The Committee has requested an update on children’s homes. The Committee has invited Cllr John Howson, Cabinet member for Children, Education, and Young People’s Services, to present the report and has invited Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Jean Kelly, Deputy Director for Children’s Social Care, and Charlotte Davey, Assistant Director – County Services, to attend and answer the Committee’s questions.
The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom.
Minutes:
Cllr John Howson, Cabinet member for Children, Education,
and Young People’s Services, attended to present the report. Lisa Lyons,
Director of Children’s Services, Jean Kelly, Deputy Director for Children’s
Social Care, and Charlotte Davey, Assistant Director – County Services, also
attended to answer the Committee’s questions.
The Cabinet Member introduced the topic of children's homes,
explaining the collaboration with the Department for Education (DfE) to
increase the number of small, family-like children's homes in Oxfordshire. He
highlighted the benefits of these homes in providing a more personal and
supportive environment for children.
The Assistant Director provided an update on the development
of new children's homes, detailing the progress of each home. Aspen House had
opened recently, accommodating four children who were brought back into the
county from out-of-county placements, and it had received a 'good' rating from
Ofsted.
Peak House was ready to open, pending an initial Ofsted
registration visit. Staff were in place and being utilised across other
establishments until the home could officially open. Willow Bank was expected
to open in autumn, following the model of Peak House.
Great Mead faced delays due to environmental concerns. Oat
Hill required significant internal and external work, with planning permission
and contractor issues causing delays.
The Assistant Director summarised the financial aspects,
noting that the homes were coming in on budget, and any under-budget savings
would be partially returned to the DfE.
Members asked about the current timeframe for getting
children's homes registered, noting the complexity and lengthy process
experienced in 2023. Officers advised that the process for getting children's
homes registered had seen some improvements. In 2023, the timeframe was around
19 weeks from the point of having all necessary paperwork ready. By 2025, this
timeframe had been reduced to approximately 12 weeks. However, it was
acknowledged that the process could still take longer in some cases, due to the
complexity of the registration process, including the requirement to have a
registered manager and staff in place before applying for registration.
Members inquired about the number of children in
unregistered placements and if Peak House could accommodate those needing Tier
4 beds for severe mental health issues or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD). The Assistant Director informed Members that the number of children in
unregistered placements has dropped from a peak of 15 to fewer than five thanks
to efforts to find suitable registered placements.
The Assistant Director also explained how Peak House was
designed for children who require intensive support and cannot live with
another child. The facility provided a safe environment for children with
severe mental health issues or PTSD and worked closely with Children and
Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to ensure their needs were met.
Members inquired about private providers buying properties
for children with disabilities, their registration process, and interaction
with the Council. Officers explained that these providers need registration
through Ofsted or the CQC, and they seek planning permission from district
councils.
Concerns were raised about using unregistered County beds
for children. The Assistant Director stressed adherence to registration
standards for ethical and legal reasons, ensuring high-quality care. The
Council used only registered placements and kept Ofsted informed for
transparency, while providing daily support from a multi-agency team to
children in unregistered arrangements.
Members inquired about expanding the children's homes
initiative and staff preparation for new openings. Officers stated the Council
would review current developments before further expansion to ensure positive
outcomes. The Council was also part of the Southeast Regional Care Cooperative
programme to manage residential care over the next three years. For staff
preparation, the Council had a recruitment campaign, with new staff undergoing
inductions in existing homes. Registered managers were appointed and assisted
in other homes as needed.
Members inquired about the number of children in various
placements (out of county, in county, in private homes) and progress in working
with neighbouring authorities for specialist care. The Assistant Director and
the Deputy Director of Children’s Services shared that the Council was caring
for 777 children, including 80 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Of these,
66 were in privately run homes outside the county due to a lack of local
specialist provisions. Oxfordshire had 99 beds in private settings, but the
Council faced competition and high costs for these placements. Progress had
been made through the Southeast Regional Care Cooperative programme to manage
residential care collaboratively over the next three years, aiming to maximise
capacity and ensure high-quality care in the region.
The cost differences between county-run homes and private
sector care was discussed, with the Committee
stressing that the priority should be children's well-being. The Assistant
Director noted county homes cost around £4,500 per child per week, while
private sector costs often exceeded £7,000, sometimes reaching £17,000 or £18,000.
The Council stressed the focus should remain on providing quality care rather
than solely financial considerations.
The Committee AGREED to a recommendation under the
following heading:
Supporting documents: