Cabinet Member: Education
Forward Plan Ref: 2013/007
Contact: Diane Cameron, School Organisation Officer Tel: (01865) 816445
Report by Director for Children’s Services (CA7).
Since starting in
post, the current Headteacher of Cutteslowe Primary School, Oxford has raised a
concern about the sufficiency of the FSU accommodation.
Officers consider
that the school has sufficient floor area for 60 F1 pupils and up to 26fte F2
(Nursery) pupils which would be typical of a 2 Form of Entry (admission number
60) primary school. However, the Headteacher and TCSAT, wish to continue to
admit up to 39 fte F2 (Nursery) pupils, which the school has chosen to do for
several years. There is an over-sufficiency of childcare for this age group in
the area.
An option
appraisal was commissioned by Children Education & Families to investigate
the FSU area and present options on what work might be carried out, and its
cost. No budget is identified to carry out any works to the FSU and so the
matter has now been referred to Cabinet to make a decision on whether to
allocate funds, and if so, how much.
Cabinet is recommended to:
(a)
decide whether it
would wish to financially support The Cherwell School Academy Trust's
aspiration to make provision for 78 (39 fte) rather than 52 (26 fte) F2
(nursery pupils); and
(b)
if it decides so to do whether to:
i.
fully fund the expansion of the Cutteslowe School
foundation stage area (as per Option 2 in Annex 1); or
ii. make
a maximum contribution towards the scheme and determine what that sum shall be.
Minutes:
In the light of a wish by the Head Teacher
and The Cherwell School Academy Trust to continue to provide 39 full time
equivalent (fte) F2 nursery places an option
appraisal was commissioned by Children Education & Families to investigate
the Foundation Stage Unit area and to present options on what work might be
carried out, and its cost. Cabinet considered a report on the options appraisal
that sought their decision on whether to allocate funds, and if so, how much.
Jon Gray, Head Teacher Cutteslowe Primary
School, spoke in support of the extension of the FSU to be able to continue to
provide 39fte nursery places. He highlighted that the school had been in
special measures for a number of years and that he had taken over late in 2011.
In their most recent OFSTED they had been found to making good progress. He
explained the background to the recent move under The Cherwell School Academy
Trust and highlighted that 40% of pupils were on free school meals and 50% did
not have English as a first language. These challenges shaped the curriculum on
offer. In referring to the report he stated that the concerns about the size of
the nursery unit had been voiced by the school before he had started. The
feasibility, procurement and design had all happened at once and he felt that
because of that these concerns had been missed. He was aware of only one school
of 60 F1 pupils that had only 26 F2 places. The rest were similar to Cutteslowe
Primary School and he noted that they already had 39 children in the morning
session. The additional provision would allow the school to take children
earlier and this would assist in their achievement. With an extended classroom
they could take some two year olds in line with the policy around provision for
disadvantaged two year olds.
Responding to a question on numbers from
Councillor Heathcoat, Mr Gray indicated that they already had 39 children in
the morning session and would want 39 in the afternoon session.
Councillor Jean Fooks, speaking as a local
councillor expressed surprise that the report referred to over provision in
Summertown and Wolvercote and stated that she did not
think this was the case. Of the nursery provision taken into account most were
private and very few are within one mile of school. Parents would not travel 3
miles with a young child. Cutteslowe Primary School nursery provision was full
and there was a waiting list. The school served a deprived area. The extension
of the main school to two form was good and The Cherwell School was delighted
at the joint Trust status. She felt that it was important that the County
Council did what it could and she very much hoped that some support could be
found. She referred to the map tabled by Mr Gray and explained where the
extended classroom could go. She referred to the additional housing in Wolvercote and that much of this would be social housing.
In response to a question from Councillor
Hibbert-Biles about the waiting list, Mr Gray returned to the table. He replied
that there were 28 in September but would be 39 in January. He added that he
had had to turn children away.
Councillor Tilley, Cabinet Member for
Education in introducing the contents of the report paid tribute to Jon Gray.
She highlighted that the County Council was spending £2m for the school to
become 2-form entry. There was no funding available from the County Council to
pay for additional nursery provision as it could not be considered under the
Basic Needs budget. As an Academy there were other funding streams available to
the school. She proposed that no financial support be provided to make
provision for 78 (39 fte) F2 places.
Roy Leach, confirmed the officer view that
there was not a basic need for additional places. It was expected that all
other provision be considered and there were sufficient places in the
recognised planning area. The School has sufficient space for 60 F1 pupils.
Responding to a question from the Leader he confirmed that if Cabinet agreed
the proposal then there would be additional over provision.
During discussion the following points were
made:
(1) This was money that the Council had not
got and there were many areas where Cabinet Members could identify additional
spend within their own areas that could not take place because funding was not
available.
(2) There was over capacity so funding could
not be provided through the Basic Needs budget. There was no objective need for
39 places morning and afternoon. However the school could access alternative
funding on suitability and condition as well as capacity. The Leader added that
he was sure that officers would be happy to assist in applying for these other
funding streams.
(3) As an Academy the School had more
autonomy and as there was a sufficiency of places then the County Council was
not responsible for this additional provision.
RESOLVED: Not to
financially support The Cherwell School Academy Trust's aspiration to make
provision for 78 (39 full time equivalent (fte))
rather than 52 (26 fte) F2 (nursery pupils).
Supporting documents: