Venue: County Hall
Contact: Graham Warrington Tel: (01865) 815321; E-Mail: graham.warrington@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments |
|
|
Declarations of Interest - see guidance note opposite |
|
|
To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 14 September 2009 and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom |
|
|
Petitions and Public Address |
|
|
Planning Applications for Energy from Waste Incinerators - Covering Report The
following two reports 5(a) and 5(b) set out two separate planning applications
for energy from waste incinerators: by Viridor at Ardley and by Waste Recycling Group at Sutton
Courtenay. The covering report sets out
some common background between the two proposals, in terms of the reasons why
the applications have been submitted now, the drivers behind the need to divert
residual waste from landfill, the planning policy context and in terms of the regulatory process
involved. Application
For: (a) The
Construction and Operation of an Energy from Waste (EfW)
Facility together with Associated Office, Visitor Centre and Bottom Ash
Recycling Facilities, New Access Road and Weighbridge Facilities and the
Continuation of Non Hazardous Landfill Operations and Landfill Gas Utilisation
with Consequent Amendments to the Phasing and Final Restoration Landform of the
Landfill, Surface water Attenuation Features and Improvements to the Exisiting Household Recycling Facility at Ardley Landfill Site, Ardley
Fields farm, Ardley – Application 08/02472/CM Report by the Head of
Sustainable Development (PN5(a)) This is
an application for an Energy from Waste (EfW) facility and associated
development together with changes to the landfill operation and improvements to
the existing household recycling facility (HWRC) at Ardley landfill site. The proposed facility would process 300,000
tonnes of municipal and commercial and industrial waste per year. The waste is
proposed to come primarily from within Oxfordshire together with some from
adjoining counties. The EfW building would be 229 metres long with a maximum
width of 70 metres and a maximum height of 36 metres. The chimney stack would be 82 metres high. The key
planning issues are site specific waste policy and management issues, strategic
location of the EfW plant against planning/transport criteria for waste
management facilities, landscape and countryside impacts and amenity/impacts on
local people. There are some policy and
other matters that are common to this application and to the Sutton Courtenay
EfW application. The covering report to both of these proposals addresses these
issues. It explains the context within which the need for waste management facilities
to divert waste from landfill arises. The
application has attracted many responses from local people that raise a range
of concerns. The report takes all of these views into account together with
those received from consultees and other interested parties. The
development broadly accords with waste management policy as it proposes a
facility to deal with Oxfordshire’s residual waste within the county. However,
there is conflict with policies which seek to prevent permanent built
development in the countryside. The proposal would have impacts on local
amenity but it is possible to limit these. The
report concludes that the need for a waste treatment facility to serve
Oxfordshire, and the appropriateness of the location in relation to the
strategic road network, outweighs the conflict with policies relating to
landscape and countryside. It
is RECOMMENDED that: (a) subject to legal agreements to cover the
following matters: (i)
limitation on waste import to the site from
outside the County to allow:- Additional documents: |
|
|
Report by Head of Sustainable
Development (PN6). This application is made by Oxfordshire County Council (as the waste disposal authority) to retain an existing Household Waste Recycling Centre at Dean Pit, Chadlington for a further period of five years until 30 September 2014. The current planning permission expires on 30 September 2009. No changes to the current operations at the site or its hours of opening are proposed. Objections to the application have been received on the grounds that: the site is inappropriate within the AONB; the site impacts on the amenity of neighbouring residents; the local highway network is inappropriate to serve the site and alternative sites are available and have not been assessed. Full details of these objections and the comments of other consultees are summarised in the report. The Committee is
RECOMMENDED to approve Application Number R3.0125/09 for the extension of
temporary consent for continued use of site as a waste recycling centre until
30 September 2014, subject to conditions to be determined by the Head of
Sustainable Development to include the following matters: 1. That
the development must be carried out strictly in accordance with the particulars
contained in the application and the plans accompanying subject to conditions
below. 2. Temporary
permission – that at the expiration of a period ending on 30 September 2014 the
use specified be discontinued. The site shall be restored to agricultural use
by 30 September 2016. 3. Hours
of use – the hours of use of the site shall be restricted to the following
times: ·
Operating hours to be between the hours of
7.30am to 8.30pm (1 April – 30 September) ·
Public opening hours to be between the hours
of 8.00am to 8.00pm (1 April – 30 September) ·
Operating hours to be between the hours of
7.30am to 5.30pm (1 October – 31
March) ·
Public opening hours to be between the hours
of 8.00am to 5.00pm (1 October – 31 March) No
operations on Christmas Day, Boxing Day or New Year’s Day. 4. That
the details of the routes used by Heavy Goods Vehicles accessing the site shall
be submitted to and approved by the Head
of Sustainable Development in consultation with Transport Development Control
within one month of the date of this permission. 5. Landscaping
– that a scheme for replacement tree and shrub planting on the western boundary
of the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Head of Sustainable
Development within 1 month of the date of this permission. 6. Landscaping
implementation – that all planting comprised in the approved details of
landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting season following the
date of this permission. Minutes: The
Committee considered (PN6) an application to retain an existing Household Waste
Recycling centre at Dean Pit, Chadlington for a
further period of 5 years until 30 September 2014. Adrian
Tremlett (Chadlington
Parish Council) referred to the impact of this site on local communities. It was generally accepted that waste
operations such as this one were better sited near large centres of population
whereas this site was in a rural area served by narrow single carriageway roads
through small villages. The site
accepted a large percentage of green waste which needed to be transferred for composting
elsewhere. Furthermore as the site was
in the AONB there was a responsibility to show that no alternative site was
available and this had not been done. He
asked the Committee to protect local interests and reject the application. Lord
Chadlington accepted provision of such facilities was
essential but this site was not suitable.
There had been a lot of opposition expressed to this extension and he
advised that following restoration of the former landfill site this was now a
Greenfield site. This was the fourth
renewal, which suggested that the County Council should be looking for an
alternative site but that did not seem to be the case. He accepted that the site was well used but
if no alternative sites were being considered that would always be the case. To
extend the permission for a further 5 years flew in the face of current
policies and he urged that an alternative site in a more convenient location
with safer access outside the AONB should be found. Responding
to questions from members of the Committee Mr Pickard confirmed that no
alternative sites had been considered and advised that he had not been aware
that there had been that number of renewals.
An extension was required as the current permission expired on 30
September. He further advised that it
could take 2 to 3 years to find an alternative site. Councillor
Owen expressed concern that no alternative sites had been considered and over
the number of extensions to this temporary permission. Although there had been no real objection to
this facility 20 years ago the traffic impact was now so serious it presented a
real safety risk and roads locally were deteriorating. He moved that the officer recommendation be
approved subject to the extension of the temporary consent being reduced to
three years and any further permission to exclude the words “where there is a
need for the facility”. The
motion was seconded by Councillor Seale. Councillor
Owen with the agreement of his seconder then accepted
an amendment by Councillor Sanders seconded by Councillor Hannaby
that temporary consent be granted for two years and not three. The
substantive motion was then put to the Committee and it was – RESOLVED (13 votes to 1) to approve Application Number R3.0125/09 for the extension of temporary consent for continued use of the Dean Pit, Chadlington Household Waste Recycling centre until 30 September 2011, subject to ... view the full minutes text for item 58/09 |
|
|
Report by Head of Sustainable
Development (PN7) This
is a retrospective application seeking consent for a compound for the storage
of building supplies and for the import of aggregate at Horsehay
Quarry, Duns Tew. These activities are carried out in
association with the permitted sand extraction at the quarry and are proposed
to be temporary for the life of the quarry. There have been no objections from
local residents to the proposal but the application is being reported to this
committee as Cherwell District Council have objected. The grounds of objection
are that they do not consider it to be
necessary for the activities to be carried out by the quarry and it results in
a new employment generating site in an unsustainable location. The report
outlines the objection along with the other consultation responses
received. The existing routeing
agreement attached to this site is to be retained. The conclusions of the Head of Sustainable
Development, taking account of the representations received, and relevant
development plan policies are included. It is RECOMMENDED
subject to compliance with the existing routeing arrangement that planning
permission for application 09/01105/CM 09/0996/P/CM
be granted subject to conditions to be determined by the Head of Sustainable
Development but to include those matters set out below: 1.
Detailed compliance is in
complete accordance with plans and particulars 2.
Detailed duration -
development to commence within 3 years 3.
Development to end at the same
time as the quarry operations – 2018 4.
A 15 metre stand-off area
between the storage and processing activities and the geological features of
interest to be agreed and implemented. 5.
Stockpiles of imported
aggregate not to exceed the height of the adjacent quarry sides. 6.
