56 Witney - Various Locations - Proposed Waiting Restrictions
PDF 3 MB
Forward Plan Ref: 2021/017
Contact: Hugh Potter, Group Manager – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 998704/James Wright, Traffic & Traffic Schemes Technical Officer
Report by Corporate Director, Environment and Place (CMDE12).
The report
presents responses received to a statutory consultation on proposed waiting
restrictions on various roads in Witney to address hazardous or obstructive
parking. Funding for the proposals has been provided by developers of adjacent
land in respect of the proposals at Avenue Two and from the Oxfordshire County
Council revenue budget in respect of the other locations.
The Cabinet Member for Environment
is RECOMMENDED to approve waiting restrictions at:
a)
Corndell
Gardens
b)
The Newland area
c)
The Crofts
d)
Avenue Two
as advertised.
Decision:
Approved
(b)
officers asked to explain rationale for decision and confirm that as much on
street parking as possible had been provided on Newlands Road with the resident
at 144 Newlands,
(a
& c) officers asked to confirm details of the proposals on site and discuss
wider issues with local housing developer.
Minutes:
The Cabinet
Member for Environment considered (CMDE12) responses received to a statutory
consultation on proposed waiting restrictions on various roads in Witney to
address hazardous or obstructive parking. Funding for the proposals had been
provided by developers of adjacent land in respect of the proposals at Avenue
Two and from the Oxfordshire County Council revenue budget in respect of the
other locations.
Steve Harris set out the history
to this application with regard to The Crofts which in his opinion had been wrongly
approved and strongly advising a site visit to appreciate the loss of 2 spaces,
the planning application and safety of this junction. Regarding Corndell
Gardens he set out a number of points and objection. At this point in time there was
no pressure on on-street parking at Corndell Gardens with no one parking on the
area where the double yellow lines were proposed. During the construction of
Old Orchard Court vehicles associated with the construction had parked there on
regular occasions but that had not been the case since December 2020 and had
not noticed anyone else parked there either when they were on site 5 days a
week. The residents of Corndell Gardens had made a problem out of something that
might happen in the future. There was no
evidence that parking in Corndell Gardens iwa a problem. Corndell Gardens. He
was also concerned on behalf of the future residents of Old Orchard Court that
if the double yellow lines were implemented then additional vehicles from
either Corndell Gardens or Old Orchard Court requiring parking would have no alternative
but to park in front of the entrance to Old Orchard Court causing obstruction
to the residents of the 18 flats where there were no double yellow lines.
Surely double yellow lines there would be more appropriate and only once the
apartments were fully occupied and a full survey carried out. He believed the
most important element was to reinstate the highway whether it be pedestrian or
vehicle which would then allow any overflow parking requirements to be widely
available to all.
Kelly Harris spoke in support of removal of the single yellow line from the corner of Church Lane to past the Griffin Pub. However, they were disappointed that after 5 years of talks and tribunals with WODC around parking issues at their in Newland, Witney that the line removal proposal was now not being extended to include their property. This situation been ongoing since Sept 2016 had caused much unnecessary stress and it was literally a daily nightmare to find a parking space close to their house. Not only affected residents but staff from the industrial estate were all fighting daily for a very small number of street parking spaces in King Fisher Crescent opposite or the lay-by starting at The Carpenters. Including the lining up to our property would relieve Newlands parking issues for us plus 2 of our neighbours. Having moved into the property in 2009 there were for the first 7 years ... view the full minutes text for item 56