Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Rooke had given
notice of the following question to Councillor Tilly
'Can
the Cabinet member please explain why, given that an increase in births
happened and was known about four years ago, there has continued to be an
increasing lack of locally situated primary school places available to
Reception pupils in the north of Abingdon (a journey to the southern Abingdon
schools can take up to an hour in the rush hour), and what is being done to ensure that this problem is resolved to the satisfaction of
the effected families this year and not repeated in 2016?'
Councillor Tilley replied:
“The
Council has a statutory duty to ensure that there are enough school places for
every Oxfordshire child whose parents request one. I am proud of our record in
making sure that the Council always meets this responsibility, a boast that not
all Local Authorities can make. The Council also seeks to ensure that as many
parents as possible are able to send their children to their preferred schools;
this year nearly nine out of ten had their first preference met, that's over
7,000 children placed in their parents' first preference and over 600 more in
either their second or third preference. So although 335 more children were
allocated their parents' first preference this year, there are some who
unfortunately weren't allocated any of their preferred schools, including, I'm sorry to say, some in
North Abingdon.
The
Council was aware that there had been an increase in live births that would
translate into an increased demand for school places in Abingdon, as indeed it
has in other areas of the county, and has made sure that there are enough
places to accommodate all of them in September. In previous years a number of
schools in Abingdon have either admitted 'bulge classes' (Carswell,
Dunmore, St.Edmund's & Thameside)
or have been permanently expanded (Caldecott ) to
ensure that there's an overall sufficiency of places. This year, given that births data indicated there would be an
exceptional demand for places in 2015, all Abingdon schools, and particularly
those in the north of the town, were asked in November to consider whether they
would be able to admit a bulge class, either in their existing accommodation or
by having a temporary classroom put on site. The schools at that time did not
think that the demand they were then experiencing for nursery places supported
the prediction that there would be a shortage of reception places when the same
cohort reached school age, and no offers to take more children were
forthcoming. Early admissions data also suggested that there would be
sufficient places, but once the full set of applications data was available it confirmed the shortage of places. At this point both
St.Edmund's and Thameside
schools were approached as they were known to have sufficient
accommodation to admit a 'bulge class'; Thameside's
head teacher was able to agree this in time for the extra 30 places to be
available at the time of the first allocation round.
I
accept that Thameside is far from ideal in terms of
location but it is a good school and having volunteered to accommodate the
additional children promises to give them the warmest of welcomes. As
the school is over the statutory walking distance of 2 miles for children aged
up to 8 years the Council will provide free transport from home to school each
day, making a miniscule addition to the cross-town traffic and obviating the
need for parents to make a daily journey.
This
year has been pretty exceptional in North Abingdon and the live births data for
next and subsequent years show that overall demand north and south of the river
is likely to much more closely match the numbers of children needing school
places. The issue of some schools being more popular than others does mean that there may still be some
families in North Abingdon who won't be able to secure a place at their
catchment school and this is particularly likely to be the case with Rush
Common Academy. "
Councillor Howson had given notice of the
following question to Councillor Nimmo Smith
"How many traffic
incident (accidents) involving a] pedestrians b]cyclists
and c] vehicles have been recorded at the Frideswide
Square redevelopment between the start of the roadworks
and 16th May?"
Councillor Nimmo Smith replied:
“There have been 3 accidents – one involving a pedestrian and two
involving cyclists. They all resulted in slight injury.
However it has been noted that whilst drivers are asked not to overtake
cycles in the narrow areas there is evidence that cyclists are “undertaking”
cars which could lead to accidents.”
Supplementary: Councillor Howson
queried whether in view of the response Councillor Nimmo
Smith was suggesting that cyclists should wait in line rather than moving to
the head of the queue. Councillor Nimmo Smith replied
that it was a judgement for cyclists to make and they should do whatever they
see as safest.
Supporting documents: