10:55 – 11:05
To agree the Committee’s work
programme for the next meeting, and to confirm its plans for work programming
the remainder of the 2023/24 civic year.
The Committee is recommended
to:
a) AGREE the Committee’s work programme to September including, if necessary, an extraordinary meeting at the end of June, having made any additions or other changes as necessary
b)
CONFIRM its wish to undertake an in-depth
work programming exercise to include engagement with HOSC members, and the
County Council, NHS and Healthwatch colleagues to refine the programme and
timings.
Minutes:
The Chair invited the
Committee to discuss its work programme for the 2022/23 municipal year.
These points were highlighted
by the Committee during the debate:
·
Helen Mitchell
reminded the Committee that Scrutiny was a Member-led function within the
Council and as such it was for the Committee to determine its work programme.
Members of the Committee should take responsibility for both drawing up and
managing their own work programme. The work programme was a dynamic document
that was a subject to change and Members could add, subtract, and defer items
as necessary.
·
The Chair
outlined that she would meet with Interim Chief Executive to discuss on
resources to deliver the programme.
·
Some Members felt
that Primary Care update could be brought forward considering that a lot of
concerns had been raised at the last meeting.
·
In terms of the
Primary Care update – the Committee expressed their concerns at the last
meeting and going forward on this matter there may be a workshop in September
·
The Chair
informed the Committee that she had not lost sight of ‘Covid recovery’ and
‘Community Services Strategy’ items. The
Chair reminded the Committee that concerns were raised by Members at March
meeting in terms the lack of information and wider public, partners and
community groups engagement (in particular for
‘Community Services Strategy’) on these issues, and for those reasons dates for
above items were yet to be allocated.
·
Members of the
Committee were invited to engage in items on the work programme and therefore
minimise pressure on scrutiny officers and internal/external officers. Such engagement could be in a way of visiting
sites, discussions with public, partners and community groups, performing a
research, etc.
·
The Chair
welcomed a proposal from the Committee to add ‘Smoke Free Strategy’ to the Work
Programme. The Chair suggested that this
item could be consider at September meeting of the Committee.
·
The Committee
debated next steps in terms of the Sub/Working Group work as well as progress
with Briefings for Member Information. The Chair said that progress on these
would depend on Member engagement and their time to participate in workshops,
officers and partners availability and the timing of events relevant the nature
of particular issues (i.e. development of ICB
Strategy, details around section 106 agreement within housing developments and
primary care neds, and similar).
It was RESOLVED to note
the current Work Programme and take on board comments and suggestion from the
Members on future items.
11.10 am
To discuss the Committee’s
work programme for the 2022/23 municipal year.
The Committee is
RECOMMENDED to: -
a)
Agree the Committee’s work programme for
the municipal year 2022/23;
b)
Note that the work programme is a
document that is subject to change and Members can add, subtract and defer
items as necessary;
c)
Agree to consider the work programme at
each meeting of the Committee over the course of the municipal year alongside
the Council’s Forward Plan;
d)
Agree to undertake further engagement
with the County Council, NHS and Healthwatch colleagues to refine the programme
and timings.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair invited the
Committee to discuss its work programme for the 2022/23 municipal year.
These points were highlighted
by the Committee during the debate:
·
Helen Mitchell
reminded the Committee that Scrutiny was a Member-led function within the
Council and as such it was for the Committee to determine its work programme.
Members of the Committee should take responsibility for both drawing up and
managing their own work programme. The work programme was a dynamic document
that was a subject to change and Members could add, subtract, and defer items
as necessary.
·
The Chair
outlined that she would meet with Interim Chief Executive to discuss on
resources to deliver the programme.
·
Some Members felt
that Primary Care update could be brought forward considering that a lot of
concerns had been raised at the last meeting.
·
In terms of the
Primary Care update – the Committee expressed their concerns at the last
meeting and going forward on this matter there may be a workshop in September
·
The Chair
informed the Committee that she had not lost sight of ‘Covid recovery’ and
‘Community Services Strategy’ items. The
Chair reminded the Committee that concerns were raised by Members at March
meeting in terms the lack of information and wider public, partners and
community groups engagement (in particular for
‘Community Services Strategy’) on these issues, and for those reasons dates for
above items were yet to be allocated.
·
Members of the
Committee were invited to engage in items on the work programme and therefore
minimise pressure on scrutiny officers and internal/external officers. Such engagement could be in a way of visiting
sites, discussions with public, partners and community groups, performing a
research, etc.
·
The Chair
welcomed a proposal from the Committee to add ‘Smoke Free Strategy’ to the Work
Programme. The Chair suggested that this
item could be consider at September meeting of the Committee.
·
The Committee
debated next steps in terms of the Sub/Working Group work as well as progress
with Briefings for Member Information. The Chair said that progress on these
would depend on Member engagement and their time to participate in workshops,
officers and partners availability and the timing of events relevant the nature
of particular issues (i.e. development of ICB
Strategy, details around section 106 agreement within housing developments and
primary care neds, and similar).
It was RESOLVED to note
the current Work Programme and take on board comments and suggestion from the
Members on future items.