Forward Plan Ref: 2020/035
Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Interim Director for Community Operations (CMDE11).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation to extend the 40mph speed limit on the
northbound carriageway of the A41 on the approach to its roundabout junction
with Vendee Drive and also to introduce a 50mph speed limit to the south of the
extended 40mph put forward following a
review of the recent accident history and specifically at the A41 roundabout
junction with Vendee Drive, where there has been a significant record of injury
accidents involving northbound vehicles on the A41 travelling at excessive
speed and, if approved, would be funded by the Road Safety budget within the
County Council’s Capital programme.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE11) responses received to a statutory consultation to
extend the 40mph speed limit on the northbound carriageway of the A41 on the
approach to its roundabout junction with Vendee Drive and also to introduce a
50mph speed limit to the south of the extended 40mph put forward following a review of the recent accident history and
specifically at the A41 roundabout junction with Vendee Drive, where there had
been a significant record of injury accidents involving northbound vehicles on
the A41 travelling at excessive speed.
Tim Hibbert
(Wendlebury PC) advised that Wendlebury was a small village of 180 households with no street lighting, or pavements and was a vibrant
community that tried to maintain a quality of rural life. It was vital that the
current physical containment of the village was understood. The M40 to the
West, the A41 to the North and the Chiltern Railway line to the South. Junction 9 fell within the parish boundary as
well as part of the A41. The remainder of the A41 fell within the parameters of
Chesterton Parish Council, the neighbouring Parish. To set the context in relation to the
proposed speed reductions in this report the A41 and Bicester itself were
already experiencing operational stress and a number of serious collisions and
fatalities had been reported at the A41/Vendee Drive junction and on the A41
near Wendlebury in recent years. Both Junctions 9 and 10 of the M40 were
already operating at capacity and when accidents occurred, significant queueing
and rat running occurred on surrounding roads. Wendlebury suffered from severe
‘rat running’ through the village from traffic being diverted to avoid Junction
9. For safety reasons, the Parish Council, supported by OCC had introduced a
speed limit of 20 mph. There were a number of major commercial developments as
part of Cherwell Local Plan Policy Bicester 10, not only on the A41, but
particularly adjacent to the Vendee Drive roundabout. The Parish Council was
particularly concerned with the real impact of traffic congestion from these
developments as they would inevitably generate a significant amount of extra
travel.
Their concerns over the proposals centred on an
absence of appropriate data which prevented the PC being in a position to
make a judgement. A further concern was there was no information to show that
the impact of developments around the Vendee Drive roundabout had been
considered, or the impact of Tritax Symmetry
warehouse proposals. To what extent had the traffic from the future
developments been taken into account? Enforcement options were also
critical, to help us make a judgement it would have been helpful to see this
data as well. Had a cost benefit analysis been carried out? In August 2018,
there was a fatal accident on the A41 by the pedestrian crossing at Wendlebury.
The Inquest concluded that death was caused by excessive speed. Following that
accident, OCC were to look at proposals for a bridge crossing, funded by a
third party. To date there had been no progress some 20 months later.
In summary the Parish Council supported a comprehensive review
of the A41 from Junction 9 to Vendee Drive roundabout but saw the rebuilding of
this roundabout as the priority to improving traffic management. The committee
report talked about this in vague terms, with no indication of time scale or
funding. They had been unable to comment
on the proposals due to the lack of evidence and enforcement options. Had this
been available, they could have offered a clearer response. The question also
arose as to why only one side of the A41? Also had the traffic impact of all
the potential developments being considered?
County
Councillor Ian Corkin referred to the well documented history regarding the section of the A41 from Junction 9 of the M40 and the roundabout at
Vendee Drive. In more normal times, the route was very well
used for traffic accessing Bicester with a history of speeding and the Vendee
Drive roundabout was recognised by very many local residents as being poorly
designed and difficult to use. The immediate area around it had increasing
levels of significant development, as well as the entrance and exit to Bicester
Park & Ride. In the past couple of years, there had been 3 fatal road
traffic collisions on this short stretch of the A41, the most recent a double
fatality on the roundabout itself between a vehicle using the roundabout and
another entering it from the north bound leg of the A41. Having discussed the
issues on numerous occasions with Oxfordshire County Council officers and
Thames Valley Police, he had no doubt at all that these changes would make a
very significant improvement to this section and he strongly supported them, as
did many local residents. Not only would it improve the layout and
signage, but also facilitate space for active speed enforcement, something
that could not currently take place on this stretch of road. He also
welcomed Thames Valley Police’s commitment to make sure that this happened on a
regular basis.
He accepted that this was only a very small
part of the overall solution needed on the A41 through Bicester and he would
continue to pursue those, including the ongoing Options Report that was looking
at the specific issues by the Wendlebury bus stops, the wider A41 Bicester
review, the emerging Bicester active transport strategy and the work by
officers to tie this in with the actual and proposed development around this
stretch of the A41. A much more holistic solution would be required to
satisfy all of the safety concerns of local residents, and he concurred with
the comments from Wendlebury PC that this was not happening quickly enough.
However, the question for today was would this specific proposal help or hinder
the aim of making the A41 safer for all residents to use and the resounding
answer to that was that it would and in endorsing the officer recommendation
asked that it be approved.
County
Councillors Les Sibley (Bicester West), Michael Waine (Bicester
Town) and Lawrie Stratford (Bicester North) submitted the following joint statement to say reducing the speed
limits from J9 heading North on the A41 to the Vendee Drive
roundabout would have minimal if any benefits at this time.
Most traffic accidents occurred at either the poorly designed 7 arm Vendee
Drive roundabout or the A41 Pioneer Way/Premier Inn traffic light
junction. Following the A41 Safety and Audit review Highway Officers were
currently looking into various options to help improve road safety at these
accident hot spots as a priority and so they were reluctantly
suggesting that the proposed extension of speed limits be deferred until
the various issues regarding the A41 Vendee Drive roundabout, the access
and exit issues of the Bicester Park & Ride, the A41 Pioneer Way/
Premier Inn traffic light junction, and the impact of cumulative
development in the area on the local road network had been addressed and
that should happen as a matter of urgency. Additionally, they were still
waiting for an update particularly with regards to the status of the
proposed Bicester South East Link Road and the proposed route for the Oxford -
Cambridge Express way which would have a major impact on Bicester's road
network.
The Cabinet Member thanked everyone for their full and
comprehensive submissions. She understood from officers that the
intention was to have a comprehensive review of this area including the Vendee
Drive roundabout which would include further developments proposed for that
area and officers would ensure future engagement with local stakeholders
regarding that ongoing review in the longer term. However, this proposal had
been a specific response to a number of serious traffic incidents including 3
fatalities to achieve an immediate safety gain and as such would be funded by the Road Safety budget
within the County Council’s Capital programme. Therefore, having regard
to the information set out in the report before her and the representations
made to her at the meeting including officer advice regarding the immediate
safety issues the Cabinet Member confirmed her decision as follows:
Signed…………………………………………..
Cabinet Member for
Environment
Date of
signing…………………………………
Supporting documents: