Venue: Virtual
Contact: Graham Warrington Tel: 07393 001211; E-Mail: graham.warrington@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Note: https://oxon.cc/CME210121
| No. | Item | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Petitions and Public Address This Cabinet Member for
Environment Delegated Decisions meeting will be held virtually in order to
conform with current guidelines regarding social distancing. Normally requests
to speak at this public meeting are required by 9 am on the day preceding the
published date of the meeting. However, during the current situation and to
facilitate these new arrangements we are asking that requests to speak are
submitted by no later than 9am four working days before the meeting i.e. 9 am
on Friday 15 January. Requests to speak should be sent to graham.warrington@oxfordshire.gov.uk
together with a written statement of your presentation to ensure that if the
technology fails then your views can still be taken into account. The written
copy of your statement can be provided no later than 9 am 2 working days before
the meeting – Tuesday 19 January). Where a meeting is held
virtually and the addressee is unable to participate virtually their written
submission will be accepted. Written submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Minutes:
|
|||||||||||
|
Oxford - Cowley Central Area (East): Proposed Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766
998704/James Whiting Tel: 07584 581187 Report by Interim Director for Community Operations (CMDE6). Following approval by the Cabinet Member for Environment at her 17th
December Cabinet Member Delegated Decisions meeting for the introduction of the
Cowley Centre (East) CPZ it has come to light that a petition submitted in
objection was not presented within the officer report and recommendations. In summary, the petition of 30 signatories (including lead petitioner)
from residents of Barns Road and Lockheart Crescent requests that: “We the residents of Cowley East Area would like to propose that the
County Council do not approve the two cars per household restriction, as we
believe it is unreasonable to limit residents’ ability to lead an independent
life and have flexibility to go to work. We also feel that visitor permits
should be free. Cowley East is a working families resident area and we feel
that we would struggle to afford your charges and ask your consideration as we
are already struggling to afford our basic bills. Vehicle allowance needs to be agreed per household. Possibly offer drop
kerbs where possible at reduced prices, spaces for residents more in need and
residents parking after 6-8pm.” It is noted that the petition while not objecting to the principle of
the proposed CPZ for Cowley Centre (East) raises issues regarding the limit of
permits per household and the equity of payment for those permits. Similar
concerns were raised by other respondents during the consultation and these
were carefully and comprehensively considered as part of the 17th
December report and decision. County officers consider the petition raises no
additional or new issues which might affect the Cabinet Member’s earlier
decision and that the scheme should now move forward to implementation. The Cabinet Member for Environment is therefore requested to consider
the content of the petition, determine whether or not any further action is required and if not reaffirm the 17th
December decision to approve the Cowley Central Area (East): Proposed
Controlled parking Zone scheme. Minutes: Following approval by the Cabinet Member for Environment at her 17
December Cabinet Member Delegated Decisions meeting for the introduction of the
Cowley Centre (East) CPZ it had come to light that a
petition submitted in objection had not been presented within the officer
report and recommendations. In summary, the petition of 30 signatories (including
lead petitioner) from residents of Barns Road and Lockheart
Crescent requested that: “We the residents of Cowley East Area would
like to propose that the County Council do not approve the two cars per
household restriction, as we believe it is unreasonable to limit residents’
ability to lead an independent life and have flexibility to go to work. We also
feel that visitor permits should be free. Cowley East
is a working families resident area and we feel that we would struggle to
afford your charges and ask your consideration as we are already struggling to
afford our basic bills. Vehicle allowance needs to be agreed per household. Possibly offer drop
kerbs where possible at reduced prices, spaces for residents more in need and
residents parking after 6-8pm.” County officers considered the petition raised no additional or new
issues which might affect the Cabinet Member’s earlier decision and in their
view the scheme should move forward to implementation. The Cabinet Member confirmed that she had a copy of the petition in
front of her for this meeting and that the full December report had been placed
on the website as a background document for this meeting and that she also had
a copy of that report. The Cabinet Member noted that the petition while not objecting to the
principle of the proposed CPZ for Cowley Centre
(East) raised issues regarding the limit of permits per household and the
equity of payment for those permits. Similar concerns had been raised by other
respondents during the consultation which had been carefully and
comprehensively considered as part of the report submitted to her on 17 December
and subsequently her decision and so having regard to that and the advice from
officers that the petition raised no additional or new issues which might
affect her earlier decision the Cabinet Member: reaffirmed her 17 December decision to approve the Cowley Centre Area (East): Proposed Controlled Parking Zone Scheme and for that to now move forward to implementation. Signed……………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing……………………………. |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan Ref: 2020/164 Contact: Eric Owens, Assistant Director Growth & Place Tel: 07799 097637/Naomi Barnes, Project Manager Tel: 07824 528681 Report by Assistant Director, Growth & Place, Communities (CMDE5). Low Traffic Neighbourhoods
(LTN’s) were proposed for Oxford in the Oxford Local Cycling and Walking
Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) as an effective way of promoting walking and
cycling, in line with Council objectives of public health, decongestion,
climate change and air quality. Temple Cowley, Church
Cowley and Florence Park (Cowley)
were chosen as priority areas in response to residents’ complaints about
traffic and to improve the cycle routes running through the neighbourhoods. It is proposed that the Cowley LTNs will be introduced using Experimental Traffic
Regulation Orders (ETROs). This allows the Council and residents to assess the
impacts before a decision is made regarding their permanency. The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to a.
note
the responses received to the preliminary consultation on the Cowley Low
Traffic Neighbourhoods b.
approve
proposals as consulted on for the introduction of traffic management measures
in the Church Cowley, Temple Cowley
and Florence Park areas in Oxford to create Low Traffic Neighbourhoods,
including the introduction of Experimental Traffic Regulation Orders giving
effect to the proposed modal filters within the LTNs, and associated waiting
restrictions. c.
approve
minor changes from the consultation proposals in the light of consultation
responses, namely:
i.
To
relocate the filter in Junction Road from south of Don Bosco Close to north of
Salesian Gardens entry
ii.
To
permit taxis and private hire vehicles through the traffic filters which permit
buses in Cornwallis Road and Bartholomew Road Additional documents:
Minutes: Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTN’s) had been proposed for Oxford in the Oxford Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) as an effective way of promoting walking and cycling, in line with Council objectives of public health, decongestion, climate change and air quality. Temple Cowley, Church Cowley and Florence Park (Cowley) had been chosen as priority areas in response to residents’ complaints about traffic and to improve the cycle routes running through the neighbourhoods. Therefore, it was proposed that the Cowley LTNs be introduced using Experimental Traffic Regulation Orders (ETROs) allowing the County Council and residents to assess the impacts before a decision was made regarding permanency. Charlie Hicks urged that the
recommendation to implement the schemes be accepted as hopefully the first of
many other LTNs across the city and county. He thanked County Councillor John
Sanders for his work in helping to deliver the scheme and also to many local
residents who had campaigned for this for over 18 months. The case for LTNs to him was clear and very
positive. Shortcutting traffic through residential streets was not inevitable
and residential streets should be safe streets and a place for community and
people to live and prioritising health. Zero carbon travel needed to be the
easy, attractive and safe default option.
As borne out by the consultation which showed over 70% of residents in
favour overall there was huge support for these proposals and he hoped that
those who were sceptical now would recognise the benefits once the proposals
were established. He understood the concerns regarding uncertainty over what
would happen to traffic levels and whether journeys would be more difficult,
especially if it meant traffic increasing on a few roads, which no-one wanted.
That was why it was so important that these schemes were introduced as an
experiment with all residents able to be heard when final decisions were made. He made a number of suggestions: 1. As well as red ‘Road Closed’ signs,green ‘Road Open’ (to pedestrians,
cyclists, wheelchairs, children scooting) could be placed on the planters too. 2. Signs introduced at entrances to the LTNs to let drivers know there
were no longer rat runs open to them, e.g. “Rethink Your Route” signs 3. In the first few weeks, while drivers were getting used to the new
filters and in order to help cars turn around safely at modal filters, perhaps
council staff or volunteers at the planters could help manage any cars that
needed to turn around? That would be especially helpful for the school drop off
and pick up at St Christopher’s and Church Cowley St James Primary Schools 4. Involve school leaders more closely in the conversation with planning
for LTNs and School Streets integrated together where possible. 5. Bring in the St Christopher’s School Street at the same time as the
Temple Cowley LTN so there would be no issues at drop off/pick up times. 6. Greater clarity given on how residents could give their feedback and input over the first 6 ... view the full minutes text for item 27/21 |
|||||||||||
|
Oxford - Oxford Road, Littlemore: Proposed Traffic Calming Measures Forward Plan Ref: 2020/153 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/Geoff Barrell, Senior Infrastructure Planner Tel: 07740 779859 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE6). The report presents responses received to a statutory consultation on proposed traffic calming measures on Oxford Road in Littlemore which have been put forward as a result of a review of alternative options for traffic calming following the decision by the Cabinet Member for Environment on 18 June 2020 not to proceed with a zebra crossing and other measures consulted on in February and March 2020. Funding for the proposed measures was negotiated from the development of the Lawn Upton House site in nearby Sandford Road. The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed traffic
calming measures as advertised but to consider retaining the existing northern
end buildout. Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE6) responses to a consultation on proposed traffic calming measures on Oxford Road in Littlemore put forward as result of a review of alternative options for traffic calming following an earlier decision by her not to proceed with a zebra crossing and other measures which had been consulted on in 2020. City Councillor John Tanner thanked
County officers for proposing two traffic calming schemes for Oxford Road,
Littlemore and listening so closely to local views, including those of Littlemore
Parish Council and urged that the scheme be supported. Traffic speeds were dangerously high off the
ring road into Oxford Road and that needed to be reduced, motorists discouraged from using Oxford Road,
Littlemore as a short cut to the Reading Road (the A4074) and the environment
made safer for pedestrians to cross to the popular Oxford Road recreation
ground. He also asked that the existing northern end build-out at
the junction of Oxford Road, Littlemore with the ring road be retained. A
flat-top hump was already proposed at this point but retaining the build-out would
prevent the loss of two much needed on-street parking places with the narrowing
encouraging traffic from the ring road to slow down. County Councillor Gill Sanders
spoke in of the measures proposed in Oxford Road, Littlemore. Traffic frequently exceeded the 20 mile limit
on this road particularly when coming of the roundabout on the ring road. Littlemore
Parish Council also supported the proposal as did a large majority of the local
residents. She had raised previously the
possibility of installing a 20 mile per hour repeater sign in this road to remind drivers that there was a speed
limit and unless reminded felt many of them would continue to speed despite the
installation of the road humps. A written representation from Sorcha
Ianham a resident of Oxford Road, Littlemore that the
proposal was the best solution to the volume and speeding traffic, bringing
about much improved safety to the residents of Oxford Road and those accessing
the road both pedestrians and drivers and was very much welcomed. The Cabinet Member for Environment thanked the speakers for their comments and having regard to the information set out in the report before her confirmed her decision as follows: approve the proposed traffic calming measures on Oxford Road, Littlemore as but with the existing northern end buildout retained. Signed…………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of
signing…………………………. |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan Ref: 2020/165 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/Elizabeth Bohun, Lead Technologist EV Integration Tel: 07774 335687 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE7). Provision of on-street charging apparatus for electric vehicles is reviewed in response to development proposals, assessments of demand carried out by officers and requests received from external bodies. Current proposals for charging points are delivered under the Go Ultra Low Oxford (GULO) strand of projects, which is funded by the Office for Zero Emission Vehicles and Oxford City Council and delivered in partnership with Oxfordshire County Council. T-GULO provides rapid charging for the taxi trade and O-GULO provides fast charging for car clubs and residents without access to off-street parking. The charge points will be funded by the Office for Zero Emission Vehicles (OZEV) and Oxford City Council, with match funding contributions from EB Charging Lt and Franklin, under a revenue share agreement to cover operational cost. The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposals as
advertised for electric charging points for vehicles with the
exception of the proposal for Barns Road, which it is recommended should
not proceed in the light of the objections received. Minutes: Provision of
on-street charging apparatus for electric vehicles was reviewed in response to
development proposals, assessments of demand carried out by officers and
requests received from external bodies.
Current proposals for charging points were delivered under the Go Ultra Low
Oxford (GULO) strand of projects, funded by the Office for Zero Emission
Vehicles and Oxford City Council and delivered in partnership with Oxfordshire
County Council. T-GULO provided rapid charging for the taxi trade and O-GULO
provided fast charging for car clubs and residents without access to off-street
parking. The charge points would be funded by the Office for Zero
Emission Vehicles (OZEV) and Oxford City Council, with match funding
contributions from EB Charging Lt and Franklin, under a revenue share agreement
to cover operational cost. Having regard to the information set out in the report before her the Cabinet Member for Environment confirmed her decision as follows: to approve the
proposals as advertised for electric charging points for vehicles with the
exception in the light of the objections received of the proposal for Barns
Road. Signed…………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of
signing…………………………. Approved |
|||||||||||
|
ApprovedTrial of E-Scooters Forward Plan Ref: 2020/171 Contact: Eric Owens, Assistant Director Growth & Place Tel: 07799 097637 / Rob Freshwater, Senior Transport Planner Tel: 07775 007926 Report by Assistant Director Growth and Place (CMDE8). Oxfordshire County Council in its
role as Local Highway Authority agreed to take part in a 12-month long trial of
e-scooters within the county. The trial
is being managed at a national level by the Department of Transport (DfT) who legislated for their trial use as part of local
authority led hire operations on 4 July 2020.
This report (i) provides the Cabinet Member
with an update on the development of a rental e-scooter trial for the city of
Oxford, and (ii) seeks approval for the rental e-scooter trial to operate in
Oxfordshire. It also summarises a preliminary consultation with key
stakeholders on the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order (ETRO) measures
intended to be brought in to facilitate the use of e-scooters across Oxford. It
should be noted that private e-scooters remain illegal and cannot be included
in this trial. The Cabinet
Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to: a.
note
the responses received to the preliminary consultation on the trial of
e-scooters b.
approve
an Experimental Traffic Regulation Order to
facilitate the use of public hire e-scooters (i.e. electrically powered) on the
public highway across the Oxford urban area, including an initial launch within
the Headington area of Oxford. Additional documents: Minutes: Oxfordshire County Council in its role as Local Highway Authority had agreed to take part in a 12-month long trial of e-scooters within the county. The Cabinet Member for Environment considered an update on the development of a rental e-scooter trial for the city of Oxford and which sought approval for the rental e-scooter trial to operate in Oxfordshire and summarised a preliminary consultation with key stakeholders on the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order (ETRO) measures intended to be brought in to facilitate the use of e-scooters across Oxford. The report noted that private e-scooters had and could not be included in this trial. County Councillor Emma Turnbull broadly
welcomed the introduction of an e-scooter scheme in the city centre but had some
concerns about the basis of their use in Cornmarket Street. She supported
removal of the time restriction on cycling and introduction of a marked two-way
cycle lane down the middle of the paved area. Currently a bit of a free for all
she was concerned that the addition of e-scooters might well add to the
confusion for pedestrians. Adding a designated cycle lane down Cornmarket would
be transformative for cyclists, who currently had to use the narrow Turl Street or run the gauntlet of shoppers along New Inn
Hall Street and the side of the Westgate and so while welcoming these measures
urged that access to Cornmarket be kept under review. The Cabinet Member for Environment having regard to the information set out in the report before her together with the representations made to her at the meeting confirmed her decision as follows: a.
note the responses received to the preliminary consultation on the trial
of e-scooters b.
approve an Experimental Traffic Regulation Order to facilitate the use of public hire e-scooters (i.e. electrically
powered) on the public highway across the Oxford urban area, including an
initial launch within the Headington area of Oxford. Signed………………………………………. Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing…………………………… |
|||||||||||
|
Oxford - East Oxford: Proposed Secure On-Street Pedal Cycle Parking Places Forward Plan Ref: 2020/166 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/Craig Rossington, Senior Transport Planner Tel: 07880 945891 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE9). It is proposed to use money from the allocation from the Home Office Safer Streets Fund allocated to Thames Valley Police for the provision of secure on street cycle parking in eight streets between Iffley and Cowley Road from The Plain to Bullingdon Road. The report sets out responses to a consultation for provision of secure parking for 104 bicycles carried out in November and December last year. Whilst there were some common objections to the proposals in general as well as some specific objections/concerns about finer details, there was considerable support for the provision of additional secure cycle parking. The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposals as
advertised for secure on-street cycle parking in East Oxford except for the
proposals at the north east end of Regent Street. Minutes: The Cabinet
Member for Highway Management considered (CMDE9) responses received to a
consultation for provision of secure parking for 104 bicycles carried out in
November and December last year in eight streets between Iffley and Cowley Road
from The Plain to Bullingdon Road using money from the allocation from the Home
Office Safer Streets Fund allocated to Thames Valley Police for the provision
of secure on street cycle parking. There had been some common objections to the
proposals in general as well as some specific objections/concerns about finer
details but overall the report highlighted considerable support for the
provision of additional secure cycle parking. PC Jamie Howell from Thames Valley Police Safer Streets Team had started this process with the intention of improving the safety of the community it served. 44% of the offences in this area related to the theft of bicycles with Oxford itself traditionally having high levels of cycle theft. This area had significant levels of bikes left outside the fronts of properties with poor options for locking those bikes safely because of a lack of space outside properties or locations to effectively secure the bike. Having worked with partners in the city in relation to cycle theft and the national cycle working group ideas had been formed of where resources could be targeted and 3 main goals were set to try and achieve this through an ambitious mass bike registration push with a national database, free gold standard D-lock distribution (alongside best locking guidance) and the introduction of secure on street parking for cycles. Accepting that nothing was 100% effective these measures could help reduce the likelihood of a theft occurring and would support the City Council’s own program of street parking. This was a unique opportunity to provide something to the community, offering real value by adding an additional level of bike security in the St Mary’s ward. The Cabinet Member for Environment
having regard to the information set out in the report before her together with
the representations made to her at the meeting confirmed her decision as
follows: to approve the
proposals as advertised for secure on-street cycle parking in East Oxford
except for the proposals at the north east end of Regent Street. Signed………………………………………. Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing……………………………… |
|||||||||||
|
Oxford & Abingdon Various Locations: Proposed Disabled Persons Parking Places Forward Plan Ref: 2020/159 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE10). Provision of Disabled Persons Parking Places is reviewed when requested by members of the public with specific proposals assessed applying national regulations and guidance on the suitability of providing new bays or amending or removing existing ones. The report presents representations received to a consultation on various locations. The Cabinet Member for Environment is
RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed provision of Disabled Persons Parking Places
(DPPP) at: Corunna Crescent; Flexney Place;
Quartermain Close as advertised (with minor adjustments being made to
accommodate concerns raised in the consultation) and also to approve the removal of the DPPP
in Mill Street as advertised. But defer approval of the proposals at the
following locations pending further investigations: Bourne Close; Divinity Road
(removal). Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE11) responses received to proposals for the provision of Disabled Persons Parking Places. Imran Hussein a resident in Mill suppoted the removal of the disabled bay
outside number 20-21 Mill Street and conversion to a normal parking bay believing
the space could be used more effectively and easier for all residents. County
Councillor Emily Smith supports the proposal for Boxhill Walk, Abingdon
Having regard to the information set out in the report before her together with the representations made to her at the meeting the Cabinet Member for Environment confirmed her decision as follows: to approve the provision of Disabled Persons
Parking Places (DPPP) at: Corunna Crescent; Flexney Place; Quartermain Close as
advertised (with minor adjustments being made to accommodate concerns raised in
the consultation) and the removal of the DPPP in Mill Street as advertised; but defer approval of the proposals at the
following locations pending further investigations: Bourne Close and Divinity Road
(removal). Signed…………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing…………………………. |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan Ref: 2020/160 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704 / Mike Wasley, Principal Officer – Traffic Schemes Tel: 07393 001045 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE11). The report presents responses to a statutory consultation to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the Milton Road in place of the existing national speed limit, the introduction of traffic calming chicanes on Berry Hill Road and Milton Road and no waiting at any time restrictions at the A4260 Banbury Road junction with The Rise following concerns being raised on traffic safety by Adderbury Parish Council and funded through S106 and OCC Third Party Support Schemes Budget. The Cabinet
Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to: a)
approve the
proposed 40mph speed limit on Milton Road limit as advertised; b)
approve the proposed traffic calming chicanes on
Berry Hill Road and Milton Road limit as advertised; c)
approve the principle of waiting restrictions at
the junction of the A4260 Banbury Road with The Rise but with the restrictions
only to apply at times to be agreed following further local consultation with
Adderbury Parish Council and affected residents, rather than at all times as
advertised. Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE12) responses to a statutory consultation to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the Milton Road in place of the existing national speed limit, the introduction of traffic calming chicanes on Berry Hill Road and Milton Road and no waiting at any time restrictions at the A4260 Banbury Road junction with The Rise. The proposals had been formulated following concerns being raised on traffic safety by Adderbury Parish Council and were being funded through S106 and OCC Third Party Support Schemes Budget. Having regard to the information
set out in the report before her the Cabinet Member confirmed her decision as
follows: a)
approve the proposed 40mph speed
limit on Milton Road limit as advertised; b)
approve the proposed traffic calming chicanes on Berry Hill Road and
Milton Road limit as advertised; c)
approve the principle of waiting restrictions at the junction of the
A4260 Banbury Road with The Rise but with the restrictions only to apply at
times to be agreed following further local consultation with Adderbury Parish
Council and affected residents, rather than at all times
as advertised. Signed…………………………………….. Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing…………………………… |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan Ref: 2020/144 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/Adam Barrett, Senior Engineer (Road Agreements Team – Cherwell & West) Tel: 07919 175889 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE12). The report
presents responses received to a statutory consultation to introduce a 40mph
speed limit and 50mph speed limit on the A361
in place of the existing national speed limit and also bus stop
clearways at new bus stops being provided in conjunction with the development
of adjacent land. Funding for the proposals has been provided by the developers
of adjacent land. Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE13) responses received to a statutory consultation to introduce a 40mph speed limit and 50mph speed limit on the A361 in place of the existing national speed limit with bus stop clearways at new bus stops in conjunction with the development of adjacent land. Having
regard to the information set out in the report before her the Cabinet Member
for Environment confirmed her decision as follows: Signed………………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing……………………………….. |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan Ref: 2020/145 Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/Mike Wasley, Principal Officer – Traffic Schemes Tel: 07393 001045 Report by Interim Corporate Director Communities (CMDE13). The report presents responses received to a statutory consultation to introduce waiting restrictions at the junction of High Street with White Post Road and Wykham Lane at Bodicote to reduce the risk of obstructive parking put forward by the local member Councillor Arash Fatemian to alleviate parking issues at this junction and improve safety and, if approved, funded through his Councillor Priority Fund. The Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to
approve waiting restrictions as advertised at the High Street
junction with White Post Road and Wykham Lane at Bodicote along with an extension to those proposals by up
to 5 metres westwards on the north side of Wykham
Lane subject to a detailed site inspection. Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE13) responses received to a statutory consultation to introduce waiting restrictions at the junction of High Street with White Post Road and Wykham Lane at Bodicote to reduce the risk of obstructive parking. The proposals had been forward by the local member Councillor Arash Fatemian to alleviate parking issues at this junction and improve safety andfunded through his Councillor Priority Fund. Having regard
to the information set out in the report before her and the support of the
local member the Cabinet Member for Environment confirmed her decisions as
follows: to approve waiting restrictions as advertised at the
High Street junction with White Post Road and Wykham
Lane at Bodicote along with an extension to those
proposals by up to 5 metres westwards on the north side of Wykham
Lane subject to a detailed site inspection. Signed…………………………………………… Cabinet Member for Environment Date of signing…………………………………. |