Venue: County Hall, New Road, Oxford
Contact: Julie Dean Tel: (01865) 815322; E-mail: julie.dean@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Note: Or on the rising of the Safer & Stronger Scrutiny Committee which ever is the later
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Integrated Risk Management Action Plan (IRMP) Fire & Rescue - Draft Forward Plan Ref: 2011/113 Contact: David Etheridge, Chief Fire Officer Tel: ()1865) 855206, Colin Thomas, Deputy Chief Fire Officer, Tel: (01865) 855206 Report by Chief Fire Officer (CMDSSC4). This report
proposes a number of projects to be included within the Fire Authority’s
Integrated Risk Management Action Plan (IRMP) for the fiscal year 2012-13. The proposals summarise areas where the
Service’s Senior Leadership Team believe service improvements may be achieved.
The proposals (in some instances) also take into account views from staff
within Oxfordshire Fire & Rescue Service following a period of initial
consultation in August 2011. To meet the requirements of the IRMP process, each
proposal is supported by evidence, validating both their inclusion and their
contribution to improved community engagement and community/firefighter
safety. Similarly, each proposal
recognises the prevailing economic constraints. The proposals
for the 2012 - 2013 Action Plan are as follows: Project 1: Business Continuity
Review Responsible Manager:
Area Manager – Business & Improvement Project 2: Recruitment &
Advancement Review Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Service Support Project 3: Road Traffic Casualty
Reduction Responsible
Manager: Area Manager - Safety Project 4: Olympics 2012
Pre-Planning Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Operations & Resilience Project 5: Retained Duty System
(RDS) Availability Review Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Operations & Resilience Project 6: Operational Assurance
Framework Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Projects Project 7: Data Sharing to
Improve the Safeguarding of Vulnerable Adults & Children Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Safety Project 8: Review of Incident
Command, Baseline Worst Case Operational Scenario Planning Assumptions. Responsible
Manager: Area Manager – Operations and Resilience Project 9: Improving Fire Control
Resilience Responsible
Manager; Deputy Chief Fire Officer These proposals,
if approved by the Cabinet Member for Safer & Stronger Communities, will be
adopted in the final version of the IRMP Action Plan 2012-13 subject to further
consultation & scrutiny. Each
project will be subject to close monitoring, reviewed every quarter and
reported to the Cabinet Member responsible for Safer & Stronger
Communities. The Cabinet Member is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed projects to be
included for further consultation & scrutiny in the draft IRMP Action Plan
2012/13. Minutes: The Cabinet Member for Safer & Stronger Communities APPROVED the proposed projects to be included for further consultation and scrutiny in the draft Integrated Risk Management Action Plan (IRMP) Fire & Rescue. |
|
|
Prioritisation of Consumer Complaints to the Trading Standards Service Forward Plan Ref: 2011/146 Contact: Richard Webb, Acting Head of Trading Standards and Community Safety Tel: (01865) 815791 Report by Director for Social & Community Services (CMDSSC5). The report sets
out a draft policy for Oxfordshire Trading Standards detailing how the Service
will decide the most appropriate response to enforcement complaints and
enquiries from consumers, businesses and other customers or agencies. A
decision is required on whether the Trading Standards Service should formally
adopt this policy. The Service has
adopted an 'intelligence-led' approach to enforcement, focussing resources on
those issues of high detriment to either an individual, a business or a
community. It does not have the capacity or resources to investigate every
complaint it receives. Complaints are
graded into 4 categories: Grade 1- Same
day response (Approximately 6% of all complaints). This grading is
reserved for the most urgent enforcement matters including: - Where
immediate intervention is required to prevent further loss or harm, e.g. a 'one
day sale' is taking place. - Product safety
risks could result in injury or harm to consumers. - Vulnerable
consumers are at at risk of exploitation. Grade 2-
Scheduled response (Approximately 35% of all complaints). Complaints fall
into this category when they are not as serious or urgent as a grade 1
complaint but the subject matter of the complaint falls into a service or
county priority area or is of sufficient potential impact to warrant further
investigation. Grade 3-
Referral to another agency. The most
effective course of action to resolve the complaint is a referral to another
agency for action, e.g. the business is outside of Oxfordshire, or the issue is
best dealt with by the Trading Standards Service local to the business's Head
Office, for example, a food labelling
query. Grade 4-
Intelligence only. The complaint
issue is logged, and used as background information to track any trends or more
general issues with either a specific business, product or trade sector. Complaints
originating from consumers or businesses are graded in the same way. By adopting the
Policy, we can ensure all complaints are graded in a consistent manner, and
those presenting the most significant potential risk are investigation as a
priority and the most vulnerable consumers are protected. The Cabinet Member for Safer
& Stronger Communities is RECOMMENDED to approve the Complaints
Prioritisation Policy as set out in Annex 1 for use by the Trading Standards
Service. Additional documents: Minutes: To approve the Complaints Prioritisation Policy in Annex 1 for use by the Trading Standards Service. |