Venue: Grand Jury Room, County Hall
Contact: Sue Whitehead, Tel: (01865) 810262 Email: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Godden (Councillor Johnston substituting), Councillors Hoare (Councillor Harrod substituting) and Councillor Stratford (Councillor Wilmshurst substituting). |
|
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes: Councillor Brighouse referred to written representations
which the Committee had received from Councillor Waine and members of the
public. The following requests to speak had been agreed: Councillor Sibley, Councillor Mrs Catherine Fulljames, Councillor Stratford. |
|
|
Written
notice has been given in accordance with the Council’s Scrutiny procedure Rules
requiring the decision of the Cabinet Member for Environment on 15 May 2014 to
be called in for review by this Committee. The following documents are
attached: (a)
A report (PSC5(a)) setting out the names of the
Councillors who have required the call in and the reasons given for the Call
in. (b)
The report
considered by the Cabinet Member for Environment together with an extract of
the minutes of the delegated decision session. (PSC5(b)). (c)
Additional information
provided in response to the call in (PSC5(c)): (i)
a copy of the SW Bicester Planning Statement (ii) a
summary of the consultation requirements for highways works Additional documents:
Minutes: Written notice had been given in
accordance with the Council’s Scrutiny Procedure Rules requiring the decision
of the Cabinet Member for Environment on 15 May 2014 to be called in for review
by this Committee. The Performance Scrutiny Committee
had before them: (1)
A report setting out
the names of the Councillors who have required the call in and the reasons
given for the Call in. (2)
The report
considered by the Cabinet Member for Environment together with an extract of
the minutes of the delegated decision session. (3)
Additional
information provided in response to the call in : (i)
a copy of the SW
Bicester Planning Statement (ii) a summary of the consultation requirements
for highways works Councillor
Sibley, speaking as the originator of the call in and as a local councillor
spoke in support of the concerns set out in the call in request. With regard to reason 1 Councillor Sibley highlighted the
lack of a properly constructed footpath and cycle ways and referred to the
planning statement for South West Bicester which supported such provision. In
particular he was concerned at the lack of a footpath on the South side of
Middleton Stoney Road and the position of the bus stop which put pedestrians at
risk. With regard to reason 2 on the
lack of proper consultation with local Bicester County Councillors he stressed
that these proposals resulted in a major impact from an agreed development and
consultation with local councillors was vital. With regard to reason 3 Councillor
Sibley detailed his concerns over the use of road humps including increased
traffic noise, vehicle damage, increased vehicle emissions and emergency
vehicles being impeded. With regard to reason 4 he noted
that the use of build outs with
priority traffic signs to control the speed of traffic was the preferred
traffic calming measure. Councillor Sibley referred to reason 5 noting that the characteristics
of Middleton Stoney Road with no houses fronting on either side of the road
lent itself to a speed limit of 40mph. He suggested that the new 30mph speed
limit was to accommodate the speed humps. He considered that had consultation
been sufficient the Cabinet member would have had information on this from the
Town Council and the local Traffic Advisory Committee. Councillor Mrs Catherine Fulljames, speaking as a signatory to the call in and as a local councillor indicated that she was not a Bicester councillor but that she represented part of this area and that a number of villages in her Division would use this road to get to Bicester. She commented that the current proposals for 16 road cushions was madness and noted that in her area cushions had been put in and then removed because of noise. The cushions would have a detrimental impact on the ambulances using that road to access the hospital. She considered that the cushions would result in rat running in the surrounding roads. She referred to the lack of consultation although noting that she was ... view the full minutes text for item 16/14 |