Venue: County Hall, New Road, Oxford
Contact: Graham Warrington Tel: (01865) 815321; E-Mail: graham.warrington@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Declarations of Interest - see guidance note opposite Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting
held on 5 March 2012 were approved and signed by the Chairman. 4/12 – Chairman’s Updates Waterstock Mr
Dance advised that in January the High Court had demanded a specification for
the removal of waste. That had been
received mid February but had proved to be inadequate. To date no waste had been removed. The County Council had applied for a further Court
hearing date with the same judge. Ardley
Energy from Waste Mr
Dance advised that groundwork construction had commenced and pre- commencement
conditions cleared. CCTV had been
installed to monitor vehicle movements particularly through Ardley
village. The liaison meeting had been
expanded to take account of the EfW development with
a second meeting scheduled for 6 March 2012. Ashgrove
Farm Agrivert
had made further revisions to the odour management plan to meet concerns from
the Environment Agency although the Agency were still unhappy with certain elements of it and would
be contacting Agrivert shortly to discuss those issues. The Plan would not be signed off without
Agency support. The Agency were also
carrying out a further audit of the site and its operation. Officers considered that ultimately the Agency
would be looking for less waste to go through the plant thereby encouraging
better management. Ultimately the Agency
could take enforcement action. In
response to complaints regarding the County Council’s handling of issues of
odour management an independent investigation had identified that a much
tighter approach was required to make conditions more enforceable and avoid
duplication with other agencies. Mrs
Fulljames welcomed this news. Referring to local concerns
that lines of responsibility had not been clear she hoped this would improve matters. 6/12 - Sutton Courtenay material for
block making – Application 11/02440/CM Work
on the drainage scheme had progressed with consultation ending on 1 March. Officers would be meeting with WRG on 6 March
when this issue would be discussed.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Order of Business Minutes: RESOLVED: that Items 8 and 9 be taken immediately after Item 4 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Commons Act 2006: Delegation of decision-making powers to officers Report by County Solicitor and Director for Environment & Economy (PN8). The Commons Act 2006 section 15(8) introduced a new power for a landowner to apply for voluntary registration of its own land as a town or village green using a simple statutory procedure. There are presently no officer delegations in relation to decisions under the Commons Act 2006, which at present must be determined by the Planning & Regulation Committee. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to delegate to the Director for
Environment & Economy the power to determine applications for registration
of new town or village greens under section 15(8) of the Commons Act 2006,
provided always that:- (a)
satisfactory evidence is obtained that the criteria set out in
Regulation 7 of the Commons (Registration of Town or Village Greens) (Interim
Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2007 are met; (b)
all statutory provisions are complied with and departmental
guidance is taken into account where necessary; (c)
legal advice from the County Solicitor is obtained and taken into
account where necessary. Additional documents: Minutes: The Commons Act 2006 introduced a new power for a landowner to apply for voluntary registration of its own land as a town or village green using a simple statutory procedure. The Committee considered a proposal to delegate to the Director for environment & Economy the power to determine such applications subject to certain provisions. RESOLVED: (on a
motion by Councillor Armitage, seconded by Councillor
Hayward and carried unanimously) to delegate to the Director for
Environment & Economy the power to determine applications for registration
of new town or village greens under section 15(8) of the Commons Act 2006,
provided always that:- (a)
satisfactory evidence had been obtained
that the criteria set out in Regulation 7 of the Commons (Registration of Town
or Village Greens) (Interim Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2007 had been met; (b)
all statutory provisions had been
complied with and departmental guidance taken into account where necessary and
no prior objections from any third party with an interest in the land were
outstanding; (c)
legal advice from the County Solicitor had
been obtained and taken into account where necessary. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to delegate to the Director for
Environment & Economy the power to determine applications for registration
of new town or village greens under section 15(8) of the Commons Act 2006,
provided always that:- (d)
satisfactory evidence is obtained that
the criteria set out in Regulation 7 of the Commons (Registration of Town or
Village Greens) (Interim Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2007 are met; (e)
all statutory provisions are complied
with and departmental guidance is taken into account where necessary ; and no prior objections from any third party with an interest in the
land are outstanding (f)
legal advice from the County Solicitor
is obtained and taken into account where necessary. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Report by County Solicitor & Head of Legal and Democratic Services (PN9) In June 2011 an
application was made by Mr William Clark for registration of land known as the
Blackbird Leys Park Park, Blackbird Leys, Oxford in
Oxfordshire as a Town or Village Green under the Commons Act 2006. The land is
owned in part by the Oxford City Council and in part by the Oxfordshire County
Council. The County
Council is the Commons Registration authority with statutory responsibility for
determining such applications. Objections were
received by the Commons Registration Authority to the application and legal
advice was obtained from a specialist barrister in relation to a preliminary
issue. In light of that advice, this report sets out a recommendation to the
Council. There are no delegated powers to officers to
determine such an application and therefore the Planning & Regulation Committee
is required to determine the application. Having received the Further Opinion of
Counsel set out in Annex 2 to this report, the Committee is RECOMMENDED to
REJECT the application for registration as a new Town or Village Green that
plot of land known as Blackbird Leys Park, Blackbird Leys, Oxford in
Oxfordshire that site being indicated clearly on the Application Map of the
