122/14 |
Questions from County Councillors PDF 95 KB
Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers.
The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response.
Questions
submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the
subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other
councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be
the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the
despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule
of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which
is available at that time.
Minutes:
Councillor Howson had given
notice of the following questions to Councillor Tilley:
“1. In the Resource
briefing last week pressures of over £1 million were identified in the Home to
School budget for this year. Can the Cabinet Member identify where these
pressures have arisen since the budget was agreed in February."
Councillor Tilley replied:
“The pressure in Home to School
Transport was identified through the Financial Monitoring Reports towards the
end of the 2013/14 financial year. At this time the budget setting process had
been substantially completed and it was not clear whether this would be an
on-going pressure or a one off. At the end of 2013/14 there was an overspend of £1.35m and there is expected to be an
on-going pressure in the near future which has now been included as part of the
budget proposals for 2015/16. There are plans in place to deal with the
pressure and also to make savings over the coming years which should result in
a reduction in the budget over the medium term.
Analysis of the home to school
budget across financial years 2011/12 to 2013/14 found that expenditure has
been steadily rising over this period. In total, expenditure rose by £1.9m
(14%) between 11/12 and 13/14 (N.B some areas of expenditure were excluded from
the analysis – circa £600K).
The majority of this (£1.4m) is
attributable to increased spend on four-seater taxis,
which rose by 42% over the three years. £760,497 of this increase is
attributable to SEN transport, £346,342 to mainstream transport, £158,745 to
Meadowbrook transport (pupil referral units), and the remainder to others.
Spend on 5-seater wheel chair accessible vehicles also increased substantially
over this period – by £296,466 (42%).
Oxford City saw the highest
increase in spend, at £849K (28%). This reflects the high concentration of
Special Schools in the city, many of which cater to students from all over the
county, and a temporary lack of primary school places which meant students had
to travel further distances to get to school.
As a result of these findings, efforts are now focused on
reducing spend in the categories / areas identified above. A programme of route
assessment and rationalisation has already begun and has delivered substantial
savings in 14/15, particularly to mainstream transport. From January onwards, work
will focus largely on SEN transport and reducing usage of taxis through a
combination of initiatives, including independent travel training, personal
budgets and merging of multiple taxi routes into lower cost minibus routes.”
“2. What has been the spend on taxis in the first six months
of the current financial year compared with the same period last year on:
a] taxi for SEN pupils
b] taxis for pupils other than SEN
pupils.”
Councillor Tilley replied:
“The below two tables show expenditure for SEN and mainstream students
on vehicles which could be classed as ‘taxis’, compared between the first six
months of 2014/15 and the same period in 2013/14.
SEN Expenditure
|
Vehicle type
|
2013/14 (Apr - Sep)
|
2014/15 ... view the full minutes text for item 122/14
|
123/14 |
Petitions and Public Address PDF 75 KB
Minutes:
The following requests to address
the meeting had been agreed:
Item 6 – Roger Bush, Anthea Taylor and Dr Jim Halliday
Andy Cattermole, Taylor Wimpey
Councillor Lovatt, Councillor
Fawcett, Councillor Constance
Item 7 – Councillor Hards
Item 8 – Councillor Hards
Anthony Simpson, CAG project
Dan Betterton, CAG project
Item 9 – Councillor Susanna
Pressel
Item 10 –Councillor Gill Sanders
Councillor Liz Brighouse
Item 11 – Councillor Gill Sanders
Councillor Susanna Pressel,
speaking as a local councillor welcomed the consultation response and the
success of the Oxford and Abingdon Flood Alleviation Schemes. However she was
disappointed at the number of typographical errors in the report. Referring to
the consultation she queried how the Council had met with and reached out to
areas where there were no parish councils. She expressed concern at the level
of officer participation on the Oxford Area Flood Partnership and felt that the
detail on riparian land ownership was unclear. The information on future
arrangements around SUDs from government was unclear and she asked that the
Council urge government to make progress.
Responding members expressed
satisfaction at the level of consultation with Parish Councils and noted that
all communities could apply for parish status.
Petition
Cllr. Samantha Bowring, Town Councillor for Ock Meadow Ward submitted a petition requesting Cabinet to
keep the Marcham Road crossing at its current site, as the safest and most
convenient crossing point for pedestrians.
|
124/14 |
Follow up to the Call in of a Decision by the Cabinet Member for Environment: Proposed Pelican Crossings - A415 Marcham Road and Ock Street, Abingdon PDF 147 KB
The report before cabinet asks
Members to consider the proposal in the round and specifically responds to the
challenges from Scrutiny Committee.
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a)
approve implementation of proposals for two
proposed Pelican crossings on A415 Marcham Road and Ock
Street, Abingdon as advertised and
(b)
(if approved) ask officers to monitor
closely the safety performance and traffic delays following the completion of
the works.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
At their meeting
on 3 November 2014 the Performance Scrutiny Committee considered the decision
of the Cabinet Member of Environment made on 9 October 2014 following proper
notice of call in. The Committee agreed to refer the decision back to Cabinet
for it to consider in the light of the following aspects of the decision:
(a) That neither the Officers report nor the
Cabinet Members decision appeared to be based on the Department for Transport
Guidance into the assessment of pedestrian crossing sites and;
(b) The Cabinet Member did not take due
account of the impact of the changes on the wider local traffic network.
Cabinet had before them a report
that asked Members to consider all previous papers for the proposal as well as the
current report and specifically to respond to the challenges from Scrutiny
Committee. Cabinet also had before them the petition submitted by Councillor. Samantha Bowring,
Town Councillor for Ock Meadow Ward.
Roger Bush, speaking against the decision of the Cabinet
Member for Environment made on 9 October 2014 explained the context of the
decision within the planning framework and the current position with regard to
planning applications. He commented that with the National Planning Policy
Framework local control had been lost. He stated that he saw no sense in the
decision on road safety or traffic grounds. He refuted that there would be no
impact and believed that there would be adverse traffic consequences with
lengthened queues. Mr Bush questioned the competence and integrity of officers,
which statements were strongly refuted by Cabinet who noted that they were hard
working, professional and experienced individuals.
Anthea Turner,
queried the purpose of the changes when the Town Council and residents did not
want them and in her view they were not designed to improve traffic. The County
Council was afraid of being sued but it was clear that if the measures proved
impossible to proceed then the development cannot continue. She expressed doubt
over the modelling that had taken place and asserted that the changes would
cause massive hold ups on Drayton Road.
Dr Jim Halliday, spoke against the
proposals highlighting congestion and queues leading to air quality issues.
Andy Cattermole, Taylor Wimpey, spoke in support of the
report from officers and asked that Cabinet follow its recommendations.
Councillor Constance, speaking as a a
signatory to the call in expressed concern over increased congestion and argued
that the Highways Authority had not exercised its powers to examine the wider
congestion that she felt would be the result of the changes.
Councillor Neil Fawcett, speaking as a local councillor and
as the originator of the call in stated that the views expressed reflected that
the process followed was not trusted and was seen to be led by the planning
decision rather than being arrived at objectively. He supported comments from
Councillor Constance around congestion in the wider area. Referring to an
assessment of safety he considered that the County Council had not done a
proper assessment of ... view the full minutes text for item 124/14
|
125/14 |
2014/15 Financial Monitoring & Business Strategy Delivery Report - October 2014 PDF 207 KB
Cabinet Member: Finance
Forward Plan Ref: 2014/105
Contact: Kathy Wilcox, Chief Accountant Tel: (01865) 323981
Report by Chief Finance Officer (CA7).
The report focuses on the delivery of the Directorate Business Strategies
that were agreed as part of the Service and Resource Planning Process for
2014/15 – 2017/18. Parts 1 and 2 include
projections for revenue, reserves and balances as at the end of October 2014. Capital Programme monitoring is included at
Part 3.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a)
note
the report and annexes including the Treasury Management lending list at Annex
4 and changes set out in paragraphs 67 - 68;
(b)
recommend
Council to approve the virement to reduce the in -
year income and contribution to the Parking Account included in Annex 2a and
paragraph 56;
(c)
approve
the virement request relating to the Shared Lives
budget set out in Annex 2a and paragraph 57;
(d)
approve
the write off of rental income totalling £16,453 and £15,212 relating to a
Section 106 agreement as set out in paragraphs 65 and 66.
(e)
approve
the changes to the Capital Programme set out in Annex 7c;
(f)
approve
the removal of the capital scheme at Bicester Market Square from the capital
programme as set out in paragraph 96; and
(g)
approve
the allocation of £1.250m S106 funding as a contribution towards the
construction of the A40/Downs Road Junction by the West Witney developer
(paragraph 97).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet considered a report that focussed on the delivery of the
Directorate Business Strategies that were agreed as part of the Service and
Resource Planning Process for 2014/15 – 2017/18. Parts 1 and 2 included projections for
revenue, reserves and balances as at the end of October 2014. Capital Programme monitoring was included at
Part 3.
Councillor Hards, Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance, noted the difficult
position that faced Councillor Stratford and highlighted 3 areas in particular.
Firstly the shortfall in the Environment & Economy parking income which
meant that expected work would not now happen. Secondly he raised the whole
area of adult social care. The Council could not afford to get this wrong. He
drew particular attention to learning disabilities and the impact of personal
budgets. Finally children’s social care was a huge challenge. He queried
whether by giving more help to parents who are struggling it would be possible
to keep children out of care, which would be cheaper and better for the child.
Councillor Tilley, Cabinet Member for Children, Education &
Families, gave an assurance that a lot of work was done to keep children with
families.
Councillor Stratford, Cabinet Member for Finance, introduced the report,
highlighted the continuing pressures on children’s social care and learning
disabilities and the actions being taken as a result. He noted that the figures
did not include the money released at the full Council meeting on 9 December.
During discussion Cabinet recognised the efforts being made in adult
social care to ensure that statutory and eligibility criteria were met.
Councillor Hudspeth, Leader of the Council commented that it was about
protecting vulnerable people. Cabinet noted that the additional pressures on
adult social care had an impact on other aspects of the Council such as the
increased numbers of calls to customer services.
RESOLVED:
to:
(a)
note the
report and annexes including the Treasury Management lending list at Annex 4
and changes set out in paragraphs 67 - 68;
(b)
recommend
Council to approve the virement to reduce the in - year income and contribution
to the Parking Account included in Annex 2a and paragraph 56;
(c)
approve
the virement request relating to the Shared Lives budget set out in Annex 2a
and paragraph 57;
(d)
approve the write
off of rental income totalling £16,453 and £15,212 relating to a Section 106
agreement as set out in paragraphs 65 and 66.
(e)
approve
the changes to the Capital Programme set out in Annex 7c;
(f)
approve
the removal of the capital scheme at Bicester Market Square from the capital
programme as set out in paragraph 96; and
(g)
approve the
allocation of £1.250m S106 funding as a contribution towards the construction
of the A40/Downs Road Junction by the West Witney developer (paragraph 97).
|
126/14 |
Service & Resource Planning Report 2015/16 - December 2014 PDF 137 KB
Cabinet Member: Finance
Forward Plan Ref: 2014/106
Contact: Stephanie Skivington, Corporate Finance Manager Tel:
(01865) 323995
Report by Chief Finance Officer (CA8).
This report is the second in a
series on the Service & Resource Planning process for 2015/16, providing
councillors with information on budget issues for 2015/16 and the medium
term. The report sets out draft budget
proposals to meet emerging pressures; provides an update on government
consultations and sets out the review of charges.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) note
the report and addenda (that will be produced following the announcement of the
Chancellor’s Autumn Statement);
(b) consider
the pressures and savings set out in Annex 1 in forming its budget proposals in
January 2015; and
(c) in
relation to the review of charges:
(1)
note those charges prescribed by
legislation;
(2)
approve the
charges where there is local discretion as set out in Annex 2.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet considered the second
report in a series on the Service & Resource Planning process for 2015/16, that provided councillors with information on budget
issues for 2015/16 and the medium term. The report set out draft budget
proposals to meet emerging pressures; provided an update on government
consultations and set out the review of charges.
Anthony Simpson, spoke in support of Community Action
Groups CAGs, on behalf of the Sustainable Didcot CAG, as the co-founder of the Kidlington vs climate change CAG, and as someone who works for
community energy social enterprise Low Carbon Hub (in partnership with both the county
council, and the CAG team). He emphasised the role played by the modest but
critical funding in getting projects such as his established.
Dan Betterton, Cultivate CAG
project, spoke in support of the CAG funding stating that Groups such as his
would have got started without it. It enabled them to lever funds from other
sources. If the funding was to be removed then he asked that it be tapered to
allow time and space to address the loss.
Councillor Hards, Shadow Cabinet
Member for Finance, highlighted the use of contingency funding, and commented
that the pressures on children, education & families and adult social care
were not abating. He queried whether if there was good news on the level of
Council tax increase allowed before a referendum was required, the Council would
take advantage of it to reduce pressures. He raised a number of detailed queries
including the position on the £8m funding for adult social care, how robust
were the savings figures for vacancies and use of agency staff and who would
monitor. He indicated that he would like more information on the cuts in CEF
and to see the detailed figures underpinning it. He expressed some concern
about the depletion of the reserve pots. He referred to the funding for roads
but noted that it was not guaranteed and even if received would be
insufficient. He noted the increase in council tax base which was a welcome
effect of the building boom.
The Leader and Cabinet Member for
Finance responded to the points made. The Leader suggested that if the
referendum was raised then it might be possible to increase reserves. Councillor
Stratford, Cabinet Member for Finance noted that the budget would be a
challenge with hard decisions to be made.
During discussion Councillor
Heathcoat commented that the £8m referred to by Councillor Hards was not new
money. She had been very robust on the need for the money and would advise
people once she had news.
Lorna Baxter, Chief Finance
Officer, introduced the contents of the report and referred to the
supplementary report following the Chancellor’s Autumn
statement.
RESOLVED:
to:
(a)
note the report and addenda (produced following
the announcement of the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement);
(b)
consider the pressures and savings set out in
Annex 1 in forming its budget proposals in January 2015; and
(c)
in relation to the review of charges: ... view the full minutes text for item 126/14
|
127/14 |
Child Sexual Exploitation Update - OSCB Report and Report on CSE PDF 173 KB
Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families
Forward Plan Ref: 2014/181
Contact: Hannah Farncombe, Safeguarding Manager Tel: (01865) 815273
Report by Director for Children’s
Services (CA10).
The Cabinet is asked to consider the report and to:
(a)
consider
whether they are satisfied with the work that has been undertaken in relation
to combatting CSE; and
(b)
support
the recommendation for briefings to be provided for elected members to enable
them to better recognise and respond to concerns about grooming and
exploitation.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet received
a report on Actions in Response to Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) in November
2012, following the successful prosecutions under Operation Bullfinch. That
report set out key information about the nature of child sexual exploitation
and progress in tackling the issue.
Work on CSE is led on a multi-agency
partnership basis through the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Board Child and
the Sexual Exploitation Sub-Group which provides leadership and challenge to
ensure the CSE Strategy and Action Plan is being delivered.
Cabinet had before them a report to update members on progress on
tackling CSE and to provide assurance on how we are responding to this issue.
Also attached was the annual report of the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Board which
sets out progress on the key areas of the action plan.
Councillor Brighouse, Chairman of the Performance Scrutiny Committee commented
that she read the report with interest and had also read the jay Report. It brought
home to her quite powerfully the role of Scrutiny in picking up issues of CSE.
Referring to missing children she had a concern as to how to disaggregate those
of real concern from the numbers of teenagers who go missing as part of the normal
pattern of teenage rebellion. The focus had to be on SMART indicators picking
up quickly where there was a need to drill down. As Chairman of the Performance
Scrutiny Committee she emphasised that they were working on it and would
welcome any ideas on good indicators.
The Leader responding to the comments made stated that the issues raised
were everyone’s concern, not just the Council but communities.
Councillor Gill Sanders, Cabinet Member for Children, Education &
Families welcomed the report, drawing out the increased activity and the
increase in social workers employed by the Council. She also highlighted the
partnership working. She was concerned that if the Council did not get
additional funding then the increased costs could have a severe impact on the
Council’s finances.
Councillor Tilley stated that in relation to missing children all
returning children had a return interview. The whole system had changed as a
result of lessons learnt.
Jim Leivers, Director for Children’s Services introduced the contents of
the report.
RESOLVED:
to:
(a)
note
and express satisfaction with the work that has been undertaken in relation to
combatting CSE; and
(b)
support the
recommendation for briefings to be provided for elected members to enable them
to better recognise and respond to concerns about grooming and exploitation.
|
128/14 |
Strategy for Special Educational Needs Infrastructure to 2030 PDF 359 KB
Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families
Forward Plan Ref: 2014/155
Contact: Janet Johnson, Children with SEN Manager Tel: (01865)
815129
Report by Director for Children’s
Services (CA11).
The report sets out a proposed
strategy to meet the rising demand for specialist provision for children and
young people with special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities, aged 2
to 25 years, in the short term and until 2030. In parallel to the development
of new primary schools and secondary schools, the Council has a duty to ensure
sufficient provision for children with special educational needs. This strategy
promotes a locality approach, ensuring that each local area has a range of
specialist provision.
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note
and endorse the Council’s proposed strategy for meeting the demand for
specialist provision for children and young people with SEN and Disabilities,
aged 2 to 25 years, in the short term and until 2030.
Minutes:
Cabinet considered a report
setting out a proposed strategy to meet the rising demand for specialist
provision for children and young people with special educational needs (SEN)
and/or disabilities, aged 2 to 25 years, in the short term and until 2030.
Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow
Cabinet Member for Children, Education & Families noted that the number of
children needing help had increased and that the aspirations and key risks were
set out in the report. She was concerned that one key risk was insufficient
funding and that once again the Council was facing a situation where lots of
money was needed to support increased demand.
RESOLVED:
to note and endorse the Council’s proposed strategy for meeting the demand for specialist
provision for children and young people with SEN and Disabilities, aged 2 to 25
years, in the short term and until 2030.
|
129/14 |
Flood Risk Management Consultation Responses PDF 90 KB
Cabinet Member: Deputy Leader
Forward Plan Ref: 2014/107
Contact: Steve Smith, Service Manager – Network & Asset
Management Tel: (01865) 810435
Report by Director for
Environment & Economy (CA9).
The report presents the outcomes of
the consultation into the County Councils draft Local Flood Risk Management
Strategy and proposed amendments arising from feedback received.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to
(a)
note the feedback from the consultation
contained in the consultation Annex 1 and the background document
(b)
approve the changes to the Strategy Action
Plan identified in Annex 2; and
(c)
adopt the
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy with revisions to the action plan.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet considered a report
presenting the outcomes of the consultation into the County Councils draft
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy and proposed amendments arising from
feedback received.
Councillor Rose, responded to the
points raised by Councillor Pressel (minute 123/14 refers) noting that document
was a work in progress and the final document would be have typographical
errors corrected. In areas where there were no parish councils
alternatives had been found. The officer representing the Council on the Oxford
Area Flood Partnership was recognised as a national expert on urban drainage.
RESOLVED: to:
(a)
note the feedback from the consultation
contained in the consultation Annex 1 and the background document
(b)
approve the changes to the Strategy Action Plan
identified in Annex 2; and
(c)
adopt the Local Flood Risk
Management Strategy with revisions to the action plan.
|
130/14 |
Forward Plan and Future Business PDF 102 KB
Cabinet Member: All
Contact Officer: Sue Whitehead, Committee Services
Manager (01865 810262)
The Cabinet Procedure
Rules provide that the business of each
meeting at the Cabinet is to include “updating of the Forward Plan and proposals
for business to be conducted at the following meeting”. Items from the Forward Plan for the
immediately forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet appear in the Schedule at CA12. This includes any updated information
relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified
for inclusion in the next Forward Plan
update.
The
Schedule is for noting, but Cabinet Members
may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they
would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Cabinet considered a
list of items for the immediately
forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet together with changes and additions set out
in the schedule of addenda.
RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings.
|
|