experimental Traffic Regulation Order to permit two-way cycling throughout Sheep Street, Bicester at all times of day and days of the week and thus temporarily superseding the existing ‘no-cycling’ order
b) Request officers to continually review in detail and stop the trial if there are any pedestrian safety concerns that cannot be suitably promptly addressed.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item, invited public speakers to address the meeting and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair referred to examples of similar schemes where trials had been implemented successfully, such as in Oxford.
The Chair noted that shared spaces between pedestrians and cyclists cause concerns but referenced the limited space available.
The Chair thanked local representatives from the County, District and Town Councils for their representations and engagement.
The Director of Environment and Highways noted current violations highlighted by the local Councillor and committed to working with the parking enforcement team to address these issues as part of the scheme.
The Chair noted the holistic view that had to be taken of traffic schemes.
The Chair highlighted that the County Council had an obligation to carefully consider the impact of schemes on disabled people.
The Chair noted that opposition to the scheme came largely from people worried about conflict between pedestrians and cyclists. Officers noted that when schemes are introduced, issues that were raised previously don’t seem to have the impact that they were thought to have.
Following a question from the Chair, officers confirmed that they did not think there would be any raised danger as a result of this scheme. Officers also confirmed that alternatives for cyclists, through Manorsfield Rd, was less safe.
The Chair raised the issue of the perception of danger and noted campaigns outlined in the report to raise awareness of safe cycling to address this issue.
The Chair raised the issue of Friday’s, due to the Friday market on Sheep Street and asked officers if Friday could be treated differently. Officers confirmed that for part-time signage, an application would have to be made to the Department for Transport to assess any case.
The Chair highlighted monitoring of the scheme as a key component. Officers confirmed this point and stated that monitoring would be undertaken regularly.
The Chair noted that consultations were an opportunity for people to put forward their views and that it was important to analyse responses.
The Chair confirmed that it was County Council policy to promote the interests of pedestrians and cyclists.
The Chair noted that he wanted to agree the recommendations and add in some safeguards; including an investigation into the specific issue on Fridays and regular monitoring reports coming back to public meetings in the future. Officers clarified whether approval of the scheme as recommended would go ahead if Department for Transport approval for Friday’s as an exception was not given. The Chair confirmed this point and noted an ETRO provided opportunities for live monitoring.
The Chair thanked officers for their work, speakers for their engagement and agreed to the amended recommendations.
RESOLVED to:
a) Approve the introduction of an Experimental Traffic Regulation Order to permit two-way cycling throughout Sheep Street, Bicester at all times of day and days of the week and thus temporarily superseding the existing ‘no[1]cycling’ order.
b) Request officers to continually review in detail and stop the trial if ... view the full minutes text for item 160/24 |
|
St Clement's, Oxford - Bus Lane PDF 258 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/318 Contact: Martin Kraftl, Technical Lead – Transport Planning (Martin.Kratfl@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Economy and Place (CMDTMT9).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the making of a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) for the existing experimental westbound bus lane on St Clement’s Street and Headington Road and retain the other measures previously introduced to accommodate it as shown in Annex 1:
i. removal of the on-street parking bay between Caroline Street and Boulter Street ii. conversion of parts of the existing eastbound cycle lane from ‘mandatory’ (solid white road marking) to ‘advisory’ (dotted white road marking) iii. removal of a short section of eastbound cycle lane between Boulter Street and Bath Street, and iv. extension of existing cycle lanes in both directions at the signalled crossing west of Caroline Street by relocating the crossing zig zag markings
b) Instruct officers to review the need for the bus lane following the introduction of the trial traffic filters approved by the Council’s Cabinet in November 2022
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting, invited speakers to make their addresses and responded to their points in turn.
Officers noted that the scheme was to improve bus measures, rather than to introduce a cycle lane. Officers further commented that the traffic filters were intended to reduce traffic levels to that road space could be allocated differently, in places such as St Clement’s.
The Chair noted some of the improvements of 15-20% in bus journey times, which was welcomed.
The Chair noted support from Oxford City Council with some concerns around increased traffic flow towards the City Centre.
The Chair noted support from the bus company for the scheme.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
a) Approve the making of a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) for the existing experimental westbound bus lane on St Clement’s Street and Headington Road and retain the other measures previously introduced to accommodate it as shown in Annex 1:
i. Removal of the on-street parking bay between Caroline Street and Boulter Street ii. Conversion of parts of the existing eastbound cycle lane from ‘mandatory’ (solid white road marking) to ‘advisory’ (dotted white road marking) iii. Removal of a short section of eastbound cycle lane between Boulter Street and Bath Street, and iv. Extension of existing cycle lanes in both directions at the signalled crossing west of Caroline Street by relocating the crossing zig zag markings
b) Instruct officers to review the need for the bus lane following the introduction of the trial traffic filters approved by the Council’s Cabinet in November 2022
|
|
Woodstock Parking Review 2024 PDF 3 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/270 Contact: James Whiting, Team Leader – TRO’s and Schemes (James.Whiting@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT10).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the introduction of parking controls in Woodstock as follows:
a) The introduction of paid parking bays (with exemptions for permit holders) in areas of Cockpit Close where charges will apply 8am to 6pm (7 days a week),
b) Introduction of no waiting at anytime restrictions (double yellow lines) in sections of Cockpit Close, Rectory Lane and New Road,
c) The proposed reduction of a short section of no waiting at anytime restrictions (double yellow lines) in front of the vehicular access to No. 24 Market Street,
d) The introduction of dual-purpose parking bays for 3 hour max stay or permit holders on New Road,
e) The variation of existing permit eligibly for the Woodstock scheme to include No. 124 New Road.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting, invited speakers to make their contributions and responded to their points in turn.
Following a question from the Chair referring to the community centre, officers confirmed that additional parking bays would still allow residents to park in the 3-hour bays. Officers noted that the proposals would increase options for people parking at the community centre.
The Chair referred to several consultation responses. The Chair stated that the proposal was an example of schemes being monitored and tweaked to address issues raised.
The Chair noted the separate consultation undertaken by Woodstock Town Council, but that their proposals would have to undergo further consultation and thus, could not be decided upon during this meeting.
The Chair noted that unloading of vehicles was permitted on double-yellow lines.
The Chair thanked officers for their work, speakers for their contributions and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
Approve the introduction of parking controls in Woodstock as follows:
a) The introduction of paid parking bays (with exemptions for permit holders) in areas of Cockpit Close where charges will apply 8am to 6pm (7 days a week),
b) Introduction of no waiting at anytime restrictions (double yellow lines) in sections of Cockpit Close, Rectory Lane and New Road,
c) The proposed reduction of a short section of no waiting at any time restrictions (double yellow lines) in front of the vehicular access to No. 24 Market Street,
d) The introduction of dual-purpose parking bays for 3 hour max stay or permit holders on New Road,
e) The variation of existing permit eligibly for the Woodstock scheme to include No. 124 New Road.
|
|
Proposed Permit Bays - Bath Street, Abingdon PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/264 Contact: James Whiting, Team Leader – TRO’s and Parking Schemes (James.Whiting@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT11).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposal to replace the existing 2 hour limited waiting bays Monday to Saturday, 8am to 6pm on the east side of the B4017 Bath Street (from the junction with Letcombe Avenue to the Bath Street access path) with shared ‘2 hour limited waiting bays, Monday to Saturday, 8am to 6pm or Permit holders’, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item, invited speakers to address the meeting and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair noted that this proposal mitigated the impact of lost parking when the cycle lane was introduced.
The Chair referenced the support of two local County Councillors and Abingdon Town Council.
Officers confirmed that residents will have virtual permits so that the registration numbers will be in the hand-held devices of enforcement officers.
The Chair thanked officers for their work, speakers for their contributions and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
a) Approve the proposal to replace the existing 2 hour limited waiting bays Monday to Saturday, 8am to 6pm on the east side of the B4017 Bath Street (from the junction with Letcombe Avenue to the Bath Street access path) with shared ‘2 hour limited waiting bays, Monday to Saturday, 8am to 6pm or Permit holders’, as advertised. |
|
Highway Improvement Works - A417 Faringdon Road, Stanford in the Vale PDF 3 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/279 Contact: Daniel Mowlem, Senior Officer – Placemaking (Daniel.Mowlem@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT12).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following highway improvements on the A417 Faringdon Road, as advertised:
a) 30mph speed limit – extend the existing 30mph speed north-westwards, replacing the existing 40mph speed limit in its entirety in the process,
b) Toucan crossing – to be located approx. 65 metres southeast of its junction with Joyce Road,
c) Shared-use foot & cycleways located on the east & west side either side of the proposed crossing.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted that the proposal was put forward as a result of planning conditions.
The Chair welcomed the high level of consultation responses and that there was consultation with properties involved alongside standard consultees.
The support from local bus companies was noted by the Chair.
Officers confirmed that their opinion was that extra crossings would decrease speed and be safer for residents.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
Approve the following highway improvements on the A417 Faringdon Road, as advertised:
a) 30mph speed limit – extend the existing 30mph speed north-westwards, replacing the existing 40mph speed limit in its entirety in the process,
b) Toucan crossing – to be located approx. 65 metres southeast of its junction with Joyce Road,
c) Shared-use foot & cycleways located on the east & west side either side of the proposed crossing.
|
|
Proposed Prohibition of Motor Vehicles - Cornhill Lane BOAT, East Challow PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/281 Contact: Steven Tabbitt, Team Leader – Countryside Access (Steven.Tabbitt@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT13).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the prohibition of motor vehicles & horse drawn carriages from using Cornhill Lane Byway Open to All Traffic [BOAT] in East Challow, as advertised.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
Officers confirmed the order was being proposed for safety reasons.
Officers noted that they were trying to keep it open for as many stakeholders as possible but would ban those motorised vehicles that cause damage.
Officers noted there would be regular monitoring to address any issues.
Following a question from the Chair, officers noted that photographic evidence pointed to the fact that the response was not a sudden reaction.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
a) Approve the prohibition of motor vehicles & horse drawn carriages from using Cornhill Lane Byway Open to All Traffic [BOAT] in East Challow, as advertised. |
|
Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/304 Contact: Robert Freshwater, Infrastructure Development Lead (Robert.Freshwater@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT13).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the change of design from an approved zebra crossing to a parallel crossing with shared use facilities on Woodstock Road, Oxford.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item, invited speakers to address the meeting and responded to their points in turn.
Following a question from the Chair regarding co-production, officers confirmed that there was a co-production process which involved stakeholders, including the bus companies; but that this could have been a more extensive process.
Officers pointed out there were slightly different provisions depending on the direction of travel and where you needed to get to.
There was discussion between the Chair and officers over the practicalities of the scheme.
The Chair noted that the scheme was an improvement on the current provision.
The Chair thanked officers for their work, speakers for their contributions and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
a) Approve the change of design from an approved zebra crossing to a parallel crossing with shared use facilities on Woodstock Road, Oxford. |
|
Didcot Road, Harwell Link Road Roundabout, Didcot - Proposed Pegasus Crossings PDF 942 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/303 Contact: Ryan Moore, Technical Lead Engineer – South & Vale (Ryan.Moore@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT15).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following crossings, as advertised:
a) Pegasus crossings on: i. New Southern site access road, approx. 30 metres southeast of its roundabout junction with the B4493/Harwell Link Road, ii. B4493 Didcot Road, approx. 30 metres west of its roundabout junction with the Harwell Link Road, iii. New Northern site access road, approx. 70 metres north of the roundabout junction with the B4493/Harwell Link Road.
b) Toucan crossing on the Harwell Link Road, located approx. 30 metres south of its roundabout junction with the B4493 Didcot Road
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair clarified the different types of crossings.
The Chair referenced some of the objections in the consultation responses.
Officers disagreed with responses that stated the scheme would increase safety concerns.
The Chair noted the support of local councillors.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
Approve the following crossings, as advertised:
a) Pegasus crossings on: i. New Southern site access road, approx. 30 metres southeast of its roundabout junction with the B4493/Harwell Link Road, ii. B4493 Didcot Road, approx. 30 metres west of its roundabout junction with the Harwell Link Road, iii. New Northern site access road, approx. 70 metres north of the roundabout junction with the B4493/Harwell Link Road.
b) Toucan crossing on the Harwell Link Road, located approx. 30 metres south of its roundabout junction with the B4493 Didcot Road
|
|
Proposed 40mph Speed Limit - Wantage Eastern Link Road, Kingsgrove PDF 1018 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/293 Contact: Dan Hammond, Senior Project Manager – Project Delivery (Dan.Hammond@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT16).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the 30mph & 40mph speed limits on the ‘Wantage Eastern Link Road’ (King Alfred Way), as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted that this was a new road to support the new development and to support the ambition of removing traffic from Wantage Town Centre.
The Chair referenced support from the bus companies.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the 30mph & 40mph speed limits on the ‘Wantage Eastern Link Road’ (King Alfred Way), as advertised. |
|
Proposed 40mph Limit - Asthall - A40 / B4047 PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/285 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following speed limit changes, as advertised:
a) 40mph speed limits: i. A40 Burford-Witney Road – between a point 325 metres west of its junction with the B4047 Burford Road roundabout, and on the dual-carriageway to a point 140 metres east of the roundabout (including its circulatory carriageway), ii. B4047 Burford Road – from its junction with the A40 Asthall roundabout eastwards for a distance of 185 metres, iii. The unnamed road running north towards Asthall – from its junction with the B4047 Burford Road, northwards for a distance of 140 metres.
b) 50mph speed limit: i. A40 Oxford Road – between the Burford 40mph speed limit and the proposed 40mph speed limit on the approach to the A40 / B4047 Asthall Road roundabout, as described in a) above.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted support from Asthall and Brize Norton parish councils, which was welcomed, and stated that objections were covered in the report.
The Chair referenced a generic response that came up several times in the agenda objecting to the schemes, but it was noted that the schemes put forward were part of the adopted policy of the County Council.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED to:
Approve the following speed limit changes, as advertised:
a) 40mph speed limits: i. A40 Burford-Witney Road – between a point 325 metres west of its junction with the B4047 Burford Road roundabout, and on the dual-carriageway to a point 140 metres east of the roundabout (including its circulatory carriageway), ii. B4047 Burford Road – from its junction with the A40 Asthall roundabout eastwards for a distance of 185 metres, iii. The unnamed road running north towards Asthall – from its junction with the B4047 Burford Road, northwards for a distance of 140 metres.
b) 50mph speed limit: i. A40 Oxford Road – between the Burford 40mph speed limit and the proposed 40mph speed limit on the approach to the A40 / B4047 Asthall Road roundabout, as described in a) above. |
|
Henley: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 2 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/186 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the introduction of the amended 20mph speed limits in Henley-on-Thames as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair noted the following general points in respect of the County Council’s 20mph policy:
- Monitoring impacts showing reductions in accidents in Wales. - Thames Valley Police can and do monitor speed limits in 20mph zones. - The impact of 20mph speed limits on reducing insurance claims. - Objections because they want schemes to go further.
The Chair noted responses from the bus companies relating to interventions on the highways networks not benefitting buses. The Chair noted he felt this was not true and officers agreed.
The Chair introduced the item, invited speakers to make their points and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair noted the application of policy regarding the radial routes compared with residential routes outlined in the map in the report.
The Chair noted the support from Oxford Bus Company and pointed the scheme out as an example of the process working.
The Chair thanked officers for their work, speakers for their contributions and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the introduction of the amended 20mph speed limits in Henley-on-Thames as advertised. |
|
Besselsleigh: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 774 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/185 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT18).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Besselsleigh, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the support from the parish meeting.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Besselsleigh, as advertised. |
|
Bloxham: 20 Mph Speed Limit Scheme Review PDF 615 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/078 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT20)
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following speed limits, as advertised:
a) 20mph speed limit on Bloxham Grove Road, b) 30mph speed limit on Ells Lane.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted support from the local Parish and District Councils.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
Approve the following speed limits, as advertised:
a) 20mph speed limit on Bloxham Grove Road, b) 30mph speed limit on Ells Lane. |
|
Burford: Shilton Rd - Proposed 20mph Speed Limit PDF 844 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/182 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT21).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits on Shilton Road and Signet End, Burford as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted support for the scheme from the local Town Council and Oxfordshire Cycling Network.
The Chair referred to consultation responses regarding making journeys to school safer.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits on Shilton Road and Signet End, Burford as advertised. |
|
Claydon: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 847 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/179 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT22).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Claydon, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair stated that the principles of the scheme had been clearly implemented as per the map in the report.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Claydon, as advertised. |
|
Clifton Hampden: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/190 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT23).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Clifton Hampden, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair referred to a written statement in support of the scheme.
The Chair referred to the concerns raised by consultees regarding Burcot.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Clifton Hampden, as advertised. |
|
Denchworth: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/124 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT24).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Denchworth, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting, thanked officers for their work and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Denchworth, as advertised.
|
|
Grafton - Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 491 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/308 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT25).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Grafton, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the support from the local parish meeting.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Grafton, as advertised.
|
|
Glympton: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 497 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/181 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT26).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Glympton, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item, invited speakers to make their addresses and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair noted the support from the local County Councillor.
The Chair noted the level of objections in the consultation but felt officers had responded to concerns.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Glympton, as advertised.
|
|
Hailey - Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 856 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/307 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT27).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hailey, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the written statement of support from Witney Town Council.
The Chair asked officers about differential speed limits outside schools, to which officers confirmed that they were not, but also noted advisory signs that were present.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hailey, as advertised.
|
|
Hampton Gay & Poyle: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 611 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/154 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT28).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hampton Poyle, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the support from the parish meeting for the scheme.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hampton Poyle, as advertised. |
|
Hook Norton: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 986 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/143 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT29).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hook Norton, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair referred to responses from the bus companies regarding road safety due to the narrow width of the road.
The Chair referred to several of the consultation responses.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hook Norton, as advertised.
|
|
Hornton: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 517 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/120 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT30).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hornton, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting, thanked officers for their work and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Hornton, as advertised.
|
|
Horspath: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 2 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/122 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT30).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following proposals, as advertised:
a) 20mph speed limit in Horspath, b) 40mph speed limit on the Horspath Road/Oxford Road.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair referenced several of the consultation responses.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
Approve the following proposals, as advertised:
a) 20mph speed limit in Horspath, b) 40mph speed limit on the Horspath Road/Oxford Road. |
|
Little Tew: Proposed 20mph Speed Limit PDF 447 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/309 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT32).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Little Tew, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair referenced consultation responses from TVP and the bus companies.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Little Tew, as advertised. |
|
Mapledurham: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 540 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/306 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT33).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Mapledurham, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting, thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Mapledurham, as advertised. |
|
Radley: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 836 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/171 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT35).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Radley, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item, invited speakers to make their addresses and responded to their points in turn.
The Chair and officers discussed further measures that could be implemented surrounding the new housing developments in and around Radley.
The Chair asked for officers to keep the scheme under review and to remain in touch with the parish council about issues raised.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Radley, as advertised.
|
|
Sandford on Thames - Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 2 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/305 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT36).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Sandford-on-Thames, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair asked officers if there was justification for Sandford Rd not fully having 20mph speed limits, and officers agreed that there was.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Sandford-on-Thames, as advertised. |
|
Stanford-in-the-Vale: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 1 MB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/170 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT37).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Stanford in the Vale, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair welcomed the level of consultation response.
The Chair stated that the map showed a clear application of policy.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Stanford in the Vale, as advertised. |
|
Stadhampton: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 924 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/123 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT38).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
Approve the following speed limits, as advertised.
a) 20mph speed limit in Stadhampton,
b) 20mph speed limit in Chiselhampton on the B480 Oxford to Stadhampton road, and the B4015 Clifton Hampden Road,
c) 30mph speed limit on the B480 between Stadhampton & Chiselhampton.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the differences in opinion between Stadhampton and Chiselhampton.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
Approve the following speed limits, as advertised.
a) 20mph speed limit in Stadhampton,
b) 20mph speed limit in Chiselhampton on the B480 Oxford to Stadhampton road, and the B4015 Clifton Hampden Road,
c) 30mph speed limit on the B480 between Stadhampton & Chiselhampton.
|
|
Stoke Row: Proposed 20mph Speed Limits PDF 497 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/176 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT39).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Stoke Row, as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
The Chair noted the objections and officers confirmed their responses were covered in the report.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits in Stoke Row, as advertised. |
|
Tetsworth: 20mph Speed Limits PDF 397 KB Cabinet Member: Transport Management Forward Plan Ref: 2024/320 Contact: Anthony Kirkwood, Vision Zero Team Leader (Anthony.Kirkwood@oxfordshire.gov.uk)
Report by Director of Environment and Highways (CMDTMT38).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits at Tetsworth as advertised.
Minutes: The Chair introduced the item to the meeting.
Officers and the Chair noted that this item had returned after a deferral in July after further discussion with the parish council and bus companies.
The Chair thanked officers and agreed to the recommendations in the report.
RESOLVED:
a) Approve the proposed introduction of 20mph speed limits at Tetsworth as advertised. |