Venue: Virtual
Contact: Sue Whitehead Tel: 07393 001213; E-Mail: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Link: video link to meeting
| No. | Item | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Minutes: The Minutes of thre meeting held on 16 July 2020 were approved and signed as a correct record. |
|||||||||||||
|
Questions from County Councillors Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers. The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response. Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time. Minutes: Councillor John Howson had given written notice of the following
question to Councillor Constance, Cabinet member for Environment: ‘With the reduced flow of traffic entering the City of Oxford from the
west, would you consider diverting traffic from Frideswide’s Square along Park
End Street and New Road to Worcester Street. Hythe Bridge Street, with its
narrow pavements where social distancing is impossible, could then become a
pedestrian route from Frideswide’s Square to the junction with Worcester Street
with the only vehicle access to local properties. This change would make a
secure cycling and walking route into the city centre. A temporary arrangement,
as with the recent experiment in George Street, would test the benefit of this
arrangement to both pedestrians and cyclists.’
Councillor Constance replied: ‘We recognise that footways are narrow and pedestrian flow is heavy
along Hythe Bridge Street, but we do not believe that diverting traffic in this
way would be a suitable solution at present. Traffic levels appear to be only
slightly less than pre Covid-19 and this diversion would need the recent
changes to the George Street/Worcester Street/Hythe Bridge Street junction to
be removed. The significant benefits for pedestrians and cyclists that have
been achieved as a result of this junction improvement would be lost and the
additional general traffic using Worcester Street south would have a negative
impact on buses and their passengers.’ Supplementary question: Councillor Howson asked whether in view of the
narrow footways and high pedestrian flow along Hythe Bridge Street there were
any solutions that the cabinet member could offer to assist with social
distancing particularly between Upper Fisher Row and the junction with George
Street. Councillor Constance replied that there were no current proposals but
that officers would consider Councillor Howson’s question and if there were any
solutions that presented themselves Councillor Howson would be kept informed. Councillor John Sanders had given written notice of the following
question to Councillor Constance, Cabinet Member for Environment: ‘Will the cabinet member explain how it has come to pass that after a
decade and more of fudge, error and delay this Council still does not have a
valid Minerals and Waste Local Plan, that is now to be postponed again by at
least two years to 2023?’ Councillor Constance replied: ‘The Council does have an adopted Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Part 1
Core Strategy. This was adopted by Full Council in 2017 and sets out the
vision, objectives, spatial planning strategy and policies for meeting
development requirements for the supply of minerals and the management of waste
in Oxfordshire over the period to 2031.
The Core Strategy provides the Policy on which the determination of all minerals
and waste development management decisions are made. The Core Strategy also
provides a policy framework for identifying sites for new minerals and waste
developments in Part 2 of the plan - the Site Allocations Plan. “We are now working on preparing the Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Part 2 Site Allocations Plan (Sites Plan). The Sites ... view the full minutes text for item 75/20 |
|||||||||||||
|
Petitions and Public Address This Cabinet meeting will be held
virtually in order to conform with current guidelines regarding social distancing.
Normally requests to speak at this public meeting are required by 9 am on the
day preceding the published date of the meeting. However, during the current
situation and to facilitate these new arrangements we are asking that requests
to speak are submitted by no later than 9am four working days before the
meeting i.e. 9 am on Wednesday 9 September. Requests to speak should be sent to
sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
together with a written statement of your presentation to ensure that if the
technology fails then your views can still be taken into account. A written
copy of your statement can be provided no later than 9 am 2 working days before
the meeting. Where a meeting is held virtually and
the addressee is unable to participate virtually their written submission will
be accepted. Written submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Minutes: The following requests to address the meeting had been agreed by the Chairman:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Bicester Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2020/068 Contact: Patrick Lingwood, Active & Healthy Travel Officer Tel: 07741 607835 Report by Director for Planning & Place (CA). The Bicester Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) is a detailed 15-year plan which sets out how to improve cycling and walking in Bicester. The plan includes a target to significantly increase cycling in Bicester by 2035 and the evidence of how this is to be achieved. There are supplementary plans with walking and cycling schemes provisionally costed at £40 million. The LCWIP fits in with and directly supports the Bicester Transport Strategy and Local Plan proposals and the wider agenda for the town, including continued emphasis on Healthy Place Shaping. The LCWIP will be a subsidiary document of the new Local Transport and Connectivity Plan, currently being developed. As well as cycling and walking schemes, the LCWIP includes policies which will impact on Council transport policy and procedures and future scheme design and prioritisation. Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to approve the Bicester Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP), including the Bicester cycle network plans. Additional documents:
Minutes: Cabinet had before them a report seeking approval of The
Bicester Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP), a detailed
15-year plan that sets out how to improve cycling and walking in Bicester. There was Councillor John Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for
Environment expressed disappointment not to see 2031 predictions for Cat D. He
noted that even with best case scenarios it was expected that there would be more
car traffic 2031 than today. He queried the lack of a milestone project plan to
enable councillors to monitor progress. He felt that the new developments had
not been built as fully low traffic neighbourhoods and may need some
modifications. Councillor Sanders also queried whether adequate resources
were in place. Councillor Yvonne Constance, Cabinet Member for Environment
thanked Councillor Sanders for the points raised noting that a timetable was
not possible as it would be necessary to bid for Governments funding. She added
that officers would look at the issue raised about the data on which the
developments in Bicester are based and respond directly. Councillor Constance introduced the report and moved the
recommendations. Chair, Oxford Cycle Network had written urging us to recognise
the value of this plan for cycling. Councillor Constance added that Robin
Tucker. Patrick Lingwood, Active Travel Hub Lead, detailed the
contents of the report setting out the context to the proposals that was aimed
at managing the future growth of Bicester. Councillor Stratford, Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care
and Public Health welcomed the concept of improved walking and cycling routes
primarily for people’s health and wellbeing and supported the recommendations.
However, he highlighted several areas where he felt that further work would be
helpful. Paragraph 9 of the report referred to the need for robust transport
solutions and he felt that for Bicester this required more than a cycling and
walking plan. He queried the assumption in paragraph 10 that many, if not most
of short trips within Bicester could be made on foot or by cycle. Councillor
Stratford felt that there was little evidence for this, and he highlighted the
needs of the elderly or disable who may need their cars in order to get around.
He highlighted the funding gap and the difficulties of securing S106 monies;
the problems in making an old town suitable for modern transport needs and the
difficulty of predicting the needs of people who were expected as the
population grew but who were not yet able to be consulted. Councillor Corkin, Cabinet Member for Council Business & Partnerships welcomed the proposals thanking officers for a comprehensive piece of work. He welcomed the focus on his local area and saw the breadth and depth of ambition expressed as a marker for the future. He particularly welcomed the connectivity to the rural area around Bicester that looked to Bicester as their market town. This would be important not just for the residents but for the economy of Bicester. He added that as a wider sustainability point only three of the parishes ... view the full minutes text for item 77/20 |
|||||||||||||
|
Cabinet Members: Deputy
Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care & Public
Health Forward Plan Ref: 2020/125 Contact: Sukdave Ghuman, Head of
Legal Services & Deputy Monitoring Officer Tel: (01865) 323852 Report by Corporate Director of Public Health and Head of Legal Services & Deputy Monitoring Officer (CA7). In July 2020 the government
introduced new powers for local authorities to support local outbreak
management. The report recommends that Oxfordshire County Council assumes
responsibilities under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restriction)
(England) (No.3) Regulations 2020 in order to ensure that any serious and
imminent threat to public health in Oxfordshire is necessarily and
proportionately addressed. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to: (a)
Assume
responsibilities granted under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restriction)
(England) (No.3) Regulations 2020 giving local authorities powers relating to
the control and prevention of coronavirus and; (b)
Delegate
powers to the City and District Councils in accordance with the above
regulations. Minutes: In July 2020 the government introduced new powers for local authorities
to support local outbreak management. Cabinet considered a report recommending that
Oxfordshire County Council assumes responsibilities under The Health Protection
(Coronavirus, Restriction) (England) (No.3) Regulations 2020 in order to ensure
that any serious and imminent threat to public health in Oxfordshire was
necessarily and proportionately addressed. Councillor Judith Heathcoat, Deputy Leader of
the Council, in moving the recommendations highlighted that this was a joint
responsibility between herself and Councillor Stratford as Cabinet Member for
Adult Social Care and Public Health. Councillor Heathcoat introduced the
contents of the report. A Health Protection Board had been set up to oversee
the development and delivery of the Oxfordshire Covid 19 Local Outbreak Control
Plan commenting that it was an exemplar of good local collaboration and would
ensure a co-ordinated response that was so important to Oxfordshire
communities. Councillor Stratford stressed that the
proposals were essential. He welcomed the overarching role for the County
Council but working with local District Council and parishes with the local
knowledge and approach an important factor in a successful approach to any
local outbreak. During discussion Cabinet welcomed the
recommendations and the joint approach being taken. Councillor Corkin, Cabinet
Member for Council Business & Partnerships commented that using local
knowledge at all levels would be important in a bid to bring the most and
appropriate effective but lightest of touches to avoid heavy local
restrictions. RESOLVED: to: (a) assume responsibilities granted under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restriction) (England) (No.3) Regulations 2020 giving local authorities powers relating to the control and prevention of coronavirus and; (b) delegate powers to the City and District Councils in accordance with the above regulations. |
|||||||||||||
|
SEND High Needs Funding Cabinet Mem Cabinet
Member: Education & Cultural
Services Forward Plan Ref: 2020/098 Contact: Graham Pirt, Interim Head of SEND Tel: 07554 103332
Report by Deputy Director of Education (CA8). A report on SEND High Needs Funding
recommending approval of a one-off change to the funding formula for top up
payments for secondary schools for the academic year. Additional documents: Minutes:
|