Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Cherry had given notice of the following two questions to
Councillor Constance:
1.
Has there been any progress in recruiting more road gangs to
repair potholes by Council highways contractors Skanska
Councillor Constance replied:
Skanska have allocated additional gangs
to respond to the increase in reported pothole numbers, this equates to one
gang in the North and similarly in the south. In addition to this where
resources permit weekend working is being undertaken
2.
After a Banbury Guardian article on Thursday 15th February
2018, can I be assured that the FixMyStreet depth and
width for fixing potholes has not been changed this includes highways officers
inspecting potholes that have been reported by FixMyStreet
or directly by local councillors.
Councillor Constance replied:
Official intervention levels for
footway and carriageway defects have not changed,
however, a small element of discretion has been introduced for the inspectors
to reduce the ‘pothole next to a pothole not being fixed’ type of enquiry
Councillor Howson had given notice of the following question to
Councillor Hibbert-Biles
Following this comment from
Ofsted in a recent report on a visit to a maintained primary school in London:
‘The local authority has provided some support to the school in managing
the manipulative and sometimes abusive correspondence and comments made by
email and across social media. However, considering the position the school
found itself in, and the fact that some correspondence appears to have been
coordinated, the local authority’s approach has been perfunctory at best,
stopping short of supporting the school in its policy position. Instead, the
local authority has positioned itself as a moderator to manage relationships
between the school, councillors and community groups. The expected level of
emotional care and public support for school staff from the local authority has
been too limited and, as a result, ineffective.’
What mechanisms
does this local authority have available to deal with any contentious
issues affecting a maintained school in Oxfordshire?
Councillor Hibbert-Biles replied:
“Through ‘Workforce Steering Group and
the ‘Oxfordshire County Council and Teachers Joint Committee’ a new social
media policy is in the process of being agreed. This will apply to all
maintained schools and will be available to academies to adopt or adapt as they
see fit. The policy will include clear guidance about how school staff should
deal with cases of ‘cyber bullying’ including the importance of retaining
evidence. Where schools buy into the Council’s legal services they can access
support where there may have been a potentially criminal act or, if short of
this, perpetrators could be written to requiring them to desist. In principle
this would be the same approach as adopted in the case of a vexatious parent or
member of the public who could be barred from a school site. Ultimately the
Council could take legal action on behalf of its employees, including head
teachers.”
Supplementary: Councillor Howson
queried how far the Cabinet Member believed that it was the duty of local
authorities to provide emotional care and public support for school staff when
a school faces unexpected challenges beyond its expertise to deal with under
the present arrangements for the governance of schooling. Councillor Hibbert-Biles indicated that there was a responsibility to
help and they did help.
Councillor John Sanders had
given notice of the following question to Councillor Constance:
"I am aware that the implementation of Controlled Parking
Zones (CPZs) in Oxford is a matter of controversy and
that the issue is being actively considered by this Council and
Oxford City Council. However, County Councillors in the City are
frequently being pursued by residents wishing to know what the Council is doing
to ameliorate the problem of on-street parking in Oxford and when this will be
addressed. Will the Cabinet Member provide
a timetable for CPZ implementation and when would this be
published?"
Councillor
Constance replied:
I am aware
of the concerns about on-street parking in residential areas in the city.
A number of new controlled parking zones are already in the pipeline, and
updates on the progress of these has been provided through the Oxford locality
briefing papers, which all Oxford locality members will have received.
However
there are also a number of zones across the city which are
not currently being progressed, but where we know there is concern about
on-street parking. Officers have prepared a draft programme setting out
how and when all the remaining zones in the city could be progressed, but some
discussion with local city and county members (including some prioritisation)
will be required before anything is published. I have asked officers to
ensure these discussions happen as quickly as possible. Funding will need
to be identified for any zones which are not already funded.
Supplementary: In response to a question about the
need for a timetable covering funded schemes, those where funding was still to
be found and plans for the wider area, Councillor Constance agreed that such a
timetable is the ideal and that they were working towards that but that it
needed to take into account that partial Zones created problems as the parking
issues moved to adjacent areas. As soon as more information was available she
would share it with Councillor Sanders. Councillor Hudspeth
added that the County would be having discussion with the City Council about a
contribution to the funding of such schemes.
Supporting documents: