Venue: Room 2 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Contact: Chris Reynolds, Committee Officer Tel: 07542 029441 Email: chris.reynolds@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Link: video link: https://oxon.cc/PLO16112022
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Cllr Sally Povolotsky |
|
To approve the minutes of the meetings held on 15 June and 7 October 2022 (PLOSC3) and to receive information arising from them. Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meetings held on 15 June and 7 October 2022 were approved as a correct record |
|
Petitions and Public Address Members of the public who wish to speak at this meeting can attend the meeting in person or ‘virtually’ through an online connection. To facilitate ‘hybrid’ meetings we are asking that requests to speak are submitted by no later than 9am four working days before the meeting i.e., 9am on Thursday 10 November 2022. Requests to speak should be sent to chris.reynolds@oxfordshire.gov.uk If you are speaking ‘virtually’, you may submit a written statement of your presentation to ensure that if the technology fails, then your views can still be taken into account. A written copy of your statement can be provided no later than 9am 2 working days before the meeting. Written submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Minutes: Mr Patrick Davey representing residents of the West-East Roads in Walton Manor, addressed the Committee. He said that residents were concerned about the affects of the Hythe Bridge St Bus Gate and the inner ring road/South Walton St ZEZ which would result in traffic displacement onto roads in their area. He suggested that a key test of any traffic measure was that it reduced traffic. He suggested that:-
- All change should benefit all residents. Changes which simply move traffic, so some benefit at others’ expense, are not acceptable.
- Any change should reduce vehicle traffic and pollution in all areas and create safe walking and cycling in all areas.
- Changes should reduce traffic on residential roads over main trunk roads: no scheme should displace traffic into residential roads
In general, this meant that:
- Changes to the status quo should not be taken lightly as traffic flows along historic patterns for good reasons.
- The broader consequences of any plan must be properly investigated and modelled. Data is required before and after changes. The council must act if problems come to light.
- And when it comes to the council’s proposed measures these same principles mean that:
- Bus gates must not displace or cage traffic in residential roads which are not equipped to take more traffic.
- ZEZs must be introduced wholesale, not piecemeal, to prevent traffic displacement. No-one should benefit at the expense of others.
additional plans form Jericho/Walton Manor - a traffic filter in north Walton St outside Walton St cycles. This is a measure that has almost universal support in Walton Manor. It is a key measure to distribute traffic equitably and reduce car journeys overall. Second, if the current plans are put on hold because of railway bridge work, we suggest trialling a city-wide congestion charge. This has many advantages over the current scheme and would again assuage our fears.
The Chair thanked Mr Davey and asked that his address be sent to all Cabinet members
|
|
Cabinet responses to travel related committee scrutiny reports PDF 288 KB The Committee’s Transport Policy Development Working Group carried out a review of the Local Transport and Connectivity Plan and set out their recommendations in a report to the Committee on 15 June 2022. Annex 1 sets out these recommendations and the Cabinet’s response.
In addition, the Committee discussion about the LTCP on 15 June 2022 generated a number of observations which the Committee resolved to report to Cabinet. Annex 2 sets out these observations and the Cabinet’s response accordingly
Finally, at its meeting on 7 October 2022, the Committee recommended that a review be undertaken of the relationship between parking availability and private car use. The result of that review was reported to the Cabinet on 18 October 2022 and is provided here in Annex 3.
The Committee is RECOMMENDED to note the Cabinet’s responses to their recommendations and observations and, where stated, to agree to return to specific issues in the future through the forward plan.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee had before it a report setting out the Cabinet’s responses to recommendations regarding the Local Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP) and the relationship between parking availability and private car use.
A member suggested that, as the Oxfordshire Plan 2050 had been withdrawn, it would be appropriate to ask the Cabinet to revisit recommendation 22 in the report “the council should develop an Oxfordshire[1]-wide transport strategy, taking a system leadership role across Oxfordshire transport, land-use and place-shaping that considers all transport stakeholders, policies, projects and data.
RESOLVED to
1) note the Cabinet’s responses to their recommendations and observations and, where stated, to agree to return to specific issues in the future through the forward plan.
