Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Howson had given notice of the following question to Councillor Tilley:
“How
many Oxfordshire schools imposed fines for absence by pupils during the autumn
term of the current academic year; and what was the percentage of these fines
paid?”
Councillor
Tilley replied:
“During the Autumn
term (terms 1&2) there were 441 Penalty Notice Warning letters issued by
the Attendance and Engagement Team on behalf of Oxfordshire Schools. Of this
number 26 resulted in Penalty Notices being issued. Some Oxfordshire Schools
may have issued Penalty Notice Warnings without informing the Attendance and
Engagement Team.
There were 6 prosecutions taken between 1st
September 2013 and 28th February 2014 for failing to pay a Penalty Notice.”
Supplementary: Responding to a question on whether the
Cabinet member would make representations to the school commissioner and Ofsted
as to the very high non-attendance at St. Gregory the great school, Councillor
Tilley replied that the School Improvement officer had been sent into the
school to try and establish the underlying cause of the high absence rate . She had
further requested that an analysis of poor attendance be undertaken on a class
by class and year by year basis. This has been successful in improving
attendance in the past. Should this not
improve attendance, she would then consider contacting Ofsted?
Councillor Tanner had given
notice of the following question to Councillor Nimmo
Smith:
“In preparing for the 6 months of road works
at the Hinksey Hill and Kennington roundabouts what
consideration was given in the final scheme to improving the situation for bus
passengers, Park & Ride users and cyclists? Why are there no bus lanes, no
better access to Redbridge Park and Ride and no safer routes for cyclists in
the scheme? How much extra traffic will be drawn along Abingdon Road in my
division as a result of the increase in traffic on the ring road?”
Councillor Nimmo Smith replied:
“The
scheme when completed will deliver substantial improvement in congestion which
will benefit all vehicles, including buses, as the Abingdon Road/A423 is a key
bus corridor route. This will make getting into and out of the Park & Ride
site easier for cars and buses. As part of the Kennington Roundabout
improvements, a new subway is being provided under the ‘hamburger’ lane to
ensure the existing, good quality cycle routes between Kennington and Abingdon
Road/A423 are maintained. The scheme has previously undergone a full
consultation exercise back in 2012, and the results carefully considered to finalise the design.
An
additional scheme is being developed as part of the City Deal initiative, which
is aiming to provide a bus lane coming off the A34 northbound offslip at Hinksey Roundabout,
with the specific aim of improving bus journey times/reliability at peak times
along the Oxford/Abingdon corridor.
Traffic
modelling undertaken for the scheme indicates that residents on the Abingdon
Road using the Kennington Roundabout will experience improvements in journey
times at peak hours.”
Supplementary: Councillot Tanner
enquired as to whether the bus lane works would be carried out along with the other works
scheduled to finish in November or be implemented later, causing further delay
and congestion for the residents of Oxford.
Councillor Nimmo Smith responded that the funding available wass for the
current works being undertaken at the moment and that the bus lane would be implemented when
the funding became available.
Councillor Glynis
Phillips had given notice of the following question to Councillor Nimmo Smith:
“In the minutes of the 13th May Cabinet meeting in response to a
question I raised about the possibility of a pedestrian crossing on the A40 at the
bottom of Collinwood Road the Leader advised that he would investigate the
possibility of directing section 106 funding to this project. Can I be advised
of the results of these investigations”
The answer
supplied by Councillor Nimmo Smith was as follows:
“The general principle is that
S106 monies are intended to ameliorate the effects of individual developments
on existing infrastructure, in this case the highway
With no significant developments
in the vicinity of Collinwood Road then there is no specific S106 money which
could be used for this project
We are able to pool S106 monies
in Oxford so that larger strategic projects (such as Thornhill
Park & Ride extension and the improvements at Frideswide
Square) can progress, but we must still show that there is a relationship
between the traffic arising from the development and the project concerned. I’m
advised that officers do not consider that such a
linkage could be made in the case of a pedestrian facility for Risinghurst.”
Councillor Glynis
Phillips had given notice of the following question to Councillor Nimmo Smith:
“In the minutes of the 13th May Cabinet meeting in response to a
question I raised about the timetable for the rebuilding of the London Road in Headington the Leader advised that further details would be
sent to me about widening the scope of the original scheme as a result of
receiving additional DfT funding. When will this
information be sent to me?”
The answer
supplied by Councillor Nimmo Smith was as follows:
“The A420
London Rd Improvement and Maintenance scheme continues to be developed. With
the additional £0.491 DfT maintenance funding, we are
now able to deliver a more comprehensive scheme and therefore an appropriate
longer service life/durable carriageway reconstruction treatment is being
finalised.
The road
works are programmed to commence late summer 14 and be completed by late Spring
15 with a break of road works during the Christmas Embargo period.”
Supporting documents: