4 Devolution White Paper and Response
PDF 256 KB
Forward Plan Ref: 2024/375
Contact: Helen Mitchell, Head of Public Affairs and Strategy, helen.mitchell@oxfordshire.gov.uk
Report by Chief Executive (CA4).
The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to:
1. Note the publication of the Devolution
White Paper and the emerging impacts for Oxfordshire County Council and local
government in Oxfordshire;
2. Agree the response to Government for issue
by 10 January 2025 (as set out in Appendix 1);
3. Request that Government places Oxfordshire
into a ‘fast track’ programme to progress local government reorganisation
ambitions first and continue to work with partners on a future Mayoral
Strategic Authority;
4. Express to Government the County Council’s
significant concerns in postponing ordinary elections in 2025, but that it
would accept a postponement if it can commit to the most ambitious timescale of
elections to a new shadow Council/Councils in May 2026.
Additional documents:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
This decision is not subject to Scrutiny call-in.
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed members, public speakers and observers to the
meeting. She began her remarks by
offering the Council’s congratulations to Rob MacDougall, Chief Fire Officer and
Director of Community Safety, who had been awarded the King’s Fire Service
Medal in the New Year Honour’s List.
Cabinet had before it a report setting out a proposed response to the
Government’s Devolution White Paper published on Monday 16 December 2024.
The White Paper set out the most significant reforms to local government
since the Local Government Act 1972. A
significant element of the Paper progresses the English devolution agenda which
commenced in 2009, providing powers to create Combined Authorities that would
enable Councils to collaborate more formally to accelerate inclusive and
sustainable economic growth.
Councillor Liz Leffman, Leader of the Council introduced the report
which provided an overview of the government's White Paper published on 16
December, and thanked Helen Mitchell, Head of Public Affairs and Strategy and
other officers for their work in preparing the report. The Leader commented she
was not of the view that Oxfordshire was in a position
to be part of the Devolution priority programme as there was a need for further
discussions with neighbouring authorities on agreeing definite proposals for a
strategic combined authority and local government reorganisation.
Cabinet was then addressed by a number of
speakers including members of the public and the leaders of the District
Councils in Oxfordshire.
The following points were made by the speakers:-
·
The importance of moving forward with devolution and
reorganisation, suggesting a broader geography for a mayoral combined authority
and the need for a larger devolved economic powers
within the Southeast of England.
·
A member of the public referred the to the drawbacks
of the current two-tier system of local government and concerns around the use
of Growth Deal funds for the Oxpens Bridge project
·
Some of the District Council Leaders were of the view that
priority should be given to moving forward with the combined strategic
authority first and that further detailed discussions were required on any
proposals for structural reform of local government in Oxfordshire
·
One member of the County Council expressed concern about the
haste of the proposals, the lack of genuine consultation and the potential
risks of the introduction of large unitary authorities
·
Another member provided historical context on the previous
reorganisation attempts in Oxfordshire, and supported the report’s
recommendations emphasising transparency in the decision-making process
Members then discussed the report and
recommendations. The Head of Public Affairs
and Strategy answered a number of questions and
explained the current status of the Government’s devolution process and
timelines.
During discussion, several members raised concerns about
the potential postponement of the County Council elections in May 2025 and the
need to maintain the normal democratic processes during any period of
reorganisation. There was general support for moving forward at pace with
devolution and reorganisation to avoid uncertainty for all stakeholders
including the Council’s workforce.
RESOLVED to:
a) Note the publication of the Devolution White Paper ... view the full minutes text for item 4