2) refer the recommendation 22 back to the Cabinet and ask for it to be reconsidered |
|
Central Oxfordshire Travel Plan PDF 101 KB Report by the Corporate Director of Environment and Place
This report provides the Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee with information about the Central Oxfordshire Travel Plan (COTP) prior to it being submitted to Cabinet on the 29November 2022.
The COTP sits within ‘part 2’ of the local transport plan process. Along with other plans for certain area and specific corridors, the COTP sets out how policies within Part 1 of the LTCP will be applied across specific geographic areas, in this case the central Oxfordshire area.
Part 1 of the local transport plan (the Local Transport and Connectivity Plan) was considered by the Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee in June 2022, prior to adoption at full council in July 2022.
Analysis of the public consultation on the COTP (undertaken between August and October 2022) identifies a number of amendments to the COTP.
Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee are therefore asked to provide any comments on the proposed revisions to COTP prior to its consideration by Cabinet. Additional documents:
Minutes:
(Councillor Duncan Enright, Cabinet Member for Travel and Development Strategy and Councillor Andrew Gant, Cabinet Member for Highway Management, attended the meeting for this and item 22 below)
The Committee had before it a report providing the Committee with information about the Central Oxfordshire Travel Plan (COTP) prior to it being submitted to Cabinet on the 29November 2022.
The COTP sat within ‘part 2’ of the local transport plan process. Along with other plans for certain area and specific corridors, the COTP sets out how policies within Part 1 of the LTCP will be applied across specific geographic areas, in this case the central Oxfordshire area.
Part 1 of the local transport plan (the Local Transport and Connectivity Plan) was considered by the Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee in June 2022, prior to adoption at full council in July 2022.
Analysis of the public consultation on the COTP (undertaken between August and October 2022) identifies a number of amendments to the COTP
The Chair introduced the report and welcomed a number of speakers who had been invited to address the Committee.
Councillor Andrew Gant, Cabinet member for Highway Management, presented the report and explained the background to the preparation and revisions to the COTP.
Robin Tucker, representing the Coalition for Healthy Streets and Active Travel, spoke in support of the COTP. He referred to the traffic congestion levels in Oxford which had returned since the pandemic and said that the measures set out in the COTP had gained the support of residents and the business community. He suggested that a number of improvements were required:-
- Reduction in the number of passes - Avoid universal pass and exemption gaming bureaucracy - Personal travel planning - Hythe Bridge Street – motor free - Longwall/St. Cross Street Bus Gate - Vans only for legitimate businesses
Mr Tucker then answered a number of questions.
Emily Scaysbrook, Oxford Business Action Group, addressed the Committee. She made the following points:
- that the proposed traffic filters would increase emissions and traffic congestion on the ring road and main arterial roads into Oxford. - traffic would continue to access Oxford through alternative routes - Any experimental schemes should be properly monitored and evaluated - The schemes, if not successful, had the potential to cause irreparable damage to businesses in the city - Businesses were struggling in the current economic climate and the Council had not completed an economic impact assessment of the proposals - The scheme was not transparent and easy to understand - A congestion charge should be considered initially, at least during rush hour periods
Richard Parnham, Reconnecting Oxford, addressed the Committee. He made the following points about the COTP proposals:-
- There had been a poor response rate to consultation - Need to identify a starting baseline year for evaluating traffic volumes - The proposed ZEZ did not target main sources pollution - Workplace parking levy would only affect a small proportion of users - Proposals were not hitting the ... view the full minutes text for item 21/22 |
|
Report by the Corporate Director for Environment and Place
Oxfordshire County Council wants to reduce unnecessary journeys by private vehicles., This will help deliver an affordable, sustainable and inclusive transport system that enables the county to thrive whilst protecting the environment and making Oxfordshire a better place to live for all residents.
Traffic filters are an important tool to achieve this in Oxford and have been part of Oxford’s transport strategy since 2015, including the recently adopted Local Transport and Connectivity Plan. They were subject to public consultation in 2019.
This Report summarises the key findings of the consultation and the proposed changes to its plans for Travel Filters going forwards
The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
a) Review the emerging summary of the public consultation and scheme impact assessments for the proposed trial traffic filters in Oxford; and
b) Review and comment on the proposed changes to be made to the scheme in light of the public consultation (Annex 4).