application submitted by Mr William Clark and dated 6 June 2011. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered an application for the registration of land known as Blackbird Leys Park as a Town or Village Green in the light of legal advice obtained from a specialist barrister in relation to a preliminary issue following objections received to the application. Councillor Tanner left the room for the duration of the item. Sarah Lasenby advised that the applicants no longer wished to withdraw their objection and asked the Committee to defer consideration of the application pending the outcome of the Barkas case. Mr Clark advised that this site was owned by the people of Oxford City and the City Council as trustees of the site had a position of responsibility to manage and administer the site and offer protection from encroachment of grassed areas. Proposals to erect a swimming pool on the site were misdirected – it would be sited in a most aggressive area fronting Pegasus Road on a known floodplain with an inadequate road infrastructure affecting parking, disruption to bus traffic and increased safety risks at nearby school on Pegasus Road. The nature of the site was woefully inadequate to accommodate development and a decision on the town and village green application should be deferred pending the result of the Barkas case. Mr Goodlad advised that the central point of the judgement had been that use of the land had not been as of right. That was a fundamental requirement of such an application and the use of land needed to be looked at in an historical sense and not any future use. The view of Counsel had been that the decision in the Barkas case was binding on this authority. RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Armitage,
seconded by Councillor Mrs Fulljames and carried
unanimously) that in the light of the Further
Opinion of Counsel set out in Annex 2 to the report PN9 that the application
for registration as a new Town or Village Green of that plot of land known as
Blackbird Leys Park, Blackbird Leys, Oxford in Oxfordshire and being indicated
clearly on the Application Map of the application submitted by Mr William Clark
and dated 6 June 2011 be rejected. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Report by the Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN5) The report
describes why the school are applying to renew planning permission, outlines
the objection received and other responses to the application and sets out relevant
planning policies along with the comments and recommendation of the Deputy
Director for Environment & Economy (Growth and Infrastructure). It is RECOMMENDED that Application No. R3.0010/12 be approved subject to conditions to be
determined by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth &
Infrastructure) but to include the following matters: 1.
The development must be
carried out strictly in accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with
the application. 2.
Building to be removed
by 31 March 2017. 3.
Repainting of external
doors, walls and railings within 6 months. School Accommodation Informative: The school is advised to investigate the provision of a more permanent
solution to its long-term accommodation needs before this consent expires. Minutes: The Committee considered an application to renew planning permission for a single temporary classroom unit. Councillor Tanner expressed some sympathy with the view of the Bicester Town Council and moved that the officer recommendation be approved but with permission granted for 3 years and not 5. There was no seconder and the motion fell. RESOLVED: that Application
No. R3.0010/12 be approved subject to
conditions to be determined by the Deputy Director for Environment &
Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) but to include the following matters: 1.
The development must be
carried out strictly in accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with
the application. 2.
Building to be removed
by 31 March 2017. 3.
Repainting of external
doors, walls and railings within 6 months. School Accommodation Informative: The school be advised to investigate the provision of a more permanent
solution to its long-term accommodation needs before this consent expired. RESOLVED:
that
Application No. R3.0010/12 be approved
subject to conditions to be determined by the Deputy Director for Environment
& Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) but to include the following
matters: 4.
The development must be
carried out strictly in accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with
the application. 5.
Building to be removed
by 31 March 2017. 6.
Repainting of external
doors, walls and railings within 6 months. School Accommodation Informative: The school is advised to investigate the provision of a more permanent
solution to its long-term accommodation needs before this consent expires. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Report by Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN6) The report
describes the proposal to extend the Children’s Centre at Eynsham
Primary School, outlines the four objections
and other responses which have been received to the application and sets out relevant planning policies along with the
comments and recommendation of the Deputy Director (Growth and Infrastructure). It is RECOMMENDED that Application No.
R3.0018/12 be approved subject to conditions to be determined by the Deputy
Director (Growth & Infrastructure) to include the following matters: 1.
The development be carried out strictly in
accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with the application. 2.
Temporary permission – building to be removed in 5
years. 3.
External materials to be agreed. 4.
Travel plan to be updated 5.
Drainage to be approved prior to occupation of the
building. 6.
Landscaping to be approved prior to development
taking place. Minutes: The Committee considered an application to extend the Children’s Centre at Eynsham Primary School together with further representations from the applicant regarding the condition requiring removal of the building after 5 years. In response to concerns expressed regarding the adequacy of the level of toilet provision officers confirmed that the applicants were satisfied with the current provision. RESOLVED: (on a motion by
Councillor Tanner, seconded by Councillor Lilly and carried unanimously) that
Application No. R3.0018/12 be approved subject to conditions to be determined
by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth &
Infrastructure) to include the following matters: 1.
The development be
carried out strictly in accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with
the application. 2.
Temporary permission –
building to be removed in 5 years. 3.
External materials to be
agreed. 4.
Travel plan to be
updated 5.
Drainage to be approved
prior to occupation of the building. 6.
Landscaping to be
approved prior to development taking place. RESOLVED: (
) that Application No. R3.0018/12 be approved subject to conditions to be
determined by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth &
Infrastructure) to include the following matters: 7.
The development be
carried out strictly in accordance with the plans and drawings submitted with
the application. 8.
Temporary permission –
building to be removed in 5 years. 9.
External materials to be
agreed. 10.
Travel plan to be
updated 11.
Drainage to be approved
prior to occupation of the building. 12.
Landscaping to be
approved prior to development taking place. |