Meeting documents

Pension Fund Committee
Friday, 25 August 2006

PF250806-16

Return to Agenda

Division(s): N/A

ITEM PF16

PENSION FUND COMMITTEE – 25 AUGUST 2006

PENSION FUND INVESTMENT AND ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES
OUTTURN REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2006

Report by the Head of Finance & Procurement

Introduction

  1. In February 2005 the Pension Fund Committee agreed a budget in respect of the Pension Fund’s investment and administration expenses for the 2005/06 financial year. The production of this budget was in accordance with a recommendation of best practice set out in the Myners Report.
  2. Annex 1 (download as .xls file) compares the Investment Management and Scheme Administration outturn figures against the budget and shows the variations against each budget head. The reasons for the larger variations are explained below.
  3. Investment Management Expenses

  4. The largest component of the Investment Management expenses budget is the external fund management fees. The budgeted sum for this service was £2,100,000 but the actual fees were £2,423,000. The difference was mainly due to a much larger increase than forecast in the market value of the Pension Fund’s assets over the twelve month period. The value of the assets was £755 million at 31 March 2005 and £958 million at 31 March 2006, which represents an increase of 27%. The managers’ fees are calculated on the market values of their portfolios.
  5. The £14,000 overspend on the Global Custody Fee budget is again mainly attributable to the large increase in the value of assets.
  6. The £20,000 ‘overspend’ on the Financial Adviser’s fee is accounted for by the £20,000 ex gratia sum awarded to him in respect of the substantially extra duties he carried out for the two year period ended 30 November 2005. The extra work included the management restructuring of the Pension Fund and the Strategic Asset Allocation Review. Officers have tended to use the Independent Financial Adviser’s expertise on investment matters, in preference to other external consultants, because it has proven to be far more cost effective. Furthermore, there is the added advantage that he is very familiar with the workings of the Oxfordshire Fund and as a consequence the advice is much more tailored to the Fund’s own particular needs.
  7. The external consultancy budget was underspent by £12,000 and the Member Training budget by £11,000. Despite the underspend on the member training budget, the budget in respect of 2006/07 has been maintained at £12,000, in line with the Myners report recommendation that trustee training should be given a high priority.
  8. The income generated from commission recapture and stock lending was higher than forecast. The only manager that participates in the commission recapture programme is Alliance Bernstein, and part of the higher income received was attributable to the extra trading activity they carried out, as a consequence of them switching into their Global Value Fund. The £43,000 of income received on stock lending was substantially more than the £18,000 received in 2004/05 when this activity was first introduced.
  9. Scheme Administration Expenses

  10. One major variance in this service is the £11,000 under spend in the financial services charges related principally to staffing costs (£6,000 under spend relating to a member of staff moving, post maternity leave, from full time to part time working) and training (£4,000 allocated for a training course, which was cancelled).
  11. Elsewhere, a number of minor variances makes up the balance of £11,000 under spend.
  12. RECOMMENDATIONS

  13. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to receive the report and note the out-turn position.

SUE SCANE
Head of Finance & Procurement

Background Papers: Nil

Contact Officers:
Tony Wheeler, Pension Fund Investments Manager Tel. (01865) 815287
Sally Fox, Pensions Administration Manager Tel. (01865) 816080

August 2006

Return to TOP