45/19 |
Questions from County Councillors
Any county
councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working days
before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the Cabinet
Member’s delegated powers.
The number
of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is limited
to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions
submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the
subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other
councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be
the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the
despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule
of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which
is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor John Howson
“What is the estimate of extra
time required to travel from any point in North Oxford to Oxford Station using
the diversion route that was in place during St Giles Fair?”
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Environment
“Unfortunately it has not been
able to provide an estimate as we do not have any base data to compare the
extended travel with. The journey time also varies greatly depending on the
time of day or the day of the week.”
Supplementary question from Councillor
Howson
“Would the Cabinet Member
consider continuing the experimental traffic regulation order on Walton Street
in order to create a safer cycle route and if so I would be happy put in a
written statement of such a proposal.”
Reply from the cabinet Member for
Environment
“I would be
interested in seeing the detail of that proposal.”
Councillor Emily Smith
“There is growing concern in
Abingdon about the lack of progress on the Lodge Hill southern slips. Residents
and Parish Councils were told originally that a public consultation on the
designs for the slips would be put out to public consultation in Spring 2019.
The Vale District has now received two reserved matters planning applications
for North Abingdon and North West Abingdon sites totalling 625 new homes, yet
there is still no agreed design for the slips, let alone a contractor appointed
to build them as required by the outline planning permission before some of the
homes at North Abingdon are occupied.
Can the Cabinet Member confirm
that the slips are indeed delayed, the reason for this delay and what the
current timetable is? What action is the cabinet member taking to avoided North
Abingdon having 600 extra homes but no diamond junction at Lodge Hill?”
Reply from the Cabinet
Member for Environment
“Unfortunately, the Lodge Hill
slip road scheme has experienced delays, as Highways England (HE) has changed
their approach to the delivery of this scheme from that previously
experienced. This will result in the original ‘end of 2020’ date not being met. HE
are asking for much more detailed transport modelling. We also need to
undertake ground investigation surveys on HE’s road network and this requires
their permission (which has now been granted). This back and forth with HE has
all added significant delay to the programme. Due to the A34 being part of the
Strategic Road Network, any new scheme must be approved by HE, and therefore
OCC have to comply with all modelling (and other) requests. OCC and HE met on 5th
September 2019 to discuss the latest modelling and OCC is expecting a formal
response from HE over the coming weeks.
Officers have taken the view that
public consultation will only be held once HE agrees to the modelling of the
scheme. Until that point, the scheme could change, which might then require
re-consultation and unnecessary public frustration.
Subject to agreement with HE the
current programme for the scheme is below:
|
|
Start
|
End
|
|
Ground Investigation
... view the full minutes text for item 45/19
|
46/19 |
Petitions and Public Address
Minutes:
|
Speaker
|
Item
|
|
Derek Albiston – Resident
Windmill Road
Graham Smith – Cyclox
County Councillor Roz Smith
|
)
) 4 – Access to Headington
)
)
|
|
Louise Dodd – Resident, Harcourt Close
Armadeep Takhar – Local
Businessman
County & Town Councillor Stefan Gawrysiak
|
)
)
) 8 - Greys Road, Henley-on-)Thames
)
)
|
|
Ann Pritchard – Chalgrove PC
|
9 – Chalgrove, Monument Road
|
|
Carolyn Jessop – Resident, Kennington Road
County Councillor Bob Johnston
|
)
) 12 – Radley, Kennington Road
)
|
|
Hugh Thomas – Cassington PC
County Councillor Charles Mathew
|
) 14 – Horsemere Lane, Cassington
)
|
|
47/19 |
Oxford - Access to Headington - Further Consultation on Traffic Measures PDF 731 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2018/164
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director for Community Operations (CMDE4).
The report presents the outcomes of a consultation on proposals originally consulted on in 2016
for the Access to Headington project to introduce and amend various
Traffic Regulation Orders and other traffic measures. This further consultation
is required because the statutory two-year limit from the start of consultation to
implement Traffic Regulation Orders has been exceeded due to delays with
implementation of the project, but noting that much of the project had now been
implemented.
