Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Emily Smith had given notice of the following question to
Councillor Lindsay-Gale
Councillor
Lindsay-Gale replied:
‘I have been in
contact with Hertfordshire and I have been told that the DfE will be paying for
the cost of transport for around 100 children from the Harpenden area for 2.5
weeks at the start of the September term until the new secondary school in Harpenden, Katherine Warington, is available.
Transport will be provided from close to the new school site to and from
temporary accommodation at the University of Hertfordshire in Hatfield.
Hertfordshire will be paying the
costs of transporting entitled children to and from the permanent school site
in Harpenden.
I have also been told that the
building work has not actually been delayed – I understand that mid/late
September was always the planned completion date which means there was always a
need for contingency arrangements of some kind.
I will be seeking further
information from Hertfordshire.
The Swan School is in temporary
accommodation on the Cherwell School lower site playing fields adjacent to the future location of the permanent buildings
and so there is no requirement for transport to another site. Only 1 child is
eligible for free home to school travel to the Swan School.’
Councillor Roz Smith had given
notice of the following question to Councillor Constance
“Why has the council not
installed an electric vehicle charging point at the front of County Hall?”
Councillor Constance replied:
‘Workplace electric vehicle (EV)
charging points (dual 22kW - wall mount unit) are installed at County Hall to
enable the upgrade of the County Council’s pool car fleet to EVs. A detailed
site survey carried out by the approved contractor Swarco UK Ltd identified the
rear of County Hall as the easiest and most cost-effective location for
installing the EV charge points. This was because the rear of County Hall
already had a dedicated power supply from old, outdated EV charge points installed
many years ago from an earlier trial, we just needed to upgrade the electric
cable to support the new points. To install an EV charging point at the
front of County Hall we would need to overcome the following issues, identified
in the site survey as follows:
·
Listed Status of County Hall including
the low boundary wall at the front – restricting us from installing certain
types of charge points.
·
Power Supply: A longer cable run was required
to get 3-phase supply from the mains meter room to the front, resulting in high
installation cost
·
Site security overnight: Not as
secure to park pool cars at the front of the building for overnight charging.
However, we are still considering the possibility of installing an electric
vehicle (EV) charging point at the front of County Hall, not least because this
would provide an opportunity to publicly
showcase the work the County Council is doing towards electrifying our
fleet. We are actively working with the installers to look at
cost-effective options and hope to install an EV charging point at the front of
County Hall in the near future.
Councillor Roz Smith had given notice of the
following question to Councillor Lindsay-Gale
Councillor Lindsay-Gale replied:
‘School budgets are under
considerable pressure in many parts of the country and within Oxfordshire.
Schools are being asked to do more and continue to raise standards of
achievement and attainment. We want to recognise the commitment of
Headteachers, staff, governors and parents in supporting schools and ultimately
children and young people. In some case schools are asking parents on a
voluntary basis to provide additional financial support for the school. This is
not just a recent phenomenon.
In April 2019 the Deputy
Director for the Department for Education‘s Funding
Policy Unit told school leaders that budgets for 2019-20 will leave schools
‘with real pressures to face’ as he acknowledged some schools would face
’tighter finances’. The Department is seeking to secure more money from the
Treasury for future years on the need to improve outcomes and social mobility.
Nick Gibb, the Schools Minister, told the Parliamentary Education Committee on
3 April 2019 that there is a case for more funding in education, and that post
16 and high needs funding is the priority. We are pleased that the needs of
schools are documented in that statement and that the pressure schools and
Councils are facing on the high needs block for special educational needs is
recognised.
This may refer to Lord Williams’s School Annual Fund Appeal. This school is an academy (and not an Oxfordshire County Council maintained school); thus it is regulated by the Regional Schools Commissioner and ultimately the Secretary of State for Education.
The school is asking for direct
and regular contributions ‘Regular
gifts can be made monthly, quarterly or annually for as many years as you choose and this helps the school plan ahead and make good
use of donation income.’ This request is to support the
school budget.
The Council is aware that
budgets are tighter in some academies and schools than in others.’
Councillor Tim Bearder had given notice of the following question to
Councillor Hudspeth
‘In light of the fact that the
official timetable from Highways England is that they will produce a short-list
of 6 or 7 expressway routes this Autumn for a non-statutory public consultation,
can you press The Secretary of State for an answer to your previous letter
with a follow up asking whether we are likely to get any indication
of his plans before the events unfold anyway in the official timetable.
Could you also send a copy of
the letter to new Transport Minister responsible for the Expressway, which
is Michael Ellis, so that he is also able to respond in his capacity
as the minister responsible for the expressway scheme.’
Councillor Hudspeth replied:
‘I am still awaiting a reply and as soon as
I receive one I will pass on to all councillors.
I am sure that the new Minister
for Transport has been briefed on the Expressway and has had
sight of my letter however given the current situation in Westminster it may be
wiser to wait in case there are changes within the Department.
I can assure Cllr Bearder that once the team
at the Department of Transport is known I will press the Government so that
Highways England stand by their own words in
the stage 3 report on page 17:
3.4.6
Reduced congestion along the A34 corridor would improve the quality of life for
local residents. There are residential properties
located along the A34 corridor including the section through Botley which is
subject to an Air Quality Action Area, which would directly benefit from
reduced congestion and delays.
I am sure
Cllr Bearder will work with me to ensure that
the residents of Westminster Way and Stanley Close
along with nearby roads do not suffer their current
inequalities enabling them to have a better lifestyle with improved air and noise quality along with reduced congestion.’
Supporting documents: