53 Establishment Review - May 2010
PDF 65 KB
Cabinet Member: Deputy Leader
Forward Plan Ref:
2010/012
Contact: Sue Corrigan, Strategic HR Manager Tel:
(01865) 810280
Report by Head of Human
Resources (CA7).
This report gives an update on activity
since the implementation of the
Establishment Review and associated Recruitment Approval process on 1
August 2005. It provides detail on the overall objectives of the review and
summarises progress made against the targets which were agreed to ensure
delivery of those objectives. Details of the agreed establishment figure at 31
March 2010 in terms of Full Time Equivalents is provided, together with the
detailed staffing position at 31 March 2010. These are shown in the report by
directorate and service area.
The report also provides information on
current activity and in addition there is information on grant funded posts and
the cost of those vacancies which are being covered by agency staff.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) note the report;
(b) confirm that the Establishment
Review continues to meet the Cabinet’s requirements in reporting and managing
staffing numbers.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet considered a report (CA7) that gave an update on activity since the implementation of
the Establishment Review and associated Recruitment Approval process on 1
August 2005. Details of the agreed establishment figure at 31 March 2010 in
terms of Full Time Equivalents was provided, together with the detailed
staffing position at 31 March 2010. The report also contained information on
grant funded posts and those vacancies which are being covered by agency staff
and at what cost.
Councillor Jean Fooks, Opposition Deputy Leader, stated
that she was still unclear about the true vacancy and agency staff figures; suggested
that there was a danger of double counting with regard to long term sickness
and that it might be useful to have a column showing unfilled posts.
Councillor Robertson responded to the comments made
and in particular stressed that the balance between agency and permanent staff was
always monitored to ensure value for money. He noted that any vacancies held for
more than six months had to be justified for the post to be retained. He added
that he was pleased to see the reduction in advertising costs and commented that
he felt that the report was useful and that the information was now being reported
earlier.
RESOLVED: to:
(a) note the report;
(b) confirm
that the Establishment Review continues to meet the Cabinet’s requirements in
reporting and managing staffing numbers.
.