The Cabinet
Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposals as
advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE4) responses to a further consultation on proposals
for the Access to Headington project to introduce and amend various Traffic Regulation
Orders and other traffic measure. This
further consultation had been required because the statutory two-year limit
from the start of the original consultation in 2016 had been exceeded due to
delays with implementation of the project.
Derek Albiston a resident of
Windmill Road asked for consideration to be given to an extension of the
existing off-peak parking on Windmill Road.
The road was getting much busier and as an open straight road was
susceptible to speeding traffic. Extending parking could help with traffic
calming and alleviate the pressure for resident parking overnight. There was no
provision for disabled parking ofrhealth visitors to park.
Responding to Mr Albiston the
Cabinet Member pointed out that as there had been an objection from the
Windmill Road Residents’ Group on the grounds of parking pressure it seemed to
her that this could present an opportunity to reach a good compromise.
Mr Kirkwood agreed that it had
been a difficult balance but nothing material had changed since 2016 and
officers were of the view that the measures as proposed outweighed
inconvenience to residents. Any decision
to extend restrictions would require further consultation but confirmed that
the restrictions could be reviewed and that disabled drivers would be able to
park on yellow lines but not health visitors.
Speaking on behalf of Cyclox
Graham Smith considered that this had been a disappointing retrospective
consultation with no opportunity offered to discuss or influence the proposals
the design for which met neither the standards for cycle super routes or
premium route network paths or county council policy. Provision for cyclists
was inadequate and although cycle paths had smooth lengths it was uncomfortable
and incoherent with steep ramps, slopes induced at paths and drives, ironwork
in the surface particularly at the filling station at the bottom of Headley Way
and insufficient dropped kerbs. Consultation plans had been inadequate and
there was concern that there was no protected cycle route uphill on Headley Way
with pedestrians having to share space on the steepest uphill section between
Copse Lane and Bowness Avenue which was most unsatisfactory. There was also
conflict at the JR Hospital access between people cycling straight on and cars
turning left.
The Cabinet Member referred to
the objection from Cyclox and the additional submission by Mr Smith and asked
officers to respond.
Mr Kirkwood confirmed that while
some adjustments had already been made to specific sites the safety audit would
identify any other issues with the scheme on site which could then be
addressed.
Pat Mulvihill confirmed that the
Access to Headington scheme would finish in March 2020. An inspection would
then be carried providing an opportunity to look at specific items raised with
some resource available to address any issues.
He would take up the points raised by Mr Smith but confirmed that issues
regarding shared space on Headley Way presented ... view the full minutes text for item 47/19
|
48/19 |
Oxford, Rymers Lane Junction with Littlehay Road & Cornwallis Road - Proposed Traffic Calming PDF 728 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/115
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE5).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation to introduce a traffic calming raised
junction table at the crossroads junction of Rymers
Lane, Littlehay Road & Cornwallis Road in
Florence Park, Oxford put forward in
conjunction with Oxford City Council to help improve road safety for local residents.
The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
introduction of a traffic calming raised junction table at the crossroads
junction of Rymers Lane, Littlehay
Road & Cornwallis Road in Florence Park (Oxford) as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE5) responses to a statutory consultation to
introduce a traffic calming raised junction table at the crossroads junction of
Rymers lane, Littlehay Road
and Cornwallis Road in Florence Park put forward in conjunction with Oxford
City Council to improve safety for local residents.
Councillor Sanders advised that
this junction was heavily used as a rat run with on average 3 accidents per
year. While the design would slow
traffic to reduce injury risk there was a need to look at traffic levels in the
wider surrounding area.
The Cabinet Member for
Environment acknowledged comments made by a number of objectors regarding the
cost of the scheme but in the light of the information in the report and the
representations made to her at the meeting confirmed her decision as follows:
to approve the introduction of a traffic
calming raised junction table at the crossroads junction of Rymers
Lane, Littlehay Road and Cornwallis Road in Florence Park
as advertised.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing………………………….
|
49/19 |
Bodicote, White Post Road: Proposed Zebra Crossing and Toucan Crossing in place of Pelican Crossing PDF 308 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/069
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director for Community Delivery (CMDE6).
The report considers responses received
to a statutory consultation to introduce a zebra crossing (with a parallel
cycle crossing) on White Post Road at its junction with Sycamore Drive and
conversion of the existing pelican crossing on White Post Road 150 metres south
of its junction with Sycamore Drive to a toucan crossing. The proposals also
include the conversion of some existing footways to shared use footway/cycle
track to link these crossings for pedal cyclists and have been put forward as a result of an adjacent residential development.
The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve as advertised the
proposed introduction of a zebra crossing (with a parallel cycle crossing) on
White Post Road and conversion of an existing pelican crossing to a toucan
crossing (a signalled crossing for the use of pedestrians and pedal cyclists)
together with the conversion of parts of existing footways to shared use
footway/cycle track to link the crossings for cyclists.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE6) responses received to a consultation to introduce
a zebra crossing (with a parallel cycle crossing) on White Post Road at its
junction with Sycamore Drive and conversion of the existing pelican crossing on
White Post Road south of its junction with Sycamore drive to a toucan crossing.
The proposals also included the conversion of some existing footways to shared
use footway/cycle track linking these crossings for pedal cyclists.
Having regard to the information
set out in the report before her the Cabinet Member for Environment confirmed
her decision as follows:
to approve as advertised
introduction of a zebra crossing (with a parallel cycle crossing) on White Post
Road at its junction with Sycamore Drive and conversion of the existing pelican
crossing on White Post Road south of its junction with Sycamore drive to a
toucan crossing including the conversion of some existing footways to shared
use footway/cycle track linking these crossings for pedal cyclists.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing………………………….
|
50/19 |
Banbury - Bloxham: A361 Banbury Road Proposed Shared Use Cycle Track PDF 1 MB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/079
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE7).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation to improve and convert the above footway
link on the A361 Banbury Road between Bloxham & Banbury to a shared use
footway/cycle track and conversion of the existing signalled crossing for
pedestrians at Bloxham approximately 65 metres north of the Chipperfield Park
Road junction to a toucan crossing which
has been put forward as part of the wider traffic safety measures on the A361 and
funded by the Department for Transport. Although improving safety is the key
objective, the scheme will also help to encourage cycle trips as an alternative
to the use of private cars, thereby serving to help reduce congestion and
encourage active and low-carbon travel.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the conversion of
the existing footway link on the western side of the A361 Banbury Road, between
the junction with Chipperfield Park Road and Banbury (a distance of approximately
2.5km) to a shared use pedestrian & cycle track and conversion of the
existing pelican crossing on the A361 Banbury Road at Bloxham approximately 65
metres north of the Chipperfield Park Road junction to a toucan crossing (a
crossing that can be used by pedestrians and cyclists) as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE7) responses received to a consultation on a
proposal to improve and convert the above footway link on the A361 Banbury Road
between Bloxham and Banbury to a shared use footway/cycle track and conversion
of the existing signalled crossing for pedestrians at Bloxham approximately 65
metres north of the Chipperfield Park Road junction to a toucan crossing put
forward as part of wider traffic safety measures on the A361 and funded by the
Department of Transport.
Regarding the
objection from the British Horse Society Mr Kirkwood confirmed that the scheme
would use some local rights of way and low flow roads. The proposals comprised
improvements of existing pedestrian provision to permit use by pedal cyclists
and should not be detrimental or impact on equestrian use or reduce their
amenity.
Joanna Mellon confirmed that
although there had been incidents involving pedestrians and cyclists there had
been no incidents with regard to equestrian use.
The Cabinet Member acknowledged
that funding was being provided by the Department for Transport to improve road
safety and noted the information regarding accident records. Therefore, having regard to the information
set out in the report before her and the representations made to her at the
meeting she confirmed her decision as follows:
to approve as
advertised conversion of the existing footway link on the western side of the
A361 Banbury Road, between the junction with Chipperfield Park Road and Banbury
(a distance of approximately 2.5km) to a shared use pedestrian and cycle track
and the existing pelican crossing on the A361 Banbury Road at Bloxham
approximately 65 metres north of the Chipperfield Park Road junction to a
toucan crossing (a crossing that could be used by pedestrians and cyclists).
Signed………………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing…………………………….
|
51/19 |
Henley-on-Thames, Greys Road: Proposed Zebra Crossing PDF 905 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/109
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE8).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation on a proposal to introduce a zebra
crossing on Greys Road between its junctions with Greys Hill and The Close put forward to address concerns raised over
the safety of pedestrians crossing Greys Road between the pram walk on the Gainsborough Estate, The
Close, Greys Hill (leading to Sacred Heart School) and the shop.
The Cabinet Member for the
Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed introduction of a zebra
crossing on Greys Road, Henley-on-Thames between its junctions with Greys Hill
and The Close as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE8) responses received to a statutory consultation
on a proposal to introduce a zebra crossing on Greys Road between its junctions
with Greys Hill and The Close put
forward to address concerns raised over the safety of pedestrians crossing
Greys Road between the Pram Walk
on the Gainsborough Estate, The Close, Greys Hill (leading to Sacred Heart
School) and the shop.
Louise Dodd a resident of Harcourt Close had long campaigned for a
crossing on this very busy road and as a parent with 2 children who had
attended the Sacred Heart school for 10 years who had felt unable to let her
children walk to school felt qualified to press the case for provision. With
200 pupils the Sacred Heart school drew children from all over Henley which
brought an element of danger. There had been a school crossing patrol but that
was no longer the case. The school had limited play space and a crossing would
give safer access to Makins Field and, as there were no other crossings in this
area on Greys Road, would also benefit other facilities in the area such as the
scout hut and skate park. Noting Mr Takhar’s objection to the crossing she felt
a crossing would be benefit his shop and acknowledged there could be scope to
move it slightly closer to Pram Walk.
Mr Turner confirmed that the siting was on a recognised desire line but
moving slightly further north was an option.
Mr Takhar was not opposed to any increase in road safety and as his
children also attended the Sacred Heart school he was well aware of the issues.
However, he felt that the crossing would be better located further down Greys Road
by the scout hut as the proposed location would only benefit those crossing
from the Gainsborough estate area. There
would be no gain for people accessing the middle staircase as that was
currently blocked. The crossing would
undoubtedly affect his business as he had deliveries off Greys Road and
provision of dropped kerbs as suggested would not, he felt, help because there
was provision for threshold parking for residents in the flats above the shop
so there could be no guaranteed space for deliveries.
County and Town Councillor Stefan Gawrysiak felt there was an argument
for 2 crossings. A recent survey had
shown 4660 traffic movements in a 12-hour period with 356 crossings including
120 under 16s at this point representing a clear and absolute need for a
crossing. The consultation undertaken had shown overwhelming support from
Henley Town Council, the Sacred Heart school, Headway and a clear majority of
residents. There had been a long
campaign for a crossing and there was now clear evidence of need with a clear
desire line from the Pram Walk and Gainsborough an estate of 2/300 houses. The crossing would also serve Trinity School
and was looking to have temporary closure of the middle steps made permanent closed.
If the crossing was ... view the full minutes text for item 51/19
|
52/19 |
Chalgrove, Monument Road - Proposed Zebra Crossings PDF 531 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/113
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE9).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation on a proposal to introduce zebra crossings
on monument Road at Chalgrove put forward because of the development of adjacent land.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
introduction of zebra crossings on Monument Road, Chalgrove
as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE9) responses to a consultation to introduce zebra
crossings on Monument Road, Chalgrove put forward
because of the development of adjacent land for residential development.
Speaking on behalf of Chalgrove Parish Council Ann Pritchard considered these crossings
badly sited and presented a danger to pedestrians. The Parish Council’s
objection along with many others was based on safety grounds as well as being
visually intrusive. Residents were used
to the current layout feeling that the proposal would create more problems with
cars and that it was being promoted purely because of the availability of
developer funding.
Mr Kirkwood confirmed that the
scheme had been subject to a road safety audit and complied with national
standards. Acknowledging concerns regarding visual impact it was considered that
provision would be beneficial to safety and amenity and confirmed that the
design would be subject to an independent stage 3 safety audit when complete.
The Cabinet Member noted that the
proposal had been through an independent road safety audit with a further Stage
3 audit to be carried out on completion of the development. She acknowledged the concerns of the parish
council but residents of the development would be new to the area and,
therefore, not as familiar with the layout as current residents. Therefore, recognising
the need to maintain road safety and having regard to the information set out
in the report before her and the representations made to her at the meeting she
confirmed her decision as follows:
to approve zebra crossings on
Monument Road, Chalgrove as advertised.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing………………………….
|
53/19 |
South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse Area: Various Locations for New Disabled Persons Parking Places PDF 3 MB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/110
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE10).
Provision of
Disabled Persons Parking Places is reviewed when requested by members of the
public. Specific proposals are assessed applying national regulations and
guidance on the suitability of providing new bays or amending existing ones.
The report
presents objections received in the course of the
statutory consultation on the proposals to amend and introduce disabled persons
parking places (DPPPs) at various locations within the South Oxfordshire and
Vale of the White Horse areas put
forward following requests from residents for a DPPP following a check of their
eligibility applying the national guidelines on the provision for such parking
places.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
Disabled Persons Parking Places on Gainsborough Green (Abingdon), Kynaston Road (Didcot) as advertised but defer approval of
the proposal for Duke Street (Henley-on-Thames) to allow for further
consideration of this site.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE10)
proposals to amend and introduce disabled persons parking places at various
locations within the South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse district areas.
Mr Kirkwood confirmed that a number of
not objected to proposals had gone forward to implementation.
Having regard to the information set out in the report and
the representation made at the meeting the Cabinet Member for Environment
confirmed her decision as follows:
to approve the
proposed Disabled Persons Parking Places on Gainsborough Green (Abingdon), Kynaston Road (Didcot) and the not objected to sites as
advertised but defer approval of the proposal for Duke Street
(Henley-on-Thames) to allow for further consideration of this site noting also
that those application not objected to would be implemented.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member
for Environment
Date of
signing………………………….
|
54/19 |
East Hanney, Steventon Road - Proposed Traffic Calming Measures and Bus Stop Clearway PDF 982 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/033
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director for Community Operations (CMDE11).
The report presents responses received
to a statutory consultation on a proposal to introduce a traffic calming
build-out incorporating a speed cushion and bus stop clearway on the Steventon
Road, East Hanney put forward because
of the development of land adjacent to the Steventon Road at East Hanney.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
introduction of a traffic calming build-out incorporating a speed cushion and
bus stop clearway on the Steventon Road, East Hanney as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE11) a proposal to introduce a traffic calming build
out incorporating a speed cushion and bus stop clearway on the Steventon Road, East Hanney put forward
because of the development of land adjacent to the Steventon
Road.
She noted an email from the local
member Councillor Anda Fitzgerald-O’Connor stating that the East Hanney
parish council did not support the type of traffic calming proposed and had
submitted comments, which they felt had been totally ignored and not even
acknowledged. She requested the proposal be rejected or at the very least a
decision be deferred to reconsider the proposal. Regarding the Bus
Stop Clearway she added that there were no buses running along this road
and that the bus company at the present time had no intention of introducing
any services. These were very valid concerns and she urged that they be taken
into account.
Responding to the Cabinet Member Mr Kirkwood confirmed that this type of measure was being proposed
here because the type of road involved was better suited to this type of
calming measure whereas the A417 east of Wantage was
a different type of road more suited for line marking. Also there had been a desire not to narrow
access into Wantage whereas the Steventon
Road as a connecting road was better suited to this type of measure allowing
sufficient width to be maintained to allow larger vehicles and buses to pass
comfortably. The report had set out the
detail of the parish council’s response to the consultation which, while
welcoming plans to calm traffic entering the village, had expressed a number of
concerns in addition to the type of measures being proposed including increased
noise, air and light pollution and future maintenance. The bus route had been
funded by S106.
Noting that the parish council had objected to
the type of calming measure being proposed rather than the principle of traffic
calming and the response from officers as to why these measure had been
proposed the Cabinet Member for Environment having regard to the information
set out in the report before her and the representations made to her at the
meeting confirmed her decision as follows:
to approve the
proposed introduction of a traffic calming build-out incorporating a speed
cushion and bus stop clearway on the Steventon Road,
East Hanney as advertised while noting that the
objection from the East Hanney Parish Council had
been fully considered in the report and that the measures proposed reflected
current county policy.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member
for Environment
Date of
signing…………………………..
|
55/19 |
Radley/Kennington: Kennington Road - Proposed Traffic Calming Measures and Signalled Pedestrian Crossing PDF 693 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/107
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE12).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation on proposals to introduce pairs of traffic
calming speed cushions and a puffin crossing on Kennington Road, Radley which has been put forward because of the
development of land adjacent to Kennington Road at Radley for residential
purposes.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
introduction of the traffic calming measures and puffin crossing on Kennington
Road, Radley as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE11) responses received to a statutory consultation on
proposals to introduce pairs of traffic calming speed cushions and a puffin
crossing on Kennington Road, Radley put
forward because of the development of land adjacent to Kennington Road at
Radley for residential purposes.
Supporting the proposals Carolyn Jessop also highlighted a number of key points namely road safety for both pedestrians
and cyclists on Kenning ton Road; cost savings from permanent tarmacking of
grass/verge from Pebble Hill to Woodlands; flooding issues at Sugworth Crescent; improvements to pavements; resurfacing
roads and safety improvements including traffic calming and pavement
resurfacing on Sandford Lane. She supported further liaison with all parties to
work towards a successful and optimum solution.
Councillor Bob Johnston endorsed those comments. The pavement between
Pebble Hill and Woodlands was used by a lot of children narrow and very
overgrown and if cleared would be a huge improvement. Sandford Lane needed
resurfacing and the surface of Kennington Road equally in need of work. These
safety proposals were essential and the proposals before the Cabinet Member
were fully supported by the Parish Council and the other District Councillor.
Noting the concerns raised during consultation regarding noise and damage
to vehicles from speed cushions the Cabinet Member noted the cushions were
flattened and designed to accommodate larger vehicles at 30 mph. As such that should
not lead to vehicles slowing down or accelerating to negotiate them and as
other vehicles would be able to negotiate them at 30 mph the risk of vehicles using
other routes to avoid them was considered minimal. Another respondent had supported chicanes but
those were not suitable for buses. Therefore, having regard to the information set out in the report
before her and the representations made to her at the meeting while noting that
funding by the developer was reserved for the traffic calming speed
cushions and a puffin crossing on Kennington Road, Radley and that, therefore,
other issues as raised during debate would be a matter for local discussion and
negotiation the Cabinet Member for Environment confirmed her decision as
follows:
to approve the
proposed introduction of the traffic calming measures and puffin crossing on
Kennington Road, Radley as advertised.
Signed………………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing…………………………….
|
56/19 |
Witney, Highworth Place: Proposed Waiting Restrictions PDF 859 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/078
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director of Community Operations (CMDE13).
The report presents responses received
to a statutory consultation to introduce no waiting at any time restrictions on
both sides of Highworth Place, Witney including at
its southern junction with The Croft; the existing restrictions at the northern
junction with the Croft to be retained and has been put forward at the request of the local member in response to
concerns over safety and the obstruction of traffic arising from parking in the
area.
The
Cabinet Member for Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve proposed waiting
restrictions on both sides of Highworth Place, Witney
including at its southern junction with The Croft; the existing restrictions at
the northern junction with the Croft to be retained.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE13) responses to a consultation to introduce no
waiting at any time restrictions on both sides of Highworth
Place, Witney including at its southern junction with The Croft; the existing
restrictions at the northern junction with The Croft to be retained and put forward at the request of the local member
in response to concerns over safety and the obstruction of traffic arising from
parking in the area.
The Cabinet Member noted an email
From Councillor Laura Price the local member reiterating her support for the
scheme including financial and the serious implications for the local area
caused by inconsiderate parking. Recognising the clear case for this and the
funding by the local member she confirmed her decision, having regard to the
information in the report before her and the representations made to her at the
meeting, as follows:
approve proposed waiting
restrictions on both sides of Highworth Place, Witney
including at its southern junction with The Croft with existing restrictions at
the northern junction with The Croft retained.
Signed……………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing…………………………
|
57/19 |
Cassington, Horsemere Lane - Proposed Prohibition of Motor and Horse Drawn Vehicles, Revocation of One-Way Order and Weight Limit and Reversion of Status to Restricted Bridleway PDF 2 MB
Forward Plan Ref:
2018/189
Contact: Hugh
Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704
Report by Director for Community Operations (CMDE14).
The report presents responses
received to a statutory consultation on a proposal to introduce a prohibition
of motor vehicles restriction on Horsemere Lane, Cassington a single track road
linking Bell Lane within Cassington village to the A40. The road is currently
subject to a one-way order (the road being one-way from north to south) with a
5-tonne weight restriction. Concerns
have been expressed over many years of the adverse impact of traffic on Bell
Lane using Horsemere Lane to access the A40 and also the safety of pedestrians
and cyclists using the lane itself, together with concerns over the safety of
the junction of Horsemere Lane with the A40 and that vehicles frequently contravene
the one-way restriction resulting in danger to all users of the lane.
The
Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
prohibition of motor and horse drawn vehicles, the revocation of the existing
one-way restriction and weight limit and change of status to restricted byway
at Horsemere Lane Cassington as advertised.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE14) responses received to a consultation on a proposal
to introduce a prohibition of motor vehicles restriction on Horsemere
Lane, Cassington a single track road linking Bell
Lane within Cassington village to the A40. The road
was currently subject to a one-way order (the road being one-way from north to
south) with a 5-tonne weight restriction.
Concerns had been expressed over many years over the adverse impact of
traffic on Bell Lane using Horsemere Lane to access
the A40 and also the safety of pedestrians and cyclists using the lane itself,
together with concerns over the safety of the junction of Horsemere
Lane with the A40 and that vehicles frequently contravene the one-way
restriction resulting in danger to all users of the lane.
Hugh Thomas for Cassington Parish Council confirmed that while there was a
level of support for closure equally this was an important access route out of
the village with currently 500 cars using Horsemere
Lane. That traffic would have to go somewhere with closure inevitably causing
an increase in traffic at the signalled junction of the A40 with the Eynsham
Road, Cassington. Therefore, if closure were approved
then changes would be required to the sequencing of lights at that junction and
provision of a slip road toward Oxford to accommodate extra traffic. The opportunity needed to be taken to
consider an alternative approach and unless that was done the Parish Council
could not support closure at this time and would require Horsemere
Lane to remain open.
The Cabinet Member confirmed that
as consultation had taken place on the prohibition restriction the options
outlined by Mr Thomas could not be considered now.
Mr Thomas responded that in that
case the Parish Council could not support the prohibition and so would want Horsemere Lane to remain open.
Mr Kirkwood accepted that the
proposal would redirect traffic to alternative routes but was unable to say
exactly how that would materialise but it was inevitable that there would be
queuing onto the A40. In the long term
the proposal was to close the Lane with measures to accommodate traffic at the
A40 junction but that was an expensive scheme with no funding currently
available to do that.
Councillor Charles Mathew
referred to Horsemere Lane as a heavily used rat run
with speeding traffic often contravening the one-way restriction which had
precipitated his request for closure to motor vehicles and horse drawn vehicles
while retaining access to properties with one-way and weight restrictions
revoked. However, he acknowledged the
points made by Mr Thomas on behalf of Cassington
Parish Council regarding the need for a slip road onto A40 to support that
closure, which was something he had campaigned for for
a number of years.
The Cabinet Member for
Environment acknowledged that both Mr Thomas and Councillor Mathew had spoken
in support of closure but with slightly different views regarding the timing for
that bearing in mind provision of a slip road onto A40. However, that ... view the full minutes text for item 57/19
|
58/19 |
Heathrow Airport Expansion Consultation PDF 207 KB
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/143
Contact: Dawn
Pettis, Strategic Planning Team Leader Tel: (01865) 815320
Report by Director of Planning & Place (CMDE15).
The purpose of this report is to set out the Oxfordshire
County Council and Cherwell District Council proposed joint consultation
response.
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed
consultation response on the Heathrow Airport Expansion, as set out in
Paragraph (9) of the report CMDE15.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member for
Environment considered (CMDE15) a joint response on behalf of Oxfordshire
County Council and Cherwell District Council to a consultation on the Heathrow
Airport Expansion proposals.
The Cabinet Member for Environment
welcomed the fact that a response was being made to a scheme some distance from
the county area but one which would inevitably affect the area including the
risk of significant additional pressure on the County’s strategic road and public
transport infrastructure. Therefore,
having regard to the information set out in the report and the representations
made to her at the meeting she confirmed her decision as follows:
to submit the following response
to the Heathrow Airport Expansion consultation:
“1. Concern about how the strategic transport
network is going to be able to accommodate additional trips, which requires
proper consideration of how the impact on the strategic network is proposed to
be mitigated;
2.
How
investment in rail infrastructure (in particular) can be secured, for example
the Western Rail Access to Heathrow project, complemented by potential
strategic bus solutions linked to regional transport hubs;
3.
What
opportunities are being taken to build in innovation, for example in relation
to goods and servicing access to the site. “
Signed…………………………………………
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing…………………………………
|
59/19 |
EXEMPT ITEMS
The Cabinet Member for
Environment is RECOMMENDED that the public be excluded for the duration of item
17 in the Agenda since it is likely that if they were present during that item
there would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part 1 of
Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and specified in
relation to that item in the Agenda and since it is considered that, in all the
circumstances of that case, the public interest in maintain the exemption
outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
THE REPORT RELATING TO THE EXEMPT ITEM HAS NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC AND SHOULD
BE REGARDED AS STRICTLY PRIVATE TO MEMBERS AND OFFICERS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE IT.
Minutes:
RESOLVED: that the public be excluded for the duration of Item 17
in the Agenda since it was likely that if they were present during that item there
would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part 1 of Schedule 12A
to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) which related to the financial or
business affairs of any particular person (Including the authority holding that
information since it was considered that, in all circumstances of that case,
the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest
in disclosing the information.
|
60/19 |
Procurement Exemption - Community Action Groups
Forward Plan Ref:
2019/104
Contact: Rachel
Burns, Waste Strategy Manager Tel: 07789 877310
Report by Director for Planning & Place (CMDE17).
The CAG project supports local groups
to improve their local environment and community; reducing waste and energy,
promoting sustainable transport, local food and working to increase
biodiversity. In order to diversify
their funding streams and reduce their reliance on OCC funding they need to
establish as a new entity – a Community Benefit Society. Directly awarding a contract avoids the
issues with state aid that a grant would cause and allows the groups to
continue their great work while also meeting our ‘social value and sustainable
procurement’ aims of using local companies employing local people that deliver
skills and training to residents and improve community engagement.
The public should be excluded during this item because its discussion
in public would be likely to lead to the disclosure to members of the public
present of information in the following prescribed category:
3. Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any
particular person (including the authority holding that information).
The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to approve the procurement
exemption for the Community Action Group Project Oxfordshire (Limited)
Minutes:
The Community Action Group
project is a network of over 65 grassroot community groups supporting working to
improve their local environment and community by reducing waste and energy,
promoting sustainable transport, local food and working to increase
biodiversity. In 2015 the County Council
challenged the CAG project to diversify its funding streams and reduce their
long-term reliance on OCC funding. The network has developed a plan for
diversity and self-sufficiency and have established a new entity – a Community
Benefit Society. The Cabinet Member for
Environment was being asked to approve the necessary procurement exemption for
this to go forward.
Having regard to the information
set out in the report the Cabinet Member confirmed her decision as follows:
approve the procurement exemption
for the Community Action Group Project Oxfordshire (Limited).
Signed……………………………………..
Cabinet Member for Environment
Date of signing……………………………
|
|