Cabinet Member: Environment
Forward Plan Ref: 2015/119
Contact: John Disley, Policy & Strategy Manager Tel: (01865) 810460
Report by Director for Environment & Economy (CA7).
The report sets out the key changes to Connecting Oxfordshire, Oxfordshire's Local Transport Plan (LTP4), which was adopted by Council in September 2015, following full public and Stakeholder consultation. This report outlines the first update to LTP4, which is required to reflect the changed policy context and new and updated strategies.
Annex 1 summarises the main changes to LTP4.
LTP4 has been updated in 2016 in response to the rapidly changing national and local growth, economic development, infrastructure planning and funding agendas. Last year the county council resolved that LTP4 should be strengthened in its aims to reduce air pollution. Annex 2 sets out how the LTP has been updated to reflect this in more detail.
The Plan has been designed as a living transport policy and strategy framework document, to be kept under review and regularly updated as significant changes take place which affect transport in Oxfordshire. It will also directly inform the update of the Oxfordshire Strategic Economic Plan recently consulted upon and proposed to be completed this autumn.
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED
to:
(a)
approve the Connecting Oxfordshire update,
and to RECOMMEND it for adoption by Full Council at its meeting in July 2016;
and
(b)
note the contents of Annex 2 and to instruct
officers to undertake work to progress proposals for Clean Air Zones in
parallel with proposals for an Oxford city centre zero-emission zone.
Minutes:
Cabinet had
before them a report that set out the key changes to Connecting Oxfordshire,
Oxfordshire's Local Transport Plan (LTP4), which was adopted by Council in
September 2015, following full public and Stakeholder consultation. The report outlined the first update to LTP4,
which is required to reflect the changed policy context and new and updated
strategies.
Councillor Howson, speaking as local
Councillor expressed concern over the implications of railway plans that could result
in more night running freight trains and felt that other train routes could be
developed and that the possibility of air freight ignored. Referring to the
proposed bus gates at Worcester Street and St Cross Road Councillor Howson was
concerned that this would cut off local residents and he suggested that there
should be plans to revamp St Giles. He was disappointed that tunnels remained
an option in the current plan feeling that they were a relatively expensive waste of money.
Councillor Fooks speaking as a local
Councillor generally welcomed the plan but questioned the schedule for the A40
works. She also suggested that the proposed bus lane be extended to Witney rather than introducing dual carriageway. The
overall aim of the plan had to be to reduce congestion and there was a need to
make cycling more attractive. Councillor Fooks raised a number of detailed
points around freight transport, signage, air quality and parking.
Councillor Hards speaking as a local
Councillor referred to work on Milton Interchange which improved matters
travelling North from Didcot but otherwise worsened
the situation. He highlighted a number of local issues including concerns
around Phase 2 of the Orchard Centre development, the lack of proposals for the
northern perimeter of Didcot that needed some relief
from traffic congestion and concern that
the implications of the withdrawal of bus subsidies was not recognised
in the plan.
Councillor Patrick, speaking as a
local Councillor was pleased to see that much of the work of the cross party working group remained in the
plan. Councillor Patrick highlighted the bus and rail strategies and in
particular stressed the need for properly integrated public transport links,
including effective cross ticketing. She welcomed the news on Grove a Station
whilst recognising that there still remained a lot to
do and urged the Leader to start this work now.
Councillor Curran, Shadow Cabinet
Member for Environment generally commended the document but felt that some of
the good intentions were compromised. He referred in particular to the impact
of the withdrawal of bus subsidies that could lead to a lack of rural buses and
rural isolation. He also highlighted the Rail Strategy where he would have
wished to see the extension of the Cowley Road line on its original line.
Councillor Curran welcomed the work on work place levies and supported the
extension of CPZs. The work on low emission zones was welcomed but he stressed
the need to find the necessary staff resource.
Councillor Nimmo
Smith in moving the recommendations commented that economic growth was
dependent on movement of goods and the plan was about compromise and balancing
needs. Comments had been bout the need for choice and
the intention was to make all forms of transport attractive, working together.
Councillor Nimmo Smith stressed that this was an
update of the existing plan produced following consultation and that it was
intended to be a living working document. He highlighted a number of sections
in the plan where there had been changes including the higher priority placed
on air quality and the updated proposals for the A40. John Disley referred to
the A240 Strategy and requested an amendment which was agreed and is set out
below.
Cabinet generally commended the Plan
and thanked officers for their work with the A420 working group whose
suggestions had been included in the Plan. Officers were congratulated for
their work with Public Health colleagues that ensured that public health issues
were taken into account. It was noted that the plan relied on the support of
other organisations for successful delivery of the
Plan.
RESOLVED: to:
(a)
approve the
Connecting Oxfordshire update, and to RECOMMEND it for adoption by Full Council
at its meeting in July 2016 subject to the following change:
Delete the third bullet point on
page 10 of the A420
strategy document:
“A
new roundabout at the A420 junction with Coxwell
Road. This upgrade is partially funded by developers of nearby strategic
sites.”
Substitute with the following bullet point:
“A
significant junction improvement will be required at the A420 junction with Coxwell Road to accommodate known housing growth in the
area. The Highway Authority has been negotiating with
the developers through the planning process and a full signalisation of the
junction is an agreeable solution in
principle.”
and;
(b)
note the contents of Annex 2 and to instruct officers to undertake
work to progress proposals for Clean Air Zones in parallel with proposals for an
Oxford city centre zero-emission zone.
Supporting documents: