Venue: The Town Hall, Banbury Town Council, Bridge Street, Banbury OX16 5Q
Contact: Sue Whitehead Tel: 07393 001213 Email: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Note: PLEASE NOTE VENUE - BANBURY TOWN HALL
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Alison Rooke and Councillor Adil Sadygov (Councillor Rebecca Breese substituting). |
|
|
To approve the minutes of the last meeting held on 4 July 2019 (HHOSC3 – to be circulated separately) and to receive information arising from them. Minutes: Subject to the following corrections the Minutes of the meeting held on 4 July 2019 were approved and signed as a correct record: Page 3 - Jessica Williams to be added as the further Pragma representative referred to amongst the attendees. Page 3, Item (a) 2nd paragraph – Reference to ‘Ally Green’ to be corrected to read ‘Jessica Williams’. Page 3, Item (a) 3rd paragraph – Second sentence to be amended to read: ‘Data indicated that the closure had led to higher levels of anxiety in the Horton General catchment area with families weighing up the fact of using the Midwife Led Unit at The Horton against the distance to the John Radcliffe Hospital.’ Page 3, Item (a) second bullet point – Reference to ‘Ms Mountford corrected to read ‘Ms Mills’. Page 3, Item (a) third bullet point – Fourth sentence to be corrected to read: ‘Anxiety around the decision-making was higher in the Horton General Hospital catchment. |
|
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes: The Chairman had agreed the following requests to address the meeting: Victoria Prentis MP Cllr Eddie Reeves Rt Hon Sir Tony Baldry DL Cllr Andrew McHugh Cllr Rosie Herring - SNC Cllrs Jacqui Harris - SDC Keith Strangwood, Chairman KTHG Victoria Prentis
MP Victoria Prentis MP thanked the members of the Committee for their
efforts and thanked mothers for their powerful evidence to the Committee. Speaking for the whole area Victoria Prentis MP stated that they were
furious at the recommendations but would not give up. Needs in the area had not
diminished since 2008 and there had been population growth and increased
traffic congestion. It was not that local people distrusted the service offered
at Oxford but simply that it was too far away. She expressed shock that her
traffic survey was the only one available and highlighted the experience of
people travelling on average 1 hour 40 minutes to The John Radcliffe Hospital
(JR) whilst in labour. Victoria Prentis MP was encouraged by the suggestion of an annual review
(chaired by herself) and by discussions on working together to apply for
funding for essential rebuilding. She expressed her displeasure that over the
last three years no applications had been made. Councillor Eddie Reeves Councillor Eddie Reeves, County Councillor for Banbury Calthorpe, which
included the Horton Hospital, stated that this was the fourth time he had
spoken in the last two years and there had not been a lot of change in that
time. The de facto downgrading of The Horton was on the cards. The public
consultation given the manner of it was consultation only in a very elastic
sense. What remained as a fact was the geography of the area. The Committee had
heard the harrowing testimonies in December and Councillor Reeves felt that the
OCCG and OUHT had not engaged meaningfully with the evidence. The cynicism felt
by local people due to past experience had not been
addressed. Local people believed that poor administrative decisions were being
presented as good clinical decisions. He asked that no-one be under any
illusion about the strength of feeling. It had not abated. Sir Tony Baldry DL Sir Tony Baldry DL, speaking against the recommendations made a number of points: ·
He urged
the Committee to refer the decision back to the Independent Reconfiguration
Panel. He referred
back to the decision of the Independent Reconfiguration Panel in 2008
which had not supported the Trust’s proposals to reconfigure paediatric,
gynaecological and obstetric services because they failed to provide an
accessible or improved service for local people. Since then nothing had changed
except the growth in the population in the area. · He questioned what type of provision the Horton Hospital was now providing. Was it a general hospital or a hospital at all or was it just a random collection of services. In 2008 it had been described as a General Hospital but looking now it would not necessarily be considered the case. He asked the Trust and OCCG to set out ... view the full minutes text for item 23/19 |
|
|
Responding to the IRP and Secretary of State recommendations The CCG and OUHFT to report
to the Horton HOSC, in line with their timetable, on the recommendation to be
made to the CCG Board (on the 26th of September) on the future of obstetrics
at the Horton General Hospital. The paper accompanying this item will be published as an addenda to the papers on the 16th of September Additional documents:
Minutes: The following attendees were at the table:
Lou Patten, Chief Executive OCCG; Dr Bruno Holthof,
Chief Executive OUH and Professor Meghana Pandit, Medical Director, OUH. In addition,
Veronica Miller, OUH and Catherine Mountford, OCCG came to the table to respond
to specific points made. The following statements were made and are
set out in full: Lou
Patten ‘At the start of this programme the IRP
asked OCCG to do three things: 1.
To fully understand current and future demand
for maternity services, taking into account housing/population growth across
the wider area of north Oxfordshire, south Northamptonshire and south
Warwickshire. 2.
To take a fresh look at the options, to
thoroughly review the options previously included and to include any additional
options identified. 3.
To clarify any potential co-dependencies of
services linked to obstetrics at the Horton. In delivering this
programme we have worked with stakeholders including those from north
Oxfordshire, south Warwickshire and south Northamptonshire. We have been open
and shared information publically at every stage. We
set out our plan at the outset, agreed by the Joint HOSC, and have reported
progress at every one of your seven previous meetings. The process has been
thorough and complicated at times as we have got into the complex detail of
staffing models, recruitment, patient experience, clinical safety and national
guidance. OCCG have received
written confirmation from NHSEI that they are assured that the process we have
followed has delivered what was asked of us and this letter is published on
OCCG website. We have seen the JHOSC
Chair’s addendum in response to our published Board paper and note several
areas that require clarification or correction; whilst we may have the
opportunity to go through this today, we have prepared a written response that
will be passed to the Chair today and made available on our public website on
Friday morning. Most importantly, I
need to ask that one particular point is retracted immediately about smaller
hospitals that suggested other hospitals might lie or stretch the truth. I
don’t believe this was accurately reported. Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group
understands the recommendation set out in our Board paper will be hugely
disappointing for all those who want to see obstetrics return to the Horton.
However, although a recommendation has been made, a final decision is still to
be discussed and made by the OCCG Board on 26 September. It is really important for the JHOSC to note
that the recommended option if agreed will be a very different decision to that
taken by the CCG Board in 2016. There are a number of differences that I wish
to point out. · In March 2018 the CCG Board overturned the decision to consult on the removal of A&E and Paediatrics; these services will stay at the Horton. System Leaders agreed that the Horton provides a significant suite of services to the people of Banbury & surrounding ... view the full minutes text for item 24/19 |
|
|
Update on activity of the
committee between meetings Additional documents: |