Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families
Forward Plan Ref: 2013/089
Contact: Neil Darlington, Service Manager – Admissions & Transport Tel: (01865) 815844
Report by Director for Children’s Services (CA6).
The Council has undertaken a
consultation with the public, headteachers and other
interested parties upon a number of proposed changes to the Home to School
Transport Policy.
The proposed changes have been
made in the light of the current difficult financial situation in the UK, the
continuing impact this will have on local government finances, and the need to
ensure that the Home to School Transport Policy is equitable.
The report contains an analysis
of the responses to the consultation.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED
to adopt the following proposals:
(a) To increase the charges for concessionary travel and post 16 travel in
2014/15 to £290.40 (£96.80 per two terms of the 6 term year) for those who live
under 3 miles from the school attended and £541.20 per annum (£180.40 per two
terms of the 6 term year) for those who live over 3 miles from the school
attended.
(b) To increase the concessionary fare by 2% per annum from September 2015
(c) From September 2014 to end the
waiving of the concessionary charge for the third and subsequent
children of families who have more than two children using the same home to
school transport service.
(d) From September 2013 onwards to only use the guidance issued by Road
Safety GB when making risk assessments of walked routes to school.
(e) From September 2014 onwards to adopt the phased ending of free travel to
the designated (catchment) school if the distance from home to school is over 3
miles if aged 8 or over, or 2 miles if less than aged 8 and of school age if it
is not the nearest school.
(f) To reassess routes designated as “unsafe walking routes” against the
guidance issued by Road Safety GB over 2013/14 and 2014/15.
(g) From 2013 to remove all references to collaborative learning transport
from the Home to School Transport Policy.
(h) From September 2013 to use a two stage review/appeal process in
accordance with the Department for Education Transport and Travel Guidance of
March 2013.
(i) All other parts of the proposed Home to
School Transport Policy not covered by proposals a to h for September 2014
onwards.
Minutes:
Cabinet had before them a report that contained an analysis
of the responses to a consultation with the public, head teachers and other
interested parties upon a number of proposed changes to the Home to School
Transport Policy. Cabinet further had a note from the Chairman of the Education
Scrutiny Committee containing recommendations following consideration of the
proposals at their meeting on 4 July 2013 and a further supplementary report
containing an update on the analysis of consultation responses in the light of
responses received since the circulation of the agenda. Finally Cabinet had
before them a supplementary report advising that the new Guidance which had
been the basis of consultation had now been withdrawn by the Department for
Education and the previous 2007 Guidance reinstated and that therefore it was
inappropriate to consider the proposals today.
Peter Clark, County Solicitor confirmed the advice given in
the supplementary report no decision on the current proposals be taken today.
Councillor Hudspeth indicated that he would be accepting the
advice given but that in any case he had been minded to defer the matter
following the letters and emails that he had received and other representations
made to him by councillors and the public. He accepted that there would be a
need to repeat the consultation and that he did not wish to rush this decision.
However he referred to the serious financial challenge that the Council faced
and that the whole budget was being considered to see where the savings could
be achieved. He noted that the proposals
had been in line with the then current guidance, had not affected anyone
currently in receipt of free transport and that the majority of parents were
not affected. His ambition was that all schools in Oxfordshire would be good or
excellent and that there would be no reason not to go to the local school. He
referred to a number of existing anomalies, stressed that he would meet with
residents and that he had an open mind.
Mrs Nelson, St Swithens CE Primary
School, Kennington resident, parent and Chair of Governors submitted a petition
against the proposals and in speaking to the petition highlighted 5 areas of
concern: she wished Kennington to maintain the diverse social cohorts it
currently achieved that she felt would be threatened by the changes to the
policy; child safety - it was impractical to expect parents to walk with their
children each day; congestion would increase; there were educational concerns
and concerns around social equality.
Councillor Lynda Atkins, as Chairman of the Education
Scrutiny Committee highlighted the key points set out in her note of the
discussion at the meeting on 4 July 2013.
Councillor George Reynolds, speaking as a local councillor
expressed concerns over the length of the consultation and the range of people
consulted. Parish Councils had not been consulted directly and more information
was needed on what the proposals meant to people. He also highlighted the
possible implications for the villages, parents, children and schools in his
division with 6 of 7 primary schools impacted and 10 of 25 villages/hamlets.
Councillor Kieron Mallon, speaking
as a local councillor accepted that savings had to be made but commented that
as a recent Cabinet member
he had been able to encourage and then vote for the provision of
a sixth form at Warriner School. The sixth form needed time to bed in and
their partnership working would be affected by Proposal 5. He welcomed the
deferral of any decision and agreed with others that the consultation had been
poor. He detailed concerns with regard to proposal 3 and 4 but welcomed that
the poorest families would not be affected, that it was to have been phased in
with a slow increase in charges. He urged the Cabinet to recognise the problems
for rural children.
Councillor Glynis Phillips, speaking as a local councillor expressedher relief that it was being withdrawn but added
her concerns to others including the local parish council for Risinghurst that the proposals would result in more
children being driven to school and that routes were
not safe.
Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Children,
Education & Families, stated that the Labour Group were in favour in
principle of looking at the policy and of protecting essential services. It was
a good idea if children did eventually go to their closest schools but she felt
that the current situation was poor and that the proposals suffered from poor
presentation, inadequate consultation and were hasty.
She welcomed the decision not to take these proposals forward and hoped that
future consultation would be better.
District Councillor for Garsington,
Elizabeth Gillespie spoke in support of points made by Maldon School. She
agreed with others that the consultation was flawed and also felt that the
financial conclusions were flawed as she did not believe that 3 buses could be
cancelled from Garsington. She also referred to the
importance of parental choice and that the most economically disadvantaged
families not be discouraged.
Sue Moon, Oxon Bus Action Group, indicated that she had only recently
set up the Action Group and already had over 1000 people using the Facebook page as a means of keeping in touch. She
highlighted that schools had only 1 week before the original end date of the
consultation and queried that as far as she could tell the matter had not been
raised with Parish Councils. She reiterated previous concerns relating to
safeguarding children’s safety. She warned that similar proposals to those
withdrawn today would see the campaign continue and she was certain that
councillors making this decision would find themselves punished at the ballot
box. She submitted a petition adding that she would be seeking sufficient
signatures to spark a Council debate. Councillors Fatemian and Tilley made it
clear that they had raised this matter at every Parish Council meeting they
attended.
Graham Speke, Carterton Community College, spoke in support
of the proposal highlighting that it would address an issue of inequality
across the County and referring particularly to the positive implications for
Carterton Community College.
Bob Edward, Governor at Carterton Community College spoke in
support of the proposal commenting that the current imbalance affecting
Carterton needed to be adjusted. However he supported greater consultation to
allow the democratic process to be seen.
Niall McWilliams, Head Teacher, Carterton Community College
supported the proposals on the basis of fairness and equity.
Annabel Kay Head Teacher, Warriner
School supported comments by Councillor Reynolds commenting that 6th
form status had been granted in July 2012 but that the current proposals put
the school significantly at risk.
Andrew Baud, founder of the Shutford
Community Association, member of the The Warriner Partnership working party and governor at Sibford Gower Primary School spoke against the proposals
asking Cabinet to look again at consultation, to work with all parties and to
consider ring fencing rural communities.
Kathy Haig, Headteacher, Burford
School spoke against the proposal but focussed on the common purpose of
providing outstanding education to all the children of Oxfordshire. She
highlighted the partnership working between Burford
School and local primary schools and that the proposals would mean that of 9
partner schools in only 2 cases would Burford School
be their nearest school. She suggested that transport be devolved to schools
noting that she already provided buses for out of hours activities.
Andrew Pitman, Chair of Governors, Burford
School, spoke against the proposals reiterating concerns that the proposal
would have been socially divisive and would have resulted in the destruction of
the catchment area. The proposal cold
see the numbers of children coming to Burford
falling substantially.
Richard Martin, governor at Burford
School, spoke against the report commenting that they only worked if parents
chose to pay for transport. The education of children was important and it
could not be right that this could be set by the bus transport team.
John White, Mayor of Burford spoke
against the report expressing the opposition of the Town Council.
Mr Rae, Chair of Governors at Brize
Norton Primary School highlighted the detrimental affect the changes would have
on the school which had been the first to be ajudged
excellent in all categories by Ofsted.
Ed Scates added his concerns to
those already heard.
Cabinet in discussion supported the proposal to defer
consideration for further review and a later consultation. However they
recognised the financial constraints the Council was under and that further
consideration of the way forward would be needed.
RESOLVED: to defer any decision and to
restart consultation in September with a view to reconsideration of the matter
at Cabinet’s meeting in November.
Supporting documents: