129 Parking Standards for New Developments
PDF 398 KB
Cabinet Member: Travel & Development Strategy
Forward Plan Ref: 2022/105
Contact: Jason Sherwood, Growth Manager South & Vale, 07795 684708
Report by Director of Transport & Infrastructure (CA10).
Oxfordshire County Council’s Local Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP), adopted July 2022, outlines a clear vision to deliver a net-zero Oxfordshire transport and travel system by 2040. One of the policies within the LTCP that will be key to supporting this vision is realised is Policy 33, which sets out how the council is seeking to reduce and restrict car parking availability while also creating more attractive places for residents to live and work in.
The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to adopt and implement the revised ‘Parking Standards for
New Developments’ as a formal supplementary document to the Local Transport and
Connectivity Plan (LTCP).
Additional documents:
Decision:
Amended recommendations were agreed as follows:
To adopt and implement the revised ‘Parking
Standards for New Developments’ as amended in the Addenda as a formal
supplementary document to the Local Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP).
Councillors
Enright, Gant and Sudbury to conduct a review with the
relevant officers on issues raised by the scrutiny committee and bring back an
update to a future Cabinet meeting before the end of this year.
Minutes:
Cabinet had before it the following:
In the agenda pack:
· Cabinet report on ‘Parking Standards for New Developments’ with annexes
· Report from the Place Overview & Scrutiny Committee
In the (first) Addenda
· An addendum to the Cabinet report
· The latest draft of the “Parking Standards for New Developments” document (Annex 1)
In Addenda 2
· An overview of research
Before considering the item, the Chair agreed to the following requests to speak.
City Councillor Emily Kerr criticised the
summary of research in the papers. She
stated that there was decades of evidence to show a
strong correlation between car ownership and availability of parking with the
number of car journeys. She believed
that the proposals were not in line with the targets adopted in the Local
Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP) adopted by the Council.
Councillor Charlie Hicks believed that there
had been little movement on the evidence or targets since the Cabinet meeting last
month. He did not accept the assertion
in the reports that the evidence was not clear.
The evidence should be established first and then it was possible to
have a debate on values. There were
better examples elsewhere of car-free developments both in-city and
edge-of-city.
Councillor Ian Middleton supported the aims
of the standards but called for a more holistic approach. Particularly with smaller developments,
limiting the number of parking spaces just pushed the problem onto adjoining
streets and verges. There was a need for
it to be done alongside waiting restrictions and proper enforcement.
Councillor Robin Bennett stated that areas
like Berinsfield and Culham were regarded as villages
but, with new development, were effectively becoming the size of towns. However, they had no Controlled Parking Zones
and really required similar policies to edge-of-city developments.
Councillor Duncan Enright, Cabinet Member for
Travel & Development Strategy, thanked Members, Officers and the councils
for their input on this issue. The proposals
were by no means encouraging cars and were in line with policy. Car usage was the primary target not
ownership.
The proposals would remove the principle of
having a minimum number of parking spaces.
Along with improvements in active travel infrastructure, the provision
of transport hubs and car clubs will mean that people will be happy to use cars
less.
Councillor Enright proposed an amendment to
the recommendations that he along with Councillors Gant and Sudbury conduct a
review with officers and bring back further changes soon to strengthen the
policy.
Cabinet Members made a
number of observations:
·
The
proposal to further strengthen the document was welcomed.
·
Improved
public transport and active travel can be provided to edge-of-city
developments.
·
There
were huge advantages to having fewer cars including reduction of accidents.
·
The
proposal was better than the old policy and it was important to adopt it to set
a line in the sand.
·
The
biggest influence on car ownership was wealth.
Councillor Tim Bearder left the meeting.
Councillor Duncan Enright moved the amended
recommendations. Councillor Miller
seconded and they were agreed.
RESOLVED:
To adopt and implement the revised ‘Parking ... view the full minutes text for item 129
Parking Standards for New Developments
Cabinet Member: Travel & Development Strategy
Forward Plan Ref: 2022/105
Contact: Jason Sherwood, Growth Manager South & Vale, 07795 684708
Report by Director of Transport & Infrastructure (CA11).
Oxfordshire County Council’s Local
Transport and Connectivity Plan (LTCP), adopted July 2022, outlines a clear
vision to deliver a net-zero Oxfordshire transport and travel system by 2040.
One of the policies within the LTCP that will be key to supporting this vision
is realised is Policy 33, which sets out how the council is seeking to reduce
and restrict car parking availability while also creating more attractive
places for residents to live and work in.
The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to adopt and implement the revised ‘Parking Standards for
New Developments’ as a formal supplementary document to the Local Transport and
Connectivity Plan (LTCP).
Additional documents:
Decision:
Item deferred to Cabinet on 18 October 2022.
Minutes:
The Chair proposed to defer this item to the Cabinet meeting on 18 October 2022 to allow further work on the targets for this very important policy as part of the aim of reaching Net Zero by 2050. She believed the issue should be discussed by the Place Overview & Scrutiny Committee and she was in contact with the Chair to try to organise a meeting of the scrutiny committee before October Cabinet.
This was agreed.