Meeting documents

Pension Fund Committee
Friday, 22 February 2002

PF220202-17

Return to Agenda

ITEM PF17

PENSION FUND COMMITTEE 22 FEBRUARY 2002

CONTRIBUTIONS PAID TO SECURE PROVISION OF WIDOWERS’ BENEFIT

Report by the Director for Business Support and County Treasurer

 

Introduction

  1. The current regulations for the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) came into force from 1.4.1998. These regulations gave employers in the pension fund the power to improve the widower’s pension, enabling it to be based on the member’s service from 1972 at no additional cost to that member. Prior to 1998 a widower’s pension would be based only on service after April 1988, although the opportunity to use earlier service was available if married women elected to pay extra contributions.
  2. Employer’s discretion

  3. Using the discretionary power within these regulations, Oxfordshire County Council, as an employer within this fund, resolved in 1998 to provide this improved package at no additional cost to the scheme member. Other employers within this fund followed the County’s lead but each employer was required to make its own determination.
  4. At the time the County used this discretionary power, 45 women had elected to pay the additional contributions, and of those, 19 were County employees and 10 were still employed. The additional contributions ceased after 31 March 1998.
  5. The resolution mentioned in paragraph 2 above only applies to current scheme members at the time of the resolution and future scheme members. It does not apply to deferred scheme members and therefore the 9 County employees that had left before the resolution retain their right to a widower’s pension based on the contributions paid up to the date of leaving.
  6. Double provision

  7. Shortly after these regulations were introduced and the additional contributions stopped, some of the scheme contributors asked what would happen to their contributions previously paid. It was expected that the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, [now DLTR] would issue guidance to employers. DLTR have provided informal suggestions but no formal instructions on this matter. The contributions cannot simply be returned. The following table shows the options available, with effects and considerations.
  8. OPTIONS

    EFFECT

    (a) Using the employers’ discretionarypower to augment member’s service. The additional contributions paid could be a means to determine the additional membership.

    This Council has a policy stating exercise of this discretion will only be in exceptional circumstances. ‘Exceptional circumstances’ have not been defined.

    A separate case would need to be made for each woman when entitled to an immediate payment of benefit on leaving.

    Could not be used for leavers before entitlement to immediate pension payment.

    Service augmentation increases the member’s personal benefit and that of the spouse.

    OPTIONS

    EFFECT

    (b) Increasing the widower’s benefit only, as above but in the cases where the scheme member has already secured maximum personal benefits.

    Considerations as mentioned in the category above also apply but a change to the Council’s policy would be required to provide this additional cover.

    (c) Reimbursing the contributions less statutory deductions.

    The pension regulations do not provide powers to make such a payments The Council has no general powers to make ex-gratia payments. In a similar case, where an ex-gratia payment was used to resolve the issue, the District Auditor was very critical of the Council’s action.

    (d) Take no further action.

    The contributions were paid at a time when this was the only means for most married women to provide a widowers pension within the LGPS for service between 1972 and 1988. As soon as Oxfordshire used the discretionary power to provide this cover with no extra cost to members, the additional contributions ceased.

    Had a female member died before 1.4.1998 only those paying the contributions would have provided a benefit for their spouse on service between 1972 and 1988.

    In the same way as a term insurance policy works when the cover is no longer needed payment ceases with no additional benefit for having paid the contributions.

  9. There has not been a specific sanction from the DTLR and therefore the questions posed by the contributors remain unanswered. None of the above options offer a satisfactory solution. Option (d) is the least problematical and treats all contributors the same.
  10. Financial Implications

  11. Contributors were paying for the widowers pension either by regular additional contributions as a percentage of pay, with tax relief, or alternatively contributors could make a one-off lump sum payment. All contributions were paid into the Oxfordshire Pension Fund.
  12. Five of the ten current county contributors chose to pay by the one-off lump sum method. The total amount received from these five contributors was £3450.65.
  13. The remaining five contributors were paying an average of 0.71% per year of their salary. The cumulative total contributions received up to the date of the resolution was approximately £4100.00.
  14. Staff and Environmental Implications

  15. There are no staffing or environmental implications.
  16.   RECOMMENDATION

  17. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to approve option d) from the above table. The County Treasurer is requested to contact the women employed by the County Council to advise them of the decision and also to inform the other employers within the Oxfordshire Fund.

 

CHRIS GRAY
Director for Business Support

Background papers: Nil

Contact Officer: Jenny Wylie, Pensions Manager Tel: (01865) 815530

February 2002

Return to TOP