Standard hours of operation Minutes: The
Committee considered (PN7) a retrospective application which sought consent for
a compound for the storage of building supplies and import of aggregate at Horsehay Quarry, Duns Tew and which
were carried out in association with the permitted sand extraction at the quarry
and which were proposed for the life of the quarry. RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Jelf,
seconded by Councillor Nimmo-Smith and carried unanimously)
that subject to
compliance with the existing routeing arrangement that planning permission for
application 09/01105/CM 09/0996/P/CM be
granted subject to conditions to be determined by the Head of Sustainable
Development but to include those matters set out below: 1.
Detailed
compliance is in complete accordance with plans and particulars 2.
Detailed duration
- development to commence within 3 years 3.
Development to end
at the same time as the quarry operations – 2018 4.
A 15 metre
stand-off area between the storage and processing activities and the geological
features of interest to be agreed and implemented. 5.
Stockpiles of
imported aggregate not to exceed the height of the adjacent quarry sides. 6.
Standard hours of
operation |
|
|
Report by Head of Sustainable Development (PN8) This application is for the erection of a new single storey Pre-school
and Foundation Stage building at Clanfield CE Primary
School. The new building would provide two classrooms, a quiet room, storage
and ancillary WC and kitchen accommodation. The proposal also involves the
creation of a hard play area associated with the new building and the
formalisation of the existing school parking area. Objections to the
application have been received on the grounds that: the need for the building
has not been justified; the location, design and materials of the building are
unacceptable; the impact on neighbouring residents and trees; increased flood
risk and that the development will raise traffic and highway concerns. Full
details of these objections and the comments of other consultees
are summarised in the report. The Committee is
RECOMMENDED to approve Application Number R3.0109/09 for the erection of a
single storey pre-school and foundation stage building to provide: 2
classrooms; storage; WC; quiet room; kitchenette and lobby accommodation,
creation of new hard play area and footpath and formalisation of existing
parking areas to provide 13 dedicated (including one disabled) parking spaces
subject to conditions to be determined by the Head of Sustainable Development
to include the following matters: 1.
That the development must be carried out
strictly in accordance with the particulars contained in the application and
the plans accompanying subject to conditions below. 2.
Detailed duration – 3 years – that the
development shall commence within 3 years of the date of the permission. 3.
Hours of use - The building shall be used
only for school and pre school purposes and only between the hours of 8 a.m. to
6 p.m. Monday to Friday. 4.
Approval of sample external materials – that
samples of the external materials proposed to be used shall be submitted and
agreed prior to the commencement of development. 5.
Contractors access – that the hours of access
(including for deliveries) for construction traffic shall be agreed in
consultation with the school before the start of works on the site. 6.
Contractors compound - the location of any
contractors compound shall be submitted and agreed (and appropriately fenced
off) prior to the commencement of development. 7.
Reinstatement
of playing field - on completion of the development the temporary contractor’s
access road and ancillary construction works shall be removed and the
playing field land shall be reinstated to a playing field to a quality at least
equivalent (or better) than the current quality. 8.
Tree protection during construction works –
that no development shall take place until the trees on the site which are to
be retained and which are adjacent to or within the development area, have been
protected during building operations by means of a protective fence around the
edge of the canopy of the trees. 9. Tree protection during construction works – no development shall take place in the 3 metre strip of land between the school boundary and ... view the full agenda text for item 60/09 Minutes: The
Committee considered (PN8) an application for the erection of a new single storey
Pre-school and Foundation Stage building at Clanfield
CE Primary School. Simon
Turner did not object to the proposals for co-location but the current proposal
would have an adverse impact on the local area increasing the risk of flooding and
had been rejected by the Parish Council on those grounds and proposed a building
which was totally disproportionate and seemed to contravene existing planning policies. Bryn
Torrington endorsed those comments and referred to the increase traffic impact and
congestion on Main Street. The proposal also
seemed unjustified in view of comments from the Headteacher
that numbers were falling. John
Keeling advised that the threat from flooding came from excess run-off and was
not fluvial and the current proposal exacerbated that threat. Proposed soakaways were
not suitable. The local water table was too high and any further flooding events
would mean water would inevitable flow into neighbouring properties. Photographs were tabled showing flood water in
neighbouring gardens. He also referred
to loss of privacy and light. James
Fitzpatrick lived on the north dside of the development
and again was not against co-location. However
he shared concerns regarding the size of the building and proposed materials. He referred to flooding which had occurred in