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee had before it a report on the amended proposals for Traffic filters following consultation. Oxfordshire County Council aimed to reduce unnecessary journeys by private vehicles., This would help deliver an affordable, sustainable and inclusive transport system that enabled the county to thrive whilst protecting the environment and making Oxfordshire a better place to live for all residents.
Traffic filters were an important tool to achieve this in Oxford and have been part of Oxford’s transport strategy since 2015, including the recently adopted Local Transport and Connectivity Plan. They were subject to public consultation in 2019.
Councillor Andrew Gant, Cabinet member for Highway Management, introduced the report.
The Committee considered the amendments to the Traffic filters scheme and agreed a number of recommendations.
RESOLVED to recommend the Cabinet that the Council:
a) develops models of the impacts of its pass scheme, and that a review of pass availability based on monitoring is undertaken within 3 months b) reviews the number of residential passes made available, with a view to pursuing greater traffic reduction c) implements the policy that universal passes should be made available only to Oxfordshire residents d) consults with the Street Voice Citizens’ Jury members on the optimal design of traffic filter passes e) undertakes a representative polling exercise on the proposals alongside the ETRO consultation f) adopts a default position that vans are not allowed to use traffic filters, and that it develops a definition which creates exceptions for legitimate business use g) provides a clear definition to the term ‘car club’ in order to prevent gaming h) publishes the advice and reasoning on which the recommendation to delay the start date of the trial is based i) does not accept the recommendations in Annex 4 concerning changes to the timing for filters on Hythe Bridge Street and Hollow Way/Marston Ferry Road and continues with the timings proposed in the consultation j) removes ‘until 2024’ from its recommendation to delay the start date for the trial in Annex 4 k) reviews the impact of proposals with a view to improving the ease of egress for users of Redbridge Park and Ride l) undertakes work around Personal Travel Planning alongside the Traffic Filters proposals
|
|
Review of the Local Transport Plan 4 PDF 207 KB Report by the Corporate Director for Environment and Place
This report provides the Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee with information about the findings of the review of the Local Transport Plan 4. This was produced in response to the recommendation made by the Committee at the 15 June meeting. The LTP4 review report can be found in Annex 1.
The Place Overview and Scrutiny Committee are RECOMMENDED to
1) Consider the findings of the review of the Local Transport Plan 4; and
2) Make any recommendations for the LTCP it feels appropriate based on the lessons learned from the review.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee had before it a report providing information about the findings of the review of the Local Transport Plan 4. This was produced in response to the recommendation made by the Committee at the 15 June meeting.
The Head of Transport Policy presented the report.
Following discussion it was -
RESOLVED to
1) note the report
2) recommend the Cabinet that the Council:
a) develops SMART KPIs to monitor the progress of LTCP 5 in meeting its objectives.
b) applies the lessons learnt from its review of LTCP 4, in particular in relation to OXIS, the development of Environment and Place KPIs, and capital budget programmes
|
|
Cabinet response to the recommendations of the Carbon Reduction Targets working group PDF 152 KB The Committee is RECOMMENDED to note the Cabinet’s responses to their recommendations and, where stated, to agree to return to specific issues in the future through the forward plan.
Minutes: RESOLVED to note the Cabinet’s responses to their recommendations on Carbon Reduction Targets and, where stated, to agree to return to specific issues in the future through the forward plan.
|
|
The Council Forward Plan and the Committee work programme PDF 143 KB The Committee are asked to review the work programme, focussing on the items for the next meeting and confirm main agenda items. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee reviewed its work programme for 2022/23.
Members expressed concern about the current difficulties regarding the recruitment and retention of staff to resource the Council’s scrutiny function. The Principal Overview and Scrutiny Officer explained the current position regarding recruitment to the Scrutiny team. He was asked to report the Committee’s concerns to the Human Resources department.
RESOLVED to:
1) approve the Committee’s work programme for 2022/23 2) A briefing to be organised to discuss Environment and Place KPI development for 23/24 around January
|