Venue: County Hall, Oxford, OX1 1ND
Contact: Sue Whitehead Tel: (01865) 810262; E-Mail: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: An apology for absence was received on behalf of Councillor Nick Carter. |
|
|
Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 15 October 2013 were approved and signed. Councillor Hudspeth referred to the Talking Oxfordshire public meetings that had been well attended. There had also been over 400 responses on the web site. He thanked the Chief Executive who had attended every event. He commented that during the meetings it had been made very clear that no decisions had yet been taken over Children’s Centres. He added that discussions had been wide ranging covering not only Children’s Centres but adult social care, and rural transport amongst others. |
|
|
Questions from County Councillors Any
county councillor may, by giving notice to the Proper Officer by 9 am two working
days before the meeting, ask a question on any matter in respect of the
Cabinet’s delegated powers. The
number of questions which may be asked by any councillor at any one meeting is
limited to two (or one question with notice and a supplementary question at the
meeting) and the time for questions will be limited to 30 minutes in total. As
with questions at Council, any questions which remain unanswered at the end of
this item will receive a written response. Questions submitted prior to the agenda being despatched are shown below and will be the subject of a response from the appropriate Cabinet Member or such other councillor or officer as is determined by the Cabinet Member, and shall not be the subject of further debate at this meeting. Questions received after the despatch of the agenda, but before the deadline, will be shown on the Schedule of Addenda circulated at the meeting, together with any written response which is available at that time. Minutes: Councillor John Howson had given written notice of the
following 2 questions to Councillor Nimmo Smith: 1.
“Is there any S106 moneys available to provide cycle racks
outside Belsyre Court on the Woodstock Road just
north of the new Radcliffe Observatory Quarter?” Councillor Nimmo
Smith replied: ”We currently hold a £7,782 from a S106 which could be used to install
bike racks in the location. I would be more than happy for Councillor
Howson to discuss his ideas with officers”. 2.
“Would you consider the painting of a white line along the
middle of the Marston Ferry Road cycle track, either all the way or just
at each end to help with separating cyclists travelling in opposite directions
at times of peak flows?” Councillor
Nimmo Smith replied: “The Marston Ferry Road cycle track is for the most part very wide and
has worked well for many years now – largely without segregation. Where
it narrows at the Cherwell School end, there are some central segregation
markings along with cycle symbols. I’d be happy for you to talk to
officers about your specific concerns about how the cycle track is working who
could then make an assessment of the need for better or more segregation.” Councillor Jean Fooks had given written notice of the
following question to Councillor Nimmo Smith “I asked at the last Cabinet for information on how much
money is held by the County Council as S106 contributions to ‘cycling measures’
and how will its spending be decided?’. I have not yet had a reply. Please
could you let me have this information as soon as possible?” Councillor
Nimmo Smith replied: “The County Council currently
holds a total of £633,000 of developer funding specifically for investment in
‘cycling measures’. In areas where there is an agreed
transport strategy in place funding is secured and then allocated on the basis
of schemes identified within that strategy. Schemes are then designed and
delivered using the County Council’s capital programme process. This
approach is followed for funding secured for Oxford, Banbury, Bicester, Science
Vale, Witney and Carterton. Where developer funding is held
for locations outside areas with agreed transport strategies, the Member
locality meetings will be used to help identify potential schemes for the
funding to be allocated.” Supplementary: Councillor Fooks
asked when it would be known what the funding was to be spent on as it would be
helpful to have the details. Councillor Nimmo Smith
replied that the locality meetings would determine. Responding to further
comments Councillor Hudspeth indicated that he was scheduled to be at
Councillor Fook’s next locality meeting. Councillor Roz Smith had given written notice of the
following question to Councillor Fatemian "What has been the financial cost to the council, (so far
this year), of the external fund manager, Investec’s
failure to reach their benchmark return?" Councillor
Fatemian replied: “In line with relevant guidance and as outlined in the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy for 2013/14 the primary objective in relation to investments is the security ... view the full minutes text for item 123/13 |
|
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes: The following requests to address the meeting had been agreed: Item 6 – Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Children, Education & Families Item 7 – Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Children, Education & Families Item 8 – Councillor Nick Hards, Shadow Cabinet member for Finance Mr John Taylor, Chairman of PAGE Councillor John Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Environment Councillor Anne Purse, Deputy Chairman of the Waste and Minerals Advisory Group, at the invitation of the Chairman Item 12 – Councillor John Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Environment Item 15 – Councillor John Sanders. Shadow Cabinet Member for Environment |
|
|
Action in Response to Child Sexual Exploitation in Oxfordshire Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families Forward Plan Ref: 2013/150 Contact: Jim Leivers, Director for Children’s Services Tel: (01865) 815122 Report by Director for Children’s Services (CA6). Child sexual exploitation is among the most serious and challenging issue that Oxfordshire County Council has faced. This report sets out the council's learning and actions in response. The Cabinet is asked to: (a)
Endorse the
progress and actions to date and identify any further measures for
consideration. (b)
Receive further
reports from the Cabinet Advisory Group
on Safeguarding Assurance and in relation to the Serious Case Review Minutes: Child sexual exploitation is among the most serious and challenging issue that Oxfordshire County Council has faced. Cabinet had before them a report that set out the council's learning and actions in response. Councillor Gill Sanders, Shadow Cabinet Member for Children, Education & Families welcomed the report and the actions it outlined. She highlighted that it was important that the report recognised the girls were victims and had not made life choices. This was an essential change. She also welcomed the screening tool. The training referred to should be on-going so that it was not possible to forget the lessons learned. She felt it was important to accept accountability. Councillor Sanders further welcomed the new residential home in Oxfordshire and supported the need for more foster parents. Councillor Tilley in moving the recommendations advised that Councillors would be kept fully informed and referred to the role of the Cabinet Advisory Group. Councillor Hudspeth, Leader of the Council,
thanked the Labour and Liberal Democrat Groups for
the cross party support in working together for the best for the children of
Oxfordshire during a very testing time. Jim Leivers, Director for Children’s Services
introduced the contents of the report highlighting key themes and actions going
forward. Councillor Hudspeth thanked the Directorate
staff noting the toll dealing with this sensitive issue was taking. He paid tribute
to his predecessor as the County did not ignore the issue and had ensured that
the necessary finance was there. He referred to a speech he had given at a
Conference on the experience of Oxfordshire with the intention of ensuring not
happening elsewhere. The Council’s commitment was to ensure that safeguarding
and protection was one of our fundamental beliefs. Councillor Rose added that he had seen the
Conference speech and that it was an example that no-one was trying to avoid
the issues and he thanked the Leader, Chief Executive and Director for
Children’s Services for their approach. RESOLVED: to: (a)
Endorse the progress and
actions to date and identify any further measures for consideration. (b)
Receive further
reports from the Cabinet Advisory Group on Safeguarding Assurance and in
relation to the Serious Case Review |
|
|
Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families Forward Plan Ref: 2013/135 Contact: John Dixon, Interim Deputy Director - Children’s Social Care Report by Director for Children’s Services (CA7). This report
recommends that Oxfordshire County Council develops a Multi-Agency Safeguarding
Hub (MASH) in conjunction with partner agencies. A Multi-agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) is a multi-agency unit which pools intelligence about safeguarding referrals, securely, and provides safe and speedy triage as a basis for appropriate ongoing action. As such it is a gateway between universal services (such as Schools and GPs) and specialist and intensive services. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to
endorse the development of a MASH for Oxfordshire. Minutes: Cabinet considered a report seeking endorsement to the development of a
Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) in conjunction with partner agencies. A Multi-agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) is a multi-agency unit which
pools intelligence about safeguarding referrals, securely, and provides safe
and speedy triage as a basis for appropriate on-going action. As such it is a
gateway between universal services (such as Schools and GPs) and specialist and
intensive services. Councillor Gill Sanders Shadow Cabinet Member
for Children, Education & Families spoke in support of the multi-agency
safeguarding hub. It was sensible to bring agencies together and would also
provide financial savings. However she would be concerned if the savings
undermined the safeguarding efforts. She queried whether one single point of
access would be sufficient and that location would be vital. She highlighted
the role and importance of District Councils and queried how they featured in
the Steering Group and decision making. Councillor Tilley in moving the recommendations
replied that they did not have all the answers as yet but gave assurances that
it was not about making savings. Other Councils had done it and the County
Council had learnt from them. Lucy Butler added that there would not be one
single point of access. The Steering Group was set up with other agencies and
she recognised the importance of other agencies
including District Councils who were vital particularly in respect of housing
matters. Councillor Tilley also highlighted the important role of schools. During discussion Councillor Heathcoat, Cabinet
Member for Adult Social Care, welcomed the approach which was one which adult
social care could benefit from. RESOLVED: to endorse the development of a Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) for Oxfordshire. |
|
|
Treasury Management Mid-Term Review (2012/13) Cabinet Member: Finance Forward Plan Ref: 2013/097 Contact: Grey Ley, Financial Manager – Pension Fund Investments Tel: (01865) 323978 Report by Assistant Chief Executive & Chief Finance Officer (CA8). The report sets out the Treasury Management activity undertaken in the first half of the financial year 2013/14 in compliance with the CIPFA Code of Practice. The report includes Debt and Investment activity, Prudential Indicator monitoring, changes in Strategy, and forecast interest receivable and payable for the financial year. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the report, and to RECOMMEND Council
to note the Council’s Mid-Term Treasury Management Review 2013/14. Minutes: Cabinet had before them a report setting out the Treasury Management activity undertaken in the first half of the financial year 2013/14 in compliance with the CIPFA Code of Practice. The report included Debt and Investment activity, Prudential Indicator monitoring, changes in Strategy, and forecast interest receivable and payable for the financial year. Cabinet were
advised that the Audit & Governance Committee considered the report on Wednesday
20 November and had noted with concern Investec’s performance and that
Investec’s annualised return for the first six months of the year was 0.00%
compared with a benchmark of 1.59%, and they recommended that the
Performance Scrutiny Committee consider the matter further and that Cabinet
note the concerns in relation to Investec’s performance as noted in paragraph
29 in the Council’s Mid-Term Treasury Management Review 2013/14. Councillor Nick Hards, Shadow Cabinet Member for
Finance raised 3 points: on annex 4 he queried how helpful the indicators were
and whether better indicators were needed; he sought assurances that the LOBO
loans were being carefully monitored and on annex 1 referred to the relaxed
maturity limit for J. P. Morgan and asked if this was being reconsidered in the
light of recent news. Councillor Fatemian thanked Councillor Hards for
his comments and agreed that it would be useful to explore a more helpful
index, gave an assurance that the loans referred to were kept under scrutiny
and that he would look again at the criteria in relation to J. P. Morgan. Councillor Fatemian in introducing the contents
of the report and addenda highlighted that the level of debt had decreased
(paragraph 15) and thanked the Treasury Management Team for their excellent
work which had seen them exceed their benchmark (paragraph 27). He noted the
concern in relation to Investec as highlighted by the Audit & Governance
Committee and that they had asked Performance Scrutiny Committee to look at it. RESOLVED: Cabinet noted the report and the concern and action proposed by the Audit & Governance Committee and RECOMMENDED Council to note the Council’s Mid-Term Treasury Management Review 2013/14. |
|
|
Final Decision on Expansion of Queensway Primary School to 2 Forms of Entry (2fe) Cabinet Member: Children, Education & Families Forward Plan Ref: 2013/116 Contact: Diane Cameron, School Organisation Officer Tel: (01865) 816445 Report by Director for Children’s Services (CA9). The proposal is to increase the
formal published admission number from 30 to 60 children at Queensway Primary
School in Banbury, on a permanent basis from September 2014. This will
eventually increase the school’s total capacity from its current 277 places in
Years R - Y6 to a maximum of 420. Additional
classroom and supporting spaces will need to be created at the school to
accommodate a permanent increase in pupil numbers, although as the school was
originally built to be 2 form entry this is not
necessarily required to immediately be new build. The school has worked with the
county council in admitting 60 pupils per year for the last two years as
"bulge" classes, accommodating the additional children in existing
permanent spaces with minimal internal remodelling required. The expectation is
that more of the school's space can be brought back in to use as classrooms for
at least another year. In the longer
term new build may be required and will be the subject of an option appraisal,
which would examine the whole site for options and would go through the
planning permission process in the usual way. A final decision on the permanent expansion of the school is now sought. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to approve the permanent expansion of
Queensway Primary School with effect from 1 September 2014. Additional documents:
Minutes: Cabinet
considered a proposed increase to the published admission number from 30 to 60
children at Queensway Primary School in Banbury, on a permanent basis from
September 2014. This will eventually increase the school’s total capacity from
its current 277 places in Years Reception – Year 6 to a maximum of 420. Councillor Tilley
noted that in future reports such as this would be considered in her delegated
decision session so that this was likely to be the last such report to Cabinet,
with the exception of proposals that received significant levels of objection. Note: As set out under Rule 18(a) of the Scrutiny Procedure
Rules, this decision is exempt from Call-In as it is deemed urgent and any
delay would seriously prejudice the Council’s interests, in that the Cabinet’s
role would be negated by referral to the Schools’ Adjudicator if the decisions
were not taken within two months of the end of the Statutory Notices, in this
case being 10 December
2013. RESOLVED: to: (a) approve the permanent expansion of Queensway Primary School with effect from 1 September 2014; and (b) to note that future proposal of this nature would be considered by the Cabinet Member for Children, Education & Families unless there were significant levels of objection. |
|
|
Staffing Report - Quarter 2 - 2013 Cabinet Member: Deputy Leader Forward Plan Ref: 2013/095 Contact: Sue Corrigan, Strategic HR Manager Tel: (01865) 810280 Report by Head of Human Resources (CA10). This report gives an update on staffing numbers and related activity during the period 1 July 2013 to 30 September 2013. It gives details of the agreed staffing numbers and establishment at 30 September 2013 in terms of Full Time Equivalents. These are also shown by directorate in Appendix 1. In addition, the report provides information on vacancies and the cost of posts being covered by agency staff. Appendix 2 shows a breakdown by service area of agency spend. The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to: (a)
note the report; (b) confirm that the Staffing Report meets the
Cabinet’s requirements in reporting and managing staffing numbers. Additional documents:
Minutes: Cabinet
considered a report that gaves an update on staffing
numbers and related activity during the period 1 July 2013 to 30 September
2013. It gave details of the agreed staffing numbers and establishment at 30
September 2013 in terms of Full Time Equivalents. In addition, the report
provided information on vacancies and the cost of posts being covered by agency
staff. RESOLVED:
to: (a) note the report; and (b) confirm that the Staffing Report meets the Cabinet’s requirements in reporting and managing staffing numbers. |
|
|
Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2013 Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2013/131 Contact: Peter Day, Minerals & Waste Policy Team Leader Tel: (01865) 815544 Report by Deputy Director for Environment & Economy – Strategy & Infrastructure Planning (CA10 ). The County Council has a statutory duty to prepare a new Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Plan, to provide an effective planning strategy and policies for the supply of minerals and management of waste in the county, consistent with environmental, social and economic needs. The programme for preparing the plan is the subject of a separate report to this meeting. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to (a)
approve
the 10 year average sales figures set out in the table in paragraph 19 of the
report as the provision figures in the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment
2013, for use as the basis for provision for mineral working in the
consultation draft Minerals and Waste Local Plan and for calculating the
Oxfordshire landbank; (b) authorise the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Strategy & Infrastructure Planning) in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment to finalise the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2013 for publication. Minutes: The County Council has a statutory duty to prepare a new Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Plan, to provide an effective planning strategy and policies for the supply of minerals and management of waste in the county, consistent with environmental, social and economic needs. Under the Government’s National Planning Policy Framework, March 2012 (NPPF), the County Council must prepare a Local Aggregate Assessment Annually. In addition, the duty to co-operate introduced by the Localism Act 2011 applies to the preparation of a local aggregate assessment since this is an activity supporting the preparation of a local plan relating to a strategic matter. Cabinet considered a report that recommended a Local Aggregate Assessment for Oxfordshire for 2013. Councillor Purse expressed her gratitude that
the concerns of the group had been heard and the rolling average had been
restored. Mr Taylor, Chairman of
PAGE, endorsed the 10 year
average sales method which he stated was in line with guidance and in use elsewhere.
Over an 18 year period he felt that this would give a significant decrease
saving Oxfordshire’s lovely countryside. He asked that the 2013 sales figure be
published as soon as possible as part of the planning process. He looked
forward to being consulted. Councillor Nimmo Smith in
moving the recommendations noted that Oxfordshire was a growth county and as
such any figure would need to be regularly reviewed. Martin Tugwell responded to questions
about the use of recycled aggregate and sea dredged aggregate noting that much
of the recycled agregate was used on site so it was
difficult to gauge. The County was not in the best position to make use of sea
dredged aggregate and although a framework was a possibility its use would
remain a commercial decision. The future use of china clay was also governed by
commercial considerations. During discussion Councillor Lindsay Gale stated that
9 parishes affected were in her Division and having been involved previously
she was pleased with the outcome and paid tribute to the work of the Cabinet
Advisory Group. RESOLVED: to (a)
approve
the 10 year average sales figures set out in the table in paragraph 19 of the
report as the provision figures in the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment
2013, for use as the basis for provision for mineral working in the
consultation draft Minerals and Waste Local Plan and for calculating the
Oxfordshire landbank; (b) authorise the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Strategy & Infrastructure Planning) in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment to finalise the Oxfordshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2013 for publication. |
|
|
Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme 2013 Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2013/130 Contact: Peter Day, Minerals & Waste Policy Team Leader Tel: (01865) 815544 Report by Deputy Director for Environment & Economy – Strategy & Infrastructure Planning (CA11). The County Council is preparing a new Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan. The Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme sets out the programme for the production of this plan and the planning policy documents (local development documents) that will make up the plan. Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to (a)
approve
the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme (Fifth Revision) 2013 at
Annex 1, subject to final detailed amendment and editing, to have effect from
10 December 2013; (b)
authorise
the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Strategy &
Infrastructure Planning) to: (i)
carry
out final detailed amendment and editing of the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste
Development Scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment; (ii)
take the
necessary steps to bring the revised Scheme into effect from 10 December 2013
and publish the revised Scheme, in accordance with Sections 15 and 16 of the
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended). Additional documents: Minutes: The County Council is preparing a new Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste
Local Plan. Cabinet considered the
Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme that sets out the programme
for the production of this plan and the planning policy documents (local development
documents) that will make up the plan. Councillor John Sanders,
Cabinet Member for Environment was pleased that the Council was still on target
for the date of December 2015. He referred to previous problems with the Plan
and the difficulties this could cause for the council. During discussion the
Chairman expressed his thankfulness that the previous plan had not been adopted
with its higher levels of extraction. Councillor Nimmo Smith in moving the recommendations outlined the role
that the Cabinet Advisory Group would play. RESOLVED: to (a)
approve
the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Development Scheme (Fifth Revision) 2013 at
Annex 1, subject to final detailed amendment and editing, to have effect from
10 December 2013; (b)
authorise
the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Strategy &
Infrastructure Planning) to: (i)
carry
out final detailed amendment and editing of the Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste
Development Scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment; (ii)
take the necessary
steps to bring the revised Scheme into effect from 10 December 2013 and publish
the revised Scheme, in accordance with Sections 15 and 16 of the Planning and
Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended). |
|
|
Forward Plan and Future Business Cabinet Member: All Contact Officer: Sue Whitehead, Committee Services
Manager (01865 810262) The Cabinet Procedure
Rules provide that the business of each
meeting at the Cabinet is to include “updating of the Forward Plan and proposals
for business to be conducted at the following meeting”. Items from the Forward Plan for the
immediately forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet appear in the Schedule at CA14. This includes any updated information
relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified
for inclusion in the next Forward Plan
update. The
Schedule is for noting, but Cabinet Members
may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they
would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan
update. The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings. Minutes: The Cabinet considered a
list of items for the immediately forthcoming
meetings of the Cabinet. RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings. |
|
|
Exempt Item Item 15 It is RECOMMENDED
that the public be excluded for the duration of item 15 in the Agenda since it
is likely that if they were present during those items there would be
disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A to the
Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and specified in relation to the
respective items in the Agenda and since it is considered that, in all the
circumstances of each case, the public interest in exemption outweighs the
public interest in disclosing the information. THE REPORT TO THE ITEM NAMED HAS NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC AND SHOULD BE
REGARDED AS ‘CONFIDENTIAL’ BY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE THEM. THIS IS FOR REASONS OF COMMERCIAL SENSITIVITY AND THE FINANCIAL
RISK TO THE COUNCIL IF THE CONTENTS ARE DISCLOSED. THIS ALSO MEANS THAT THE CONTENTS SHOULD NOT BE DISCUSSED WITH OTHERS AND NO COPIES SHOULD BE MADE. Minutes: RESOLVED: that the public be excluded for the duration of item 15 in the Agenda since it is likely that if they were present during those items there would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and specified in relation to the respective items in the Agenda and since it is considered that, in all the circumstances of each case, the public interest in exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. |
|
|
Dix Pit Contract Variation
Cabinet Member: Environment Forward Plan Ref: 2013/171 Contact: Andrew Pau, Strategic Manager, Waste & Transport Tel: (01865) 815867 Report by Director for Environment & Economy (CA15). Oxfordshire County Council has a contract with FCC Environment Ltd (FCC) for the disposal of municipal waste at Dix Pit landfill site near Stanton Harcourt. The contract also provides for the operation of the Dix Pit household waste recycling centre. From summer/autumn 2014 residual waste will be sent to the energy from waste facility at Ardley for treatment and therefore use of the landfill site under this contract will end. Discussions have taken place with FCC to determine the appropriate cost of closing the landfill and to reach an agreement to vary the contract to achieve this whilst securing the on-going provision of the household waste recycling centre. The report seeks approval for the settlement agreement reached in principle with FCC and for delegated authority for the Director for Environment and Economy, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment, to finalise the agreement and sign the contract variation. The information contained in the report and annexes is exempt in that it
falls within the following prescribed category: 3 – information relating to the financial or business affairs of
any particular person (including the authority holding that information) It is considered
that in this case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs
the public interest in disclosing the information, in that such disclosure
would distort the
proper process of free negotiations between the authority with another party for
the purposes described and would prejudice the position of the authority in
those negotiations and other negotiations of a similar nature in future. Minutes: The information contained in the report and annexes is exempt in that it
falls within the following prescribed category: 3 – information relating to the financial or
business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that
information) It is considered that in this case the public interest in maintaining
the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, in
that such disclosure would distort the proper process of free negotiations between the authority
with another party for the purposes described and would prejudice the position
of the authority in those negotiations and other negotiations of a similar
nature in future. Cabinet considered a report containing exempt information and gave approval for the settlement agreement reached in principle with FCC Environment Ltd and for the Director for Environment & Economy in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment to finalise the agreement and sign the contract variation. |