Forward Plan Ref: 2025/047
Contact: Helen Mitchell, Head of Public Affairs and Strategy
Helen.mitchell@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Report of the Chief Executive Officer
The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to:
2. Agree
to submit to Government the interim plan as set out in Appendix 1 and each
option for local government reorganisation set out in Appendix 2 to 4;
3. Agree
that Oxfordshire County Council proposes and supports as its optimal model for
re-organisation – a single county unitary for Oxfordshire as set out as option
1 in Appendix 2.
4. Agree
that as the constituent member of any future Mayoral County Combined Authority,
the Cabinet’s preferred geography for a Mayoral Strategic Authority is
Berkshire, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire.
5. Endorse the Leader of the Council to correspond with Government, setting out the County Council’s position with respect to local government reorganisation and devolution, and to hold meetings with Ministers on such matters in due course.
Minutes:
Cabinet had before it a report on interim proposals for Local Government
reorganisation in response to a statutory invitation by the Government
following publication of the Devolution White Paper on 16 December 2024. Since
the receipt of the statutory invitation, all Councils across Oxfordshire had
been working together on initial options accompanied by a single interim plan. The plan, and the three proposals, along with
the statutory invitation were included in the report.
Cabinet were addressed by a number of speakers regarding the report and
recommendations.
Councillor Bethia Thomas, Leader of Vale of
White Horse District Council, expressed appreciation for the constructive
engagement by her authority with Oxfordshire County Council on local government
reorganisation and devolution. She referred to the Government’s views of the
necessity for a mayoral strategic authority to enable authorities to access the
maximum benefits from devolution and supported recommendation 4 in the Chief
Executive's report.
Councillor Andy Graham, Leader of West
Oxfordshire District Council referred to his authority’s their unanimous decision to support a
two-unitary option for local government reorganisation. He emphasised the need
to protect local services and maintain a local voice for residents. He stressed
that residents needed to come first in any discussions around future options
for local government.
Councillor Graham acknowledged the
importance of financial sustainability but emphasised that councils should
serve residents and enhance communities.
Councillor Susan Brown, Leader of Oxford
City Council supported the creation of three strong unitary authorities in
Oxfordshire, emphasising place-based thinking and the importance of maintaining
a strong city and workable unitaries to the north and
south of the city. She referenced the statement by the Minister of State for
Local Government and English Devolution about the range of possible sizes for
unitary authorities and the 500K number being an average population, not a
minimum.
Councillor Brown acknowledged that there was
a lot more work to be done on the proposals and looked forward to working
together with other councils on the detailed proposals.
Councillor Ian Middleton, Leader of the
Green Party Group at Oxfordshire County Council, expressed opposition to a
single unitary authority, arguing that it would centralise decision-making and
reduce local accountability. He supported the two-unitary model as it would
maintain some degree of autonomy and recognise the character and needs of
different areas. He emphasised that Oxfordshire was a diverse county with
diverse local needs, which a single unitary authority might not address
effectively.
Councillor Liz Leffman, Leader of the
Council presented the report. She stated that the three
proposals presented for restructuring: a single unitary authority, two unitary
authorities including parts of West Berkshire, and three units which would
include Greater Oxford and parts of Berkshire would be submitted to the
Government. The County Council’s
preferred option was the single unitary authority, which the County Council
supported.
The
report emphasised the collaborative approach taken by the County Council in
discussing these proposals, involving various councils and stakeholders.
Councillor Leffman reminded members that the County Council currently delivered
85% of local government services, including crucial areas such social care and
highways, which would be impacted by any restructuring. She also referred to
the importance of maintaining connections between scientific campuses across
the county and the potential for devolving services to town and parish councils.
There would be ongoing consultations depending on the Secretary of State's
response to the proposals.
During discussion, members expressed strong
support for a single unitary authority for Oxfordshire, citing the benefits of
maintaining existing relationships, avoiding fragmentation of services, and
ensuring financial stability. They commented on the challenges that smaller
unitary authorities could face in funding services. There was the possibility
of devolving some services to town councils to maintain local delivery within a
single unitary structure.
Members also emphasised the importance of
including Buckinghamshire in the preferred geography for a mayoral strategic
authority, while noting that there were no current conversations with
Buckinghamshire. It was planned to progress discussions with Berkshire and to
include Buckinghamshire if they decided to join at a later date.
RESOLVED to:-
b) agree
to submit to Government the interim plan as set out in Appendix 1 and each
option for local government reorganisation set out in Appendix 2 to 4;
c) agree
that Oxfordshire County Council proposes and supports as its optimal model for
re-organisation – a single county unitary for Oxfordshire as set out as option
1 in Appendix 2.
d) agree
that as the constituent member of any future Mayoral County Combined Authority,
the Cabinet’s preferred geography for a Mayoral Strategic Authority is
Berkshire, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire.
e) endorse
the Leader of the Council to correspond with Government, setting out the County
Council’s position with respect to local government reorganisation and
devolution, and to hold meetings with Ministers on such matters in due course.
Supporting documents: