Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Lilly had given
notice of the following question to Councillor Tilley:
“I am advised that a large number of children
are now attending our library’s for the excellent children’s reading programmes
recently introduced. How does this impact on children’s overall education?”
Councillor Tilley replied:
“Oxfordshire
Libraries have been delivering the Summer Reading Challenge since 1999, working
in partnership with The Reading Agency to engage young people across the county
to take part and so maintain their reading for pleasure throughout the summer
break from school. During summer 2015:
Alongside the
Summer Reading Challenge the Library Service offers other reading related
activities throughout the year: Children’s Book Clubs, young volunteering
opportunities, author events, class visits to branch libraries and other
seasonal, topical events such as our hugely successful Harry Potter Night
events where young people come into libraries to join in fun activities
inspired by books and reading.
“Research shows
that one of the most effective ways of helping children to reach their
potential is to engage them in reading for enjoyment. Children who read for
enjoyment make more progress in maths, vocabulary and spelling between the ages
of 10 and 16 than those who rarely read and young people who read regularly are
significantly more likely to attain a professional or managerial position than
those who do not read.” Clémence Pabion and Christina Clark: The
Impact of Chatterbooks on Children’s Reading Enjoyment, Behaviours and
Attitudes: Final report. National Literacy Trust, 2016”
Councillor Lilly had given notice of the following question to
Councillor Carter
“May
this council be updated on the disabled Blue badge Scheme and steps being
introduced to avoid Fraudulent usage.”
Councillor Carter replied:
“There are currently 25724 Blue Badge holders in Oxfordshire. Of these,
25003 are individual badges and 721 are badges used by organisations.
In the last 12
months (to 31st May 2016) 9087 badges were issued and 731
applications were unsuccessful because they did not meet the eligibility
criteria.
A pilot scheme for
Blue Badge Enforcement was carried out in late December in Bicester,
Banbury and Oxford City, focussing on a
number of designated disabled parking bays in those towns, and (with their
agreement) a number of major supermarkets in each town.
During the exercise
over 200 badges were checked by the officers involved, who were regularly
approached by members of the public with comments of thanks and support for
tackling this type of crime.
In the course of
three days, 10 blue badges were seized by the officers for blatant misuse.
These included cases where the badge holder was not present and the badge was
being used by persons not entitled to use it, using out of date badges and even
using the badges of deceased persons. In each of these cases, offenders have
been interviewed and legal action is under consideration.”
Councillor Howson had given notice
of the following question to Councillor Tilley
“Who is responsible for
prosecuting pupils attending academies, UTCs and free schools for
non-attendance at school and what part, if any, does the County Council and the
Regional School Commissioner play in the process?”
Councillor Tilley replied:
“The Council is
responsible for prosecuting parents of pupils who persistently fail to attend
those institutions.
The role of the
Council is to respond to notifications from schools of poor
attendance/unauthorised absences, issue warning notices and, if necessary,
initiate prosecution. In addition, the Council draws to the Regional Schools
Commissioner's (RSC) attention those schools which have notably poor levels of
attendance. The RSC's role would be best ascertained by asking him when he
appears at Education Scrutiny Committee meeting on 04 July.”
Supplementary: Nick Graham, Chief Legal Officer and Monitoring Officer
responded to a question about the approach to prosecutions in the light of the
High Court Judgement on the Isle of Wight case. He explained that as the
authorising officer for all prosecutions there was aCode he was obliged to
follow. In respect of attendance cases in particular there was considerable effort to try and remedy the
poor attendance and prosecution would only be considered if it was in the best
interests of the child’s education. He added that there was less control of the
approach taken by head teachers of academies but that the guidance to all
schools on fixed penalty notices was the same.
Councillor Patrick had given
notice of the following question to Councillor Nimmo Smith:
"In the
LTP4, it states that the location for a rail station in Grove will have to move
from the current site where planning permission was originally granted because
the recent alignment of the road bridge along the A338 means that they
cannot build it there now. As the Leader has already stated his support
for a station in Grove, where would he suggest would be the best location for
it to be built?"
Councillor Nimmo Smith replied:
“A preferred
location has not yet been identified as more work needs to be done with the
rail industry and the Vale of White Horse as Planning Authority. We have stated
the need to do this work in our emerging Rail Strategy.”
Supplementary:
Asked whether there was any timescale Councillor Nimmo Smith replied that
timescales were dependent on Network Rail.
Councillor Webber had
given notice of the following question to Councillor Hudspeth:
"Please would
the Leader summarise what he sees as the implications for County Council services of the recent Referendum
result?"
Councillor
Hudspeth replied:
Councillor Hudspeth referred to rumours circulating concerning deportation
and reassured members of staff that this was not happening. It was a case of
waiting for Article 50 to be invoked and to see what emerged. It was now clear
that there would be no emergency budget at this stage. There would be
implications of the volatile market on the Local Government Pension Fund but
these would need to be worked through over time. Currently it was a case of
waiting to see what emerged from Government and the EU.
Supplementary: In response to a further question Councillor Hudspeth commented that the Prime Minister had allowed Cabinet members to make their own choice, Now that it was over the Conservative Party was one party, comprising the Government of this country and focussed on getting the best possible deal for the people of this country.
Supporting documents: