ITEM PF12 - ANNEX 1
PENSION FUND COMMITTEE – 24 MAY 2002THE MYNERS
REVIEW ON INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
|
1. Effective decision-making |
Comply |
Define who takes investment decisions |
Yes |
Consider whether members have sufficient skills |
Partly |
Determine whether appropriate training is being provided |
Partly |
Assess whether in-house staffing support is sufficient |
Yes |
Establish an investment committee with suitable terms of reference |
Yes |
Draw up a business plan |
Partly |
2.Clear objectives |
Comply |
Set overall investment objectives specific only to the fund’s liabilities |
Yes |
Determine parameters for employer contributions |
Yes |
Specify attitude to risk and limits |
Yes |
Identify performance expectations and timing of evaluation |
Yes |
Peer group benchmark in use for comparison purposes only |
Yes |
3. Focus on asset allocation |
Comply |
Priority is given to strategic asset allocation decisions |
Yes |
All asset classes permitted within the regulations have been considered |
Yes |
Asset allocation is compatible with liabilities and diversification requirements |
Yes |
4. Expert advice |
Comply |
Separate contracts in place for actuarial services and investment advice |
No |
Terms of reference specified |
No |
Specify role of S151 officer in relation to advisers |
Yes |
Tender procedures followed without cost constraint factor |
Yes |
5. Explicit mandates |
Comply |
Written mandate in management contract containing elements specified |
Partly |
Constraints on the types of investment are in line with regulations |
Partly |
Reasons stated if soft commissions permitted |
No |
6. Activism |
Comply |
Incorporate US Principles on activism into mandates |
No |
Engage external voting agencies if appropriate |
Yes |
Review manager strategies |
No |
Establish means to measure effectiveness |
No |
7. Appropriate benchmarks |
Comply |
Consider whether index benchmarks selected are appropriate |
Yes |
Limits on divergence from index are relevant |
Partly |
Active or passive management considered |
Partly |
Targets and risk controls reflect performance expectations |
Partly |
8. Performance measurement |
Comply |
Formal structure for regular monitoring in operation |
Yes |
Arrangements in place to assess procedures and decisions of members |
Yes |
Similar arrangements established for advisers and managers |
No |
9. Transparency |
Comply |
SIP updated as specified |
No |
Consultation undertaken on amendments |
No |
Changes notified to stakeholders |
Partly |
10. Regular reporting |
Comply |
Publish changes to SIP and its availability |
Partly |
Identify monitoring information to report |
Partly |
Inform scheme members of key monitoring data and compliance with principles |
Partly |