2007 and nearly again in 2008 which had been caused by excess water run off. Any
further development would need an adequate drainage scheme and proposed soakaways would not achieve that level of drainage. Replying
to Councillor Seale Mr Torrington confirmed that congestion occurred for about 30
minutes at each end of the school day. Mike
Freeman (supported by Jill Kewley and Jill Brown) referred
to the huge support for this proposal and the improved facilities which would be
provided for children. Relocation would not materially affect traffic flow and would
increase safety by reducing the need to cross between the tow current facilities. It had been felt that the current location and
materials were the best and amendments to the scheme had been included to minimise
fears of flooding such as new playground which had been designed to retain excess
water. Responding
to Councillor Hannaby Jill Kewley
confirmed that colocation would be of huge benefit and
work was underway to provide a green travel plan and the pre-school would be encouraged
to adopt the walk to school scheme which the main school had adopted. Responding
to Councillor Seale Mr Freeman described the events of 2007 when the stream through
the village had been clogged with weeds. Water had had come up through the floor and had
not been run-off. Work had been undertaken to clear that problem and route flows
were now directed correctly through Cuttle Brook. Councillor Seale referred to the levels of water from new building developments in Carterton which had had a tremendous impact on the levels of water going through the village. However, a great deal of work had now been done to ensure the stream did its job and ... view the full minutes text for item 60/09 |
|
|
Report by Head of Sustainable
Development (PN9) The report describes the planning application for the erection of a
single storey building in the grounds of Bampton CE
Primary School to provide a new Children’s Centre. The application is being reported to
Committee because objections have been received from local residents. The report outlines the objections received,
along with the other consultation responses, the comments of the Head of
Sustainable Development and the recommendation on the application. It
is RECOMMENDED that planning permission for Application No. R3.0179/09 (for the
erection of a single storey Children’s Centre and free standing canopy along
with associated works including alterations to the existing school entrance, four
new parking spaces, and outdoor play area, landscaping and fencing) at Bampton CE Primary School be approved subject to conditions
to be determined by the Head of Sustainable Development dealing with matters
including those set out below: 1.
Detailed compliance condition – development
to be in accordance with approved plans and particulars. 2.
Detailed duration – development to commence
within 3 years. 3.
Schedule of external materials to be used to
be agreed. 4.
Landscaping scheme (to include replacement
trees) to be submitted and agreed. 5.
Approved landscaping scheme to be
implemented. 6.
Measures to protect trees and hedgerow to be
retained during construction works to be submitted, agreed and implemented. 7.
Update existing School Travel Plan. 8.
Existing cycle provision to be retained. 9.
No vegetation to be removed during bird
breeding season. 10.
Trees to be removed to be soft felled and
under supervision of Oxfordshire County Council’s Protected Species Officer. 11.
Construction work to cease if any protected
species are found on site, and a mitigation strategy submitted and agreed with
Natural England. Archaeological
Informative – If archaeological finds do occur during development, the County
Archaeologist shall be notified in order that he may visit the site and advise
as necessary. Minutes: The
Committee considered (PN9) and application for the erection of a single storey building
in the grounds of Bampton CE Primary School to provide
a new Children’s Centre. RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Seale, seconded by Councillor Hannaby and carried unanimously) planning permission for Application No. R3.0179/09
(for the erection of a single storey Children’s Centre and free standing canopy
along with associated works including alterations to the existing school
entrance, four new parking spaces, and outdoor play area, landscaping and
fencing) at Bampton CE Primary School be approved
subject to conditions to be determined by the Head of Sustainable Development
dealing with matters including those set out below: 1.
Detailed
compliance condition – development to be in accordance with approved plans and
particulars. 2.
Detailed duration
– development to commence within 3 years. 3.
Schedule of
external materials to be used to be agreed. 4.
Landscaping
scheme (to include replacement trees) to be submitted and agreed. 5.
Approved
landscaping scheme to be implemented. 6.
Measures to
protect trees and hedgerow to be retained during construction works to be
submitted, agreed and implemented. 7.
Update existing
School Travel Plan. 8.
Existing cycle
provision to be retained. 9.
No vegetation to
be removed during bird breeding season. 10.
Trees to be
removed to be soft felled and under supervision of Oxfordshire County Council’s
Protected Species Officer. 11.
Construction work
to cease if any protected species are found on site, and a mitigation strategy
submitted and agreed with Natural England. Archaeological
Informative – If archaeological finds did occur during development, the County
Archaeologist should be notified in order that he might visit the site and
advise as necessary. |