Venue: County Hall, Oxford, OX11ND
Contact: Sue Whitehead Tel: (01865) 810262; E-Mail: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
To confirm the minutes of the extraordinary meeting held on 7 September 2009 (CA3)) and the meeting on 15 September 2009 (CA3(b)) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: The
minutes of the meetings held on 7 September 2009 and 15 September 2009 were both
approved and signed subject to the following agreed amendment to Minute 85/09 (paragraph
4) of the15 September minutes: “Councillor
Waine replied that (i) the ‘Readiness
to Deliver’ document was quite clear regarding Transformation Strategy and he proceeded
to read out the relevant part of the document……” |
|||||||||
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes: The following requests to
address the meeting had been agreed:
|
|||||||||
|
Questions from Councillors Minutes: Councillor
Fooks had given notice of the following question to
the Deputy Leader of the Council: “The
recent move of CYP&F to County Hall was marred by lack of training of staff
in how to use the ICT and new telephone system.
Was adequate provision made for the training needed by these staff? How does the training budget of Oxfordshire
County Council compare with the training budgets of other local authorities?” Councillor
Robertson: The recent move of CYP&F staff to County Hall had
taken place as part of the County Council’s Better Offices Programme
with a package of help and support provided for such moves - including IT and
telephony. This had proved to be very effective in previous office moves. The
CYP&F relocation had unearthed some additional IT and telephony needs
and these had been quickly identified and measures put in place to
address them. Providing an ICT help desk in the County Hall reception area
was one example - affording some 1 on 1 support to individuals requiring it. With regard to the Council’s training budget, there
was a clear and robust Learning & Development (L&D) planning process in
place which captured and addressed L&D needs across the whole organisation and prioritised
delivery of appropriate solutions to meet those needs. This included investment
in ICT training. Our training budget benchmarked well against other local
authorities and rated above average in the latest Chartered Institute of
Personnel & Development (CIPD) survey. Supplementary
Question: Was
the Deputy Leader aware of problems of calls not being put through because of
the overuse of voice mail. Councillor Robertson: if that was
common practice he shared that concern and would discuss with relevant officers
how those problems could be addressed.
He would let have Counciillor Fooks have a full written response. |
|||||||||
|
Adult Social Care Inspection Cabinet Member:
Adult Services Forward Plan Ref: 2009/100 Contact: John Jackson, Director of Social & Community
Services Tel: (01865) 323572, Steve Thomas, Performance Information
Manager Tel: (01865) 323609 Report by
Director for Social & Community Services There will be a presentation from the Care Quality Commission on their recent
Independence, Wellbeing and choice inspection of social care services. Minutes: Sue
Talbot from the Care Quality Commission presented the findings of the recent
Independence, Wellbeing and Choice Inspection of social care services. Mrs Talbot outlined the role of the
Commission as the
independent regulator of all health and adult social care in England making
sure that high quality health and social care was provided for everyone,
whether that’s in hospital, in care homes, in people’s own homes, or elsewhere.
The Commission
concluded that with regard to; Safeguarding
adults Oxfordshire
was performing adequately. Improving
health and wellbeing for older people Oxfordshire
was performing well. Increased
choice and control for older people Oxfordshire
was performing well. Capacity to improve Promising. The Lead Inspector and Area Manager would now jointly monitor progress over the coming months with a formal review of progress against the action plan scheduled for 6 months (mid April). Interim reports of progress would also be shared. Also
attending were three members of the Adult services Scrutiny Committee -
Councillor Seale (Chairman), Councillor Skolar and
Councillor Hannaby. Councillor
Seale asked what Oxfordshire could do to ensure that the authority was moving
in the right direction particularly as the numbers of safeguarded people was
increasing. Mrs
Talbot advised that Oxfordshire had the key building blocks in place and that
would be important in taking performance forward. She suggested the need to
address duplication levels. Recognising
that partnership working was the way forward Councillor Skolar
suggested that as Oxfordshire was the lead authority in the region it would be
difficult take that any further forward. Mrs
Talbot suggested the need to assess gaps regarding safe discharge of patients. Councillor
Hannaby mentioned the importance of adequate
monitoring The
Director for Social & Community Services felt the inspection had been very
useful with a sound methodology which would help drive Oxfordshire’s
performance forward. Oxfordshire now
needed to plan to improve services based on this report and its
recommendations. Congratulating
County Council staff on their work Councillor Chapman highlighted the
importance of monitoring progress and proposed that the report be noted with a
further report on the formal review of progress to be submitted to the Cabinet
in 6 months. |
|||||||||
|
Financial Monitoring - October 2009 Cabinet Member: Finance & Property Forward Plan Ref: 2009/034 Contact: Kathy Wilcox, Principal Financial Manager (01865 323981) Report by Assistant Chief
Executive & Chief Finance Officer This is the
fifth financial monitoring report for the 2009/10 financial year and covers the
period up to the end of August 2009 for both revenue, balances, reserves and
capital. The report sets
out explanations where the forecast revenue outturn is significantly different
from the budget along with proposals to recover the position where appropriate. The in – year
Directorate forecast is an overspend of £3.251m. The reduction of £0.762m
compared to the forecast at the end of July largely relates to a change in the
forecast for Children, Young People and Families. The current
position for general balances is set out in Annex 5 and shows a forecast of
£14.088m. After taking into account the
forecast Directorate overspend, the consolidated revenue balances forecast is
£10.837m. The report also
includes an updated Capital Programme. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to: (a)
note
the report; (b)
approve
the virements as set out in Annex 2a; (c)
note
the updated transfer of excess inflation to the Efficiency Savings Reserve
(para 38); (d)
approve
the request for £0.078m added to balances earlier this year to be removed to
fund the transport capital programme
(para 40) and (e)
approve
the updated capital programme included at Annex 7. Additional documents:
Minutes: The
Cabinet received the fifth financial monitoring report for 2009/10 financial
year covering the period up to the end of August 2009 and noted the figure
£439.0m in line 9 of paragraph 37 should have read £439K. Councillor
Mitchell highlighted that there were few variations from previous months. There were still significant overspends in
place and the County Council faced difficult times to meet its
commitments. He moved the recommendations. Councillor
Chapman advised that she would be undertaking a review of out of county
placements. Councillor
Robertson complimented staff on progress made with regard to the Home to School
Transport budget . RESOLVED: (a)
note the report CA6; (b)
approve the virements as
set out in Annex 2a to the report CA6; (c)
note the updated
transfer of excess inflation to the Efficiency Savings Reserve (paragraph 38 of
the report CA6); (d)
approve the request for
£0.078m added to balances earlier this year to be removed to fund the transport
capital programme (paragraph 40 of the report CA6) and (e)
approve the updated
capital programme included at Annex 7 to the report CA6. |
|||||||||
|
Building Schools for the Future Cabinet Member: Leader Forward Plan Ref: 2009/126 Contact: Roy Leach, Lead Officer, School Organisation &
Planning Tel: (01865) 816458 Report by
Director for Children, Young People & Families Building
Schools for the Future (BSF) is a substantial national investment programme
intended to transform secondary school education. It has the potential to
deliver in the region of £600m of capital investment to Oxfordshire's schools.
The report provides an up to date account of progress made towards securing
entry to the national BSF programme, describes the next steps to be taken and
identifies a number of financial challenges which the Council and its schools
will need to address. For Oxfordshire to
be brought into the national BSF programme it is necessary for the County
Council to demonstrate that it is committed to a number of key principles: the
establishment of a Local Education Partnership; delivery of substantially
rebuilt schools through the Private Finance Initiative; adequate revenue
funding to support procurement; and securing sufficient resources to bridge any
'affordability gap' between the funding allocated and that required to deliver
the Council's and schools' visions for the transformation of education. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to: (a)
Confirm
it’s commitment to the BSF programme; (b)
Confirm
that it wishes officers to continue to seek to have Oxfordshire brought into
the national BSF programme as soon as possible and fully engage with all
relevant stakeholders and partners; (c)
Confirm
that, unless or until such time as the requirements change, it understands that
the default model for the delivery of BSF is through a Local Education
Partnership unless otherwise agreed with DCSF and Partnership for Schools
subject to value for money consideration; and (d)
Acknowledge
that, under the current regime, new schools delivered through the BSF programme
will be predominately procured through PFI and that refurbishments will be procured
through capital grant. Additional documents:
Minutes: Building Schools for the
Future (BSF) was a substantial national investment programme intended to
transform secondary school education with the potential to deliver in the region
of £600m of capital investment to Oxfordshire's schools. Cabinet considered a
report (CA6) providing an up to date account of progress made towards securing
entry to the national BSF programme, describing the next steps to be taken and
identifying a number of financial challenges which the Council and its schools
will need to address. The following amendment to
paragraph 29 was noted: Line 4 £3.4m to read £4.4m
and that the shortfall would occur over 2 years – 2014/15 and 2015/16 - and not
just the first year (2014/15) as stated in the report. Councillor Waine called for all schools to commit to this initiative
and stressed the need to achieve a BREEAM level of ‘very good’ as an absolute
minimum moving to excellent. He also
confirmed that sprinkler systems were provided in extensive/new build projects but
confirmed that it was not always feasible to provide those systems where less
extensive programmes of work were being undertaken. RESOLVED: (a) confirm the Cabinet’s commitment to the BSF programme; (b) confirm
that the Cabinet wished officers to continue to seek to have Oxfordshire
brought into the national BSF programme as soon as possible and fully engage
with all relevant stakeholders and partners; (c)
confirm that, unless or until such time as the requirements change, the
Cabinet understood that the default model for the delivery of BSF was through a
Local Education Partnership unless otherwise agreed with DCSF and Partnership
for Schools subject to value for money consideration; and (d)
acknowledge that, under the current regime, new schools delivered through the BSF programme
would be predominately procured through PFI and that refurbishments would be
procured through capital grant. |
|||||||||
|
St Nicholas CE Primary School, Marston Cabinet Member: Schools Improvement Forward Plan Ref: 2009/128 Contact: Barbara Chillman,
Principal Officer - School Organisation and Planning Tel:
(01865) 816459 Report by
Director for Children, Young People & Families St Nicholas CE Primary
School has a published admission number of 45 children. For September 2008, 57
parents chose the school as their first preference. Due to rising numbers
across Oxford City, 60 children have been admitted to the school in September 2009.
Primary Care Trust records and the annual census of local children in early
years settings show that the demand for places is likely to continue to be
above the planned admission number. Other nearby schools are also expected to
be full or nearly full, and pupil numbers across Oxford are expected to rise
further. The
report considers a proposal to increase the school admission number from 45 to
60, which has been the subject of an informal consultation in the Marston area.
A decision is sought as to whether to proceed to issuing a statutory notice to
expand the school, in accordance with The Education and Inspections Act 2006
(EIA 2006) and The School Organisation (Prescribed Alterations to Maintained
Schools)(England) Regulations 2007 (as amended by The School Organisation and
Governance (Amendments)(England) Regulations 2007 which came into force on 21
January 2008). The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to approve the publication of a statutory
notice for the expansion of St Nicholas CE Primary School, Marston. Additional documents: Minutes: Cabinet
considered a report (CA8) setting out a proposal to increase the school
admission number at St Nicholas CE Primary School, Marston from 45 to 60
following an informal consultation in the Marston area and a decision was now
required as to whether or not to proceed to issuing a statutory notice to
expand the school. Councillor
Altaf-Khan supported expansion but highlighted a
number of issues regarding traffic and highway repairs and called for an
investigation into the admission process in other schools in order to relieve
pressure on St Nicholas School. Councillor
Waine welcomed Councillor Altaf
Khan’s comments regarding expansion at the school but added that pressure points
for placements were not always places where numbers could be increased. He had no objection in principle to the
proposal but also referred to a number of issues including traffic levels,
highway repair and provision of a new entrance off Marston Road. Investigations were ongoing into the first
two but provision of an additional entrance was contrary to policy. There were also financial implications
attached to the capital works should the proposals be approved which would need
to be the subject of a future report. Councillor
Rose added that he would be happy to consider provision of a pedestrian
crossing but much of the road repair work would need to be undertaken by the
City Council as a Section 42 responsibility. RESOLVED: to approve the publication of a statutory notice for
the expansion of St Nicholas CE Primary School, Marston |
|||||||||
|
Report on the Property Portfolio Cabinet Member: Leader Forward Plant Ref: 2009/131 Contact: Mark Tailby, Assistant Head of Property Tel:
(01865) 816012 Report by Head
of Property This is the annual
report detailing the performance of the Council’s property portfolio from April
2008 to March 2009. The content of this
report will help inform the Corporate Asset Management Plan. The report
includes benchmarking information and targets for 2009/10. In
the summary, the report shows: • A
slight reduction in the number of fit for purpose properties to 41%, although
only one third of the portfolio was surveyed in 2008/09. • Capital receipts of £6,947,871 were achieved in year. • Total required maintenance (assessed need) increased by 4.4%
on 2007/08. Total spend on repairs and
maintenance reduced, although the percentage split between planned and
responsive maintenance has improved to 59% and 41% respectively. • 64% of properties perform better than typical in terms of
environmental performance – a slight reduction on 2007/08 largely attributable
to a particularly cold winter. • Performance indicators for capital
projects show the core consultant performing very well in terms of cost and
time predictability at the design stage, and in terms of cost predictability at
the construction stage. The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the report. Minutes: Cabinet
considered (CE9) the annual report detailing the Council’s property portfolio
from April 2008 to March 2009. Councillor
Armitage raised particular concern regarding poor
performance regarding lowering carbon dioxide emissions. Extreme weather conditions should be included
within the parameters for these targets and should not be used as an excuse
when performance was not achieved. He
urged the Cabinet to instruct operating divisions to prioritise this work. Councillor
Waine highlighted the anomaly which existed in
schools where every effort was made to reduce emissions yet there was an expectation
to increase usage of IT. RESOLVED: to note the report CA9 |
|||||||||
|
Quarter 1 Performance Management: April - June 2009 Cabinet Member: Leader Forward Plan Ref: 2009/074 Contact: Alexandra
Bailey, Corporate Performance and Review Manager Tel: (01865) 816384 Report by
County Council Management Team The report shows the council's performance in the four key areas of: customer, projects, finance, and people. Progress against targets is shown by directorate, including a summary of what is going well, what needs to develop, and what requires attention. This is the performance report for Q1 2009/2010. The Cabinet is
RECOMMENDED to note this report. Minutes: Cabinet
considered (CA10) the performance report for Q1 2009/10 covering the four key
areas of customer, projects, finance and people. Councillor
Fooks felt the report was interesting but lacked
detail. Highlighting a number of areas which needed attention such as appraisals,
safeguarding children, high number of children permanently excluded and roads
and footways she expressed particular concern regarding carbon dioxide
emissions. Councillor
Robertson advised that the report contained a number of annual red targets which
would not be reflected in Q1and referred to the tremendous amount of work going
on to achieve a uniformed approach between County Directorates and develop a
performance culture throughout the County Council. He moved the
recommendations. RESOLVED: to note the report |
|||||||||
|
Forward Plan and Future Business Cabinet Member: All Contact Officer: Sue Whitehead, Committee Services
Manager (01865 810262) The Cabinet Procedure
Rules provide that the business of each
meeting at the Cabinet is to include “updating of the Forward Plan and proposals
for business to be conducted at the following meeting”. Items from the Forward Plan for the
immediately forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet appear in the Schedule at CA. This includes any updated information
relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified
for inclusion in the next Forward Plan
update. The
Schedule is for noting, but Cabinet Members
may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they
would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update. The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings. Minutes: Cabinet
considered a list of items (CA10) for the immediately forthcoming meetings of the
Cabinet together with changes and additions set out in schedule of addenda. RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for forthcoming
meetings. |