Venue: Rooms 1&2 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Contact: Sue Whitehead Tel: 07393 001213; E-Mail: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Harrod and Councillor Lindsay-Gale. |
|||||||||||
|
Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 28 November 2017 were approved and signed subject to the following amendment: Minute 88/17 – Penultimate paragraph of the preamble amended to read: ‘Councillor David Bartholomew, Cabinet Member for Finance, replied to the comments made and expressed his satisfaction that performance against budget was good. He hoped that would continue and although it was right to ask questions we were over performing and this cautious approach would continue. The risk around Brexit was being considered and would be reported to the Audit & Governance Committee. On ethical investment there was no specific policy. The primary objective was the security of investments that led to investment being with banks, building societies and some external funds.’ |
|||||||||||
|
Questions from County Councillors Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers. The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response. Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time. Minutes: Councillor Phillips had given
notice of the following question to Councillor
Constance: 'The
Oxford Transport Strategy LTP4 proposes on Page 23 'a crossing of the A40 east
of Headington roundabout (linking Barton and Risinghurst)'. This commitment recognises the danger for
pedestrians having to dodge traffic to cross 2 dual carriageways of the A40 at
the bottom of Collinwood Road. There is a primary school in Barton, a post
office and a pub in Risinghurst and thriving faith
groups in both communities. Good reasons for why people cross this road. Can
you let me know when the commitment to install this crossing will be
fulfilled?' Councillor Constance replied: This
scheme remains an aspiration but is currently unfunded. We will seek to
secure funding from future planning applications in the area, or other sources
if appropriate. Whilst it is recognised that this scheme would fulfil an
important local function, it would not deliver wider strategic benefits or help
to deliver significant economic or housing growth, which unfortunately limits
our ability to secure funding for the scheme, since most of our funding for
transport schemes currently comes from competitive growth-related government
funds. Supplementary: In response to
a further question Councillor Constance expressed surprise that there had been
no Section 106 money associated with the existing development and on hearing
that it was judged to be tod far away gave a commitment to to pursue Section 106 funding for future development. In
the meantime Councillor Constance undertook to discuss the matter with officers
to see what if anything could be done to make it safer. Councillor Howson
had given notice of the following question to Councillor Hibbert-Biles: ‘The
viability and longevity of the Oxfordshire Strategic Schools Partnership Board
(OSSPB) will depend on the financial model that can be ensured for the future.
The Board initially secured funding through the generous support of the OCC and
Schools Forum.’ How much funding was provided by Oxfordshire County Council for
2017-18 and will that funding continue into 2018-19? Councillor Hibbert-Biles replied: “The SSPB received £250,610 on the 16th
of March 2016 under the proviso of a one off sum. As the board is not a
legal entity the money was actually transferred to the Vale Academy Trust under
a funding agreement. Our understanding is that the SSPB has sufficient funding
remaining to extend the agreement for up to 2 more years. OCC will continue to provide a clerk for
both the SSPB board and its operational boards through core funding. There is no plan to provide the SSPB with
any further funding from the council’s core budget. Additional monies for
strategic school improvement must be applied for by bidding for the strategic
school improvement fund held by central government. SSPB will need to identify suitable legal
entity organisations to bid for money for strategic school improvement on their
behalf” |
|||||||||||
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes: The Leader of the Council had agreed the following requests to address
the meeting:-
|
|||||||||||
|
2017/18 Financial Monitoring & Business Strategy Delivery Report - October 2017 Cabinet Member: Finance Forward Plan Ref: 2017/081 Contact: Katy Jurczyszyn, Strategic Finance Manger (Finance, Strategy & Monitoring) Tel: 07584 909518 Report by Director of Finance (CA6). The report is the third financial monitoring report for 2017/18 and
focuses on the delivery of the 2017/18 budget based on projections at the end
of October 2017. Parts 1 and 2 include
projections for revenue, reserves and balances. Capital Programme monitoring and update is
included at Part 3. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to: (a)
note
the report; (b)
approve
the virement requests set out in Annex 2a; (c)
note
the Virements set out in Annex 2b; (d)
approve
the bad debt write offs set out in paragraphs 37 to 40; (e)
note
the Treasury Management lending list at Annex 3; (f)
approve
the updated Capital Programme at Annex 7 and the associated changes to the
programme in Annex 6c; (g)
approve
the contractual commitment for construction of the new Secondary School in
South West Bicester, with a total budget of £16.0m; (h)
delegate
to the Director of Finance and Strategic Director for Communities in
consultation with the Leader of the Council to approve the stage 2 Full
Business Case and the award of the construction contract for the new Secondary
School in South West Bicester; (i)
approve the total project budget of £15.8m,
including the release of £4.2m towards the delivery of the slip road at
A34/A4183 junction at Lodge Hill; and (j)
approve an
increase in the capital programme to reflect the budget for the master site
plans for Drayton and Deddington Depots to £4.5m and
delegate authority to the Director of Finance on the funding option to support
the capital investment. Additional documents:
Minutes: Cabinet considered the third financial monitoring report for 2017/18
that focused on the delivery of the 2017/18 budget based on projections at the
end of October 2017. Parts 1 and 2
include projections for revenue, reserves and balances. Capital Programme monitoring and update was
included at Part 3. Councillor Helen Evans, Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance, expressed
concern at the increase in the projected overspend and
in particular at the increased overspend in CEF. She sought assurances that
there would not be further increases. There was a need to look after the most
vulnerable but there was also a need to be able to have confidence in the
forecast and also confidence that the increase was due to increased demand and not
to problems with the system/processes. She queried how the out of county SEND
placements could be reduced and commented on the underspend
in public health. Councillor Evans welcomed the look ahead at
capital spend but noted that it was difficult to see the reasons for
variations. She asked that consideration be given to including further
commentary on variations in future reports. Councillor Bartholomew responded to the points made and agreed that the
CEF overspend was a matter of concern but it was necessary to meet statutory
requirement and to do everything possible to protect vulnerable children. He
added that he was able to say with confidence that there was rising demand. He
clarified that the underspend in public health was not
related to the ring fenced element. Councillor Bartholomew moved the recommendations. RESOLVED: to: (a)
note
the report; (b)
approve
the virement requests set out in Annex 2a; (c)
note
the Virements set out in Annex 2b; (d)
approve
the bad debt write offs set out in paragraphs 37 to 40; (e)
note
the Treasury Management lending list at Annex 3; (f)
approve
the updated Capital Programme at Annex 7 and the associated changes to the
programme in Annex 6c; (g)
approve
the contractual commitment for construction of the new Secondary School in
South West Bicester, with a total budget of £16.0m; (h)
delegate
to the Director of Finance and Strategic Director for Communities in
consultation with the Leader of the Council to approve the stage 2 Full
Business Case and the award of the construction contract for the new Secondary
School in South West Bicester; (i)
approve the total project budget of £15.8m,
including the release of £4.2m towards the delivery of the slip road at
A34/A4183 junction at Lodge Hill; and (j)
approve an
increase in the capital programme to reflect the budget for the master site
plans for Drayton and Deddington Depots to £4.5m and
delegate authority to the Director of Finance on the funding option to support
the capital investment. |
|||||||||||
|
Service & Resource Planning Report - 2018/19 - December 2017 Cabinet Member: Finance Forward Plan Ref: 2017/082 Contact: Katy Jurczyszyn, Strategic Finance Manager (Finance, Strategy & Monitoring) Tel: 07584 909518 Report by Director of Finance (CA7). The report is the second in the series on the Service & Resource
Planning process for 2018/19 which will culminate in Council setting a budget
for 2018/19 and a medium term financial plan to 2021/22 in February 2018. The report sets out the: ·
new
financial strategy principles; ·
new
improvements and investments plus pressures and savings for 2018/19 and the
medium term; ·
key
announcements of the Autumn Budget announced on 22 November 2017; ·
review
of charges for 2018/19; and ·
capital programme portfolios for 2018/19 to
2027/28. Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to take the issues set out in the report into
consideration in forming their proposed budget for 2018/19, Medium Term
Financial Plan to 2021/22 and Capital Programme to 2027/28. Additional documents:
Minutes: Cabinet considered the second in the series on the Service &
Resource Planning process for 2018/19 which will culminate in Council setting a
budget for 2018/19 and a medium term financial plan to 2021/22 in February
2018. The report set out the: ·
new
financial strategy principles; ·
new
improvements and investments plus pressures and savings for 2018/19 and the
medium term; ·
key
announcements of the Autumn Budget announced on 22 November 2017; ·
review
of charges for 2018/19; and ·
capital programme portfolios for 2018/19 to
2027/28. In addition Cabinet had before them an addenda setting out a change to
Section 14 of Annex 2b – Resources – Registration Service – Review of Charges
2018/19. Councillor Evans,
Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance, referred to the continuing difficult
financial situation the Council was in and noted that balancing the budget was
contingent on reducing the numbers needing the County Council’s help. She
queried how realistic this was when the new financial year was only 3 months
away. There were plans in place to reduce demand but these will take time to
take effect. She was concerned that the Council could find itself in the same
position next year but with less reserves having had
to use them in 2018/19. Councillor Evans also referred to the changes in adult
social care and the impact on users. In another year of financial savings the
risks were higher and reserves lower. Councillor
Brighouse, Chairman of Performance Scrutiny Committee thanked Cabinet members
and officers for their attendance at the meeting on 14 December which had been
a very useful session. The Committee had considered the budget in detail and
she highlighted a number of issues raised by it: ·
The
Committee had queried whether a greater sum could come from the Transformation
Programme. The Committee would be discussing this with PwC. ·
There
was concern at the use of reserves. ·
Inflation
increases were also a cause for concern. ·
Income
generation was seen as a key issue by one member. ·
Issues
around the forward plan in relation to forward funding ·
The
potential impact of the move to a unitary authority has not been factored in. In terms of
specific services concerns had been raised in respect of children, education and
families and adult social care. Of particular concern was the position with
regard to home to school transport and special educational need and disability
(SEND) issues. On SEND the Committee had recently received a report
highlighting some of the issues and she queried whether it was an issue that
the County Council needed to be looking to central government for funding. Councillor Brighouse expressed concern at the reliance on the market in the provision of services to the most vulnerable in society and commented that the Council needed a stake in the provision of these services. With regard to keeping children out of care there was concern expressed about the risks of children being taken into care and that there was a need for tangible support for schools who were at ... view the full minutes text for item 98/17 |
|||||||||||
|
Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme 2017 Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2017/130 Contact: Peter Day, Minerals and Waste Policy Team Leader Tel (01865) 815544 Report by Director for Planning & Place (CA8). The County Council must prepare and maintain a Minerals and Waste Development Scheme, setting out the programme for production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan. The original Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme came into effect in May 2005 and a number of revisions have been made since then, most recently in February 2016. Part 1 of the Plan, the Core Strategy was adopted in September 2017 but the prolonged examination of that plan has delayed commencement of work on Part 2 of the Plan - the Site Allocations. The timetable for preparation of the Site Allocations plan in the most recent revison of the Development Scheme is therefore now out of date. A further revision of the Development Scheme is therefore now required. The revised programme for the Site Allocations plan shows work having commenced in September 2017; consultation on site options in June 2018; consultation on a draft plan in January 2019; publication in September and submission for examination in December 2019; and the plan being adopted by the Council by November 2020. The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to (a)
approve
the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme (Eighth Revision) 2017 at
Annex 1, subject to final detailed amendment and editing, to have effect from 8
January 2018; (b)
authorise
the Director for Planning & Place to: (i) carry out any final detailed amendment and editing of the
Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme that may be necessary, in
consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment; (ii) take the necessary steps to bring the revised Scheme into
effect from 8 January 2018 and publish the revised Scheme, in accordance with
Sections 15 and 16 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as
amended). Additional documents: Minutes: The County Council must prepare and maintain a Minerals and Waste Development Scheme, setting out the programme for production of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan. The original Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme came into effect in May 2005 and a number of revisions have been made since then, most recently in February 2016. Part 1 of the Plan, the Core Strategy was adopted in September 2017 but the prolonged examination of that plan has delayed commencement of work on Part 2 of the Plan - the Site Allocations. The timetable for preparation of the Site Allocations plan in the most recent revision of the Development Scheme is therefore now out of date. Cabinet considered a report seeking approval of the revised Development Scheme. Councillor John Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Environment referred to the delays in the development of the Plan and that it was good that Part 1 was now adopted. The delay in producing Part 2 was understandable given the earlier delays with Part 1. He noted the proposed timetable included an additional 4 months to the current timings and hoped that this was now a sound estimate. The report at pages 193-194 detailed milestones and he would wish to see reports to the Minerals & Waste Cabinet Advisory Group (CAG) in order to track progress. Councillor Constance in moving the recommendations thanked Peter Day for his efforts and welcomed the suggestion from Councillor Sanders for regular reports to the Minerals & Waste CAG. Peter Day added that he was happy to bring reports to the CAG at each key stage of the process. In respect of the timetable they would hope to prune it back but it was the best estimate of a realistic timescale based on experience. RESOLVED: (by 6 votes for to 1 against) to: (a)
approve
the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme (Eighth Revision) 2017 at
Annex 1, subject to final detailed amendment and editing, to have effect from 8
January 2018; (b)
authorise
the Director for Planning & Place to: (i) carry out any final detailed amendment and editing of the
Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme that may be necessary, in
consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment; (ii) take the necessary steps to bring the revised Scheme into effect
from 8 January 2018 and publish the revised Scheme, in accordance with Sections
15 and 16 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended). |
|||||||||||
|
Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2017 Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2017/129 Contact: Peter Day, Minerals and Waste Policy Team Leader Tel: (01865) 815544 Report by Director for Planning & Place (CA9). Government planning policy in the NPPF requires the County Council to prepare an annual Local Aggregate Assessment (LAA). The LAA establishes the amount of provision for mineral working that should be made in the Minerals and Waste Local Plan and it can also be a material consideration in the determination of planning applications for mineral working. The current LAA 2014 was approved by the Cabinet in November 2014. It set provision levels for sharp sand and gravel and crushed rock higher than the 10 year sale average. It provides the basis for the levels of provision for mineral supply in policy M2 of the Core Strategy (Part 1 of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan) which was adopted in September 2017. Updated information on sales and reserves of aggregates in Oxfordshire, for 2014, 2015 and 2016, is now available. Following the adoption of the Core Strategy, a revised LAA should now be produced, taking into account this more up to date information. Sales of sharp sand and gravel increased in 2014 and 2015 but fell back in 2016, and there was a further fall in the 10 year sales average. Sales of soft sand and crushed rock increased above the LAA 2014 provision levels. Notwithstanding this new information, it is considered that the approach and methodology used in the LAA 2014 continues to be robust and defensible and that the resultant analysis and conclusions continue to hold; and that the provision levels in the LAA 2014 continue to be appropriate and should be carried forward in the revised LAA 2017. It is considered to be too early in the monitoring period for the Core Strategy to change the LAA provision levels. A revised draft LAA 2017 is put forward on this basis. The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to (a) approve the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate
Assessment 2017 at Annex 1 for use as the basis for provision for mineral
working in the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan and for calculating
the Oxfordshire landbank; (b) authorise the Director for Planning and Place in
consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment to make any necessary minor
corrections and amendments and publish the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate
Assessment 2017 on the Council website. Additional documents: Minutes: Government planning policy in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires the County Council to prepare an annual Local Aggregate Assessment (LAA). The LAA establishes the amount of provision for mineral working that should be made in the Minerals and Waste Local Plan and it can also be a material consideration in the determination of planning applications for mineral working. The current LAA 2014 was approved by the Cabinet in November 2014. Updated information on sales and reserves of aggregates in Oxfordshire, for 2014, 2015 and 2016, is now available. Following the adoption of the Core Strategy, Cabinet considered a report seeking approval of a revised LAA, taking into account this more up to date information. Councillor John Sanders agreed with the conclusions set out at paragraph 6.6 of the draft LAA document and looked forward to the next review as this was an issue that needed to be monitored. RESOLVED: to (a)
approve
the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2017 at Annex 1 for use as the basis
for provision for mineral working in the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Local
Plan and for calculating the Oxfordshire landbank; (b) authorise the Director for Planning and Place in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment to make any necessary minor corrections and amendments and publish the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2017 on the Council website. |
|||||||||||
|
Forward Plan and Future Business Cabinet Member: All Contact Officer: Sue Whitehead, Committee Services
Manager Tel: 07393 001213 The Cabinet Procedure
Rules provide that the business of each
meeting at the Cabinet is to include “updating of the Forward Plan and
proposals for business to be conducted at the following meeting”. Items from the Forward Plan for the
immediately forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet appear in the Schedule at CA10. This includes any updated information
relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified
for inclusion in the next Forward Plan
update. The
Schedule is for noting, but Cabinet Members
may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they
would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update. The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings. Minutes: The Cabinet considered a
list of items for the immediately
forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet together with changes and additions set out
in the schedule of addenda. RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings. |