Karen Fuller, Director of Adult Social Services, Ian Bottomley, Deputy Directo of Integrated Commissioning Health, Education and Social Care (HESC), and Isabel Rockingham, Interim Head of Joint Commissioning – Age Well, have been invited to present an Age Well Update on Supporting Older People in Oxfordshire.
The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom.
Minutes:
Karen Fuller, Director of Adult Social Services, Ian
Bottomley, Deputy Director of Integrated Commissioning Health, Education and
Social Care (HESC), and Cheryl Huntbach, Local Area Coordinator, were invited
to present the Age Well Update on Supporting Older People in Oxfordshire and
answer the Committee’s questions.
The Deputy Director introduced Age Well by noting
Oxfordshire’s growing population of 137,000 older people, with most not
receiving formal services. He stressed the council’s aim to help seniors live
independently through preventative measures like the Oxfordshire Way. By
addressing loneliness, isolation, and inactivity, and focusing on community
services and system planning, the council had reduced care home admissions and
enabled more older people to stay at home.
The Local Area Coordinator outlined the adoption of local
area coordination in Oxfordshire, one of eleven regions using the Australian
model. She described the coordinators' strengths-based, person-centred
approach, their ongoing support without strict referral criteria, and their
role as community connectors. The Local Area Coordinator illustrated its
benefits with an example of an older resident who became more active locally
after coordinator support, showing how early intervention can reduce reliance
on formal care.
The Committee raised the following questions and comments
related to the Age Well update:
·
How the original areas with a local area
coordinator were selected for expansion and why only two further areas were
added, despite the initial success. The Deputy Director of Integrated
Commissioning HESC and the Local Area Coordinator stated that new areas were
selected based on public health data identifying locations with deprivation and
need within Oxfordshire. The process also considered local interest and the
capacity to participate, with recruitment panels that included residents. The
decision to expand into two additional areas was influenced by programme costs
and the requirement for financial viability. Local area coordination may
continue to expand where it was assessed as effective, but resource constraints
and existing local interventions meant a countywide rollout was not pursued at
that time.
·
What the definition of rurality was and how it
was considered in the deployment of local area coordinators, how the impact of
these coordinators was measured, and what the potential was for expanding the
model to other highly deprived areas in Oxfordshire. The discussion recognised
that some areas lack community resources and could benefit from local area
coordination. The Deputy Director of Integrated Commissioning HESC noted
rurality was considered, but area selection focused mainly on need and deprivation,
with no single definition for rurality. Impact was measured using both
quantitative data and qualitative stories, though attributing outcomes to
coordinators remains complex due to overlapping services. It was emphasised
that new coordinators should complement, not duplicate, existing interventions
such as Age UK and Brighter Futures. Any expansion of the model will depend on
resources, proven impact, and strong partner collaboration to maximise
effectiveness and avoid duplication.
·
The Committee discussed the variations in
loneliness among individuals living alone in rural and urban areas, as well as
the ways in which strategies like social prescribing respond to these issues. The
Deputy Director of Integrated Commissioning HESC noted that loneliness affected
both rural and urban areas, sometimes more so in cities despite closer
proximity to others. The strategy to address loneliness focuses on
strengths-based assessments and connecting people with local community
resources, such as voluntary groups and Age UK, rather than relying on formal
care. Social prescribing and local area coordination were key elements. The
approach recognised that different communities have unique needs, so effective
interventions may vary by area. Ongoing work aimed to enhance support in both
rural and urban settings, tailoring solutions to local circumstances and
prioritising community-based connections.
·
Members highlighted concerns about the
distribution of community capacity grants, specifically noting an apparent
over-concentration of funding in the Oxford City area despite its lower
proportion of older residents compared to more rural districts. The Director of
Adult Social Services and the Deputy Director of Integrated Commissioning HESC
noted that more established organisations in Oxford City, familiar with funding
applications, tend to secure more grants, some of which extend beyond older
adults. To support smaller or rural groups, initiatives such as drop-in
sessions and a grants helpline were introduced. The discussion emphasised the
need for cross-departmental collaboration, especially regarding transport, to
enhance support across Oxfordshire. Efforts continued to improve coordination
between council departments and external partners, as voluntary organisations
provide much of the community transport.
·
How successful
community capacity grant projects could be scaled up and their best practices
shared across Oxfordshire. The Deputy Director of Integrated Commissioning HESC
emphasised that scaling up successful projects is handled carefully to preserve
local creativity and context. What worked in one area may not suit another due
to differing community needs, so the council shared best practices while
supporting tailored approaches. Mechanisms existed to disseminate learning and
guide organisations whose initial grant bids were unsuccessful towards other
opportunities. The local area coordination model was cited as an example of
effective initiatives inspiring similar methods elsewhere. Overall, the council
prioritises organic growth and adaptation, encouraging the spread of proven
strategies without imposing uniform solutions, and ensuring outcomes are shared
and lessons learned across Oxfordshire.
The Committee AGREED to make the following
observation:
· That Manchester City Council’s provision of council tax relief for residents in end-of-life care represents a compassionate and practical approach to supporting vulnerable individuals. Members noted the potential relevance of such a scheme in the Oxfordshire context, particularly for residents experiencing deprivation.
Supporting documents: