7 Bus Service Subsidy
PDF 360 KB
Forward Plan Ref: 2009/226
Contact: John Wood, Assistant Public
Transport Officer(ITU) (01865 815802)
11:50am
Report
by Head of Transport (TDC10E)
Minutes:
RESOLVED: that the public be excluded for the
duration of item 10E since it is likely that if they were present during that
item there would be disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of
Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and specified below
in relation to that item and since it is considered that, in all the
circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption
outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information on the grounds set
out in that item.
Councillor
Fooks welcomed the proposed support for Service 218
and Service 17 but asked whether further consideration could be given to
adopting PT/02B Option 1 to provide a service in the return direction. She
expressed regret at the loss of Service 206.
Councillor
Sanders thanked officers for their work on Service 16 and welcomed proposed
support for continuation of the Service.
Councillor
Turner asked for clarification regarding the effects of inflation on the County
Council’s bus subsidy budget and referred to the following specific services:
Service
4 and 4B reiterating comments from
Councillor Janet Godden.
Service
49 improve services to Kings Copse
Service
12 routeing
Service
9 reiterating support from Councillor Roz Smith for services to Risinghurst.
Service
X41 he understood that there had been no consultation with either of the Parish
Council public transport representatives and Benson, Ewelme
and RAF Benson had not been aware of the change until the timetable had been
produced.
Officers
confirmed that proposals for Service 49A would mean adjustments to the days
when the service ran but would not result in any loss of service for Kings
Copse.
Service
206 (Waterways) usage of that service was nil and the only real option would
have been to procure a bespoke service which would not have been affordable.
Service
17 – the current level of service would be maintained but Option 1 was not
sustainable in terms of price. Officers
could investigate provision again but they recommended that the Cabinet Member
proceed as recommended for the time being.
Service
X41 – the withdrawal of the evening X41 had been a commercial decision by
Thames Travel and therefore they were under no obligation to consult.
With
regard to inflation officers advised that bus companies were paid an inflationary
figure on the anniversary of the contract award and the County’s Financial
Officer included an estimated inflationary figure. They were confident that
there would be enough to meet the County’s commitments despite figures for bus
inflation in previous years running at a higher rate.
The
Cabinet Member thanked officers for their work in this review of subsidised bus
services.
(a)
approve subsidy for the services described in the
report CMDT10E on the basis of the tender prices (and the periods of time) as
set out in Supplementary Exempt Annex 2;
(b) record that in the Cabinet Member for Transport’s opinion the decisions made in (a) above were urgent in that any delay likely to be caused ... view the full minutes text for item 7