Ansaf
Azhar (Director of Public Health) has been invited to present the Director of
Public Health’s Annual Report.
The Committee is
invited to consider the report, raise any questions and AGREE any
recommendations arising it may wish to make.
Minutes:
The Committee Chair
outlined that the Committee would return to this item again in
the near future for the purposes of scrutinising the full DPH annual
report subsequent to its publication.
It was explained to
the Committee that this particular DPH annual report
and its focus on climate action and health did not emerge from a vacuum, and
that in late 2023, over 120 countries backed the COP28 climate and health
declaration. Additionally, the United Kingdom’s (UK) Health Security Agency
published reports in 2023 which outlined some of the health effects of climate
change on the UK. The Committee were also informed that major journals such as
the Lancet and the British Medical Journal had also highlighted the impacts of
the climate crisis on health.
The DPH annual
report emphasised that health was the untold story of the climate emergency,
but that this was surprising given the immediate and positive health benefits
for individuals, families and communities which could be delivered through
climate action. Climate action could be a means for achieving better
health for all people and for all ages.
It was highlighted
to the Committee that the DPH report explained the reasoning behind the focus
on climate change and health; and that an elemental approach was adopted which
included five domains including temperature, air, water, food, and nature. Local
evidence and data would be drawn on to outline what the impact was in
Oxfordshire in all the aforementioned areas.
Steps were already
being taken as part of climate action which could produce health benefits for
Oxfordshire’s residents. These related to the following:
1.
Creating energy efficient homes and buildings.
2.
Sustainable travel and clean air.
3.
Green Health and Social Care.
4.
Healthy and sustainable diets.
5.
Accessible green and blue spaces and nature.
The Committee were
also informed that the DPH Annual Report included a set of recommended actions
that revolved around two key areas including:
Actions that the
Oxfordshire System could embark on including: working
together for cleaner indoor and outdoor air; improving access for all residents
to safe and inclusive green and blue spaces; adapting and upgrading buildings,
estates and facilities; working with suppliers and the supply chain to reduce
carbon emissions; support the establishment of an Oxfordshire Climate
Mitigation and Adaptation Healthcare Network; build and continuously bolster
community resilience.
A call to actions
around national policy and funding including: reducing
air pollution by investing in low-carbon and climate-resilient infrastructure;
creating good, secure employment and reduce inequalities; improving resident’s
health and wellbeing by upgrading peoples’ homes, healthcare facilities and
schools; and boosting our physical and mental health by making it easy for
people to walk and cycle.
The Committee
enquired as to whether the DPH report would be explicit around the balance
between any national directives around climate action and health on the one
hand, and local concerns, nuances, or sensitivities on the other. The Director
of Public Health responded that broadly speaking, the work around climate
action and health was something that had to be undertaken locally within, as
well as with the support of the community. It was imperative to understand what
the specific benefits and needs of the local population of Oxfordshire were
when embarking on climate action. The overall reframing of health was
ultimately of significant benefit to the local community in Oxfordshire. This
approach was not stemming from a purely climate angle, but
was one that emanated from a local health and wellbeing perspective also.
It was also
explained to the Committee that there was also work around anchor institutions,
where all system leaders were being brought together. Within this context, an
outcomes framework around climate action and health would also be developed.
In response to a
query from the Committee around the level of stakeholder engagement taking
place around climate action and health, it was confirmed that there was
stakeholder collaboration with healthcare partners as well as with District
Councils in order to gain their input and views. There
was also input from the City and District Councils into the development of the
report as well as its recommendations.
The Committee
enquired as to what the end-product would be of the DPH report as well as its
overall direction of travel around climate action and health. The Director of
Public Health responded that the overarching message within this report was one
that would be conveyed not only at the local level, but that it would also be
adopted as a national lobbying effort to encourage further conversations and
actions around climate and health. It was reiterated to the Committee that
there was a strong commitment to close the gap between the two conventionally
separate topics of climate on the one hand, and health on the other. The
rationale of this report was to merge these two considerations into a more
holistic understanding and approach toward climate and health in a manner that
recognised the interconnections between the two areas.
The Committee
enquired as to whether there was any work with schools to help educate and
raise awareness amongst children at an early age around the importance of
climate action and health. It was confirmed that there was an outreach officer
who would work with schools around climate action. However, there was no
explicit work with schools that involved raising awareness of the
interconnectivities between climate action and health. The purpose of this
year’s DPH report again was to therefore to raise awareness of this disconnect.
The Committee
queried as to whether the pressures in the NHS were having an impact on the
wider system and the objectives and measures being taken by the Council’s
Public Health team. The BOB ICB Place Director responded that each NHS
organisation exercised transparency over their net zero plans, which could be
found on each Trust’s website. It was also explained to the Committee that the
Director of Place had worked closely with the Director of Public Health to
focus on reducing health inequalities countywide.
The Committee
enquired as to what was new about the message in the DPH report on climate
action and health, and how such commitments and recommendations outlined
therein would differ from some of the work that was already being undertaken by
the Oxfordshire system. It was responded that the County and District Councils
as well as the NHS had already been making existing efforts and arrangements in an attempt to reach climate action targets. However, what
the DPH report emphasised was the need for further integration of these efforts
to accelerate the reaching of climate action targets but to also improve how
the system understands the impact of climate on health. The Council’s Public
Health Team were also having conversations with Oxford Health NHS Foundation
Trust and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust around encouraging
active forms of travel for NHS staff.
The Committee AGREED to issue the following
recommendations to the Director of Public Health:
Supporting documents: