Cabinet Member: Highway Management
Forward Plan Ref: 2022/134
Contact: Odele Parsons, Senior Transport Planner.
Report by Corporate Director Environment & Place (CMDHM 5).
To seek approval of the Witney Local Cycling and Walking Plan.
Minutes:
This report
presented the strategic Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP)
produced for Witney. The LCWIP identified a network of walking and cycling
routes in and around Witney (including potential future routes) and set out
high level proposals for improvements to the walking and cycling infrastructure
which made up this network. These infrastructure improvements were intended for
development over a ten-year period to 2033 and would help to enable modal shift
from private vehicle use to active and sustainable modes of travel. The LCWIP
was also well aligned with the County Council’s nine priorities as outlined in
its Strategic Plan 2022-2025.
The Chair, Cllr
Gant – Cabinet Member for Highway Management, invited speakers to address the
meeting and responded to the points made.
Cllr Dan Levy spoke
in support of the approval of the Witney LCWIP.
Noting that the
active travel tranche 3 scheme intended to improve the public realm to make the
High Street a more accessible, pleasant environment for people to walk, cycle
and spend time, Cllr Levy enquired as to whether any of the policies in the
LCWIP could be delivered through that scheme.
The Senior
Transport Planner responded that the High Street and Market Square schemes had
similar objectives and the pertaining active travel schemes were likely to be
within the first of the LCWIP schemes to be delivered.
The Chair welcomed
the report and thanked officers, in particular Odele Parsons,
Senior Transport Planner, for the work that had gone into this proposal. The
Chair felt the plan was extremely thorough and an excellent example of
coproduction and constructive local engagement in the design of a scheme. The
plan was also clearly aligned to the introduction of 20mph speed limits across
Witney.
The Chair was
pleased to note the reference to walking and wheeling in the report, reflecting
the Council’s commitment to making networks accessible for all.
The Chair also
welcomed the inclusion of cycle parking in the report.
The Chair noted and
addressed responses to the consultation.
A
number of respondents
took the view that funding for the plan could be better spent on other areas.
The Chair’s response was that the Council’s policy of bringing forward LCWIPs
facilitated access to funding opportunities from a variety of sources,
including government grants, for schemes that delivered on national priorities
such as increased walking and cycling.
The Chair invited
officers to address the potential loss of vegetation and green space that may
result from implementation of some proposals. Officers explained that the plan
would avoid using green space where possible, but as each individual scheme was
designed some grass verges may be lost to accommodate widened paths and other
infrastructure. The loss of vegetation would be considered as a last resort and
weighed against the benefits from increased active travel over motor vehicle
use. Each scheme would undergo consultation and a Climate Impact Assessment and
opportunities to increase vegetation or plant trees would be sought. Some
schemes would also improve and increase access to green space.
In response to some
objections received through the consultation, the Chair cited a report
published by DfT (2020) which stated that there could be up to a 40% increase
in shopping footfall from walking infrastructure improvements. This reflected
the Council’s belief that an enhanced public realm and cycling and walking
infrastructure was better for the local economy.
The Chair
highlighted that the policies within the plan were iterative and more could be
brought forward as the scheme matured and evolved. Officers reiterated that the
consultation highlighted a number of additional
schemes and elements which could be considered in future iterations of the
LCWIP. There was regular liaison with district and town councils regarding such
matters.
The report referenced
the potential cycle route between Witney and Eynsham via the A40. The Chair
enquired whether consideration was given to a leisure route between Witney and
Eynsham. Officers stated that this had not been considered within the Witney
LCWIP but as the strategic development area in west Eynsham came forward the
route would be covered.
A response from
West Oxfordshire District Council and a query from the Creative Community
Connector regarding funding for a bridleway between Deer Park Road and Downs Road
and Deer Park Road, south of Range Road linking Deer Park Road and the
Bridleway was received. The Chair requested that officers respond and provide
clarification regarding funding for these proposals.
The Chair wished to
express his gratitude to the Windrush Bike Project and its excellent advocacy
for such projects. The Chair asked that officers give due regard to the
comments submitted by Windrush.
The Chair noted the
response from the Witney Traffic Advisory Committee
Officers confirmed
that the consultation responses had been fully considered and incorporated into
this version of the LCWIP.
The Cabinet Member
for Highway Management APPROVED the Witney Local Cycling and Walking
Infrastructure Plan.
Supporting documents: