19 Youth Opportunity Fund
PDF 324 KB
Cabinet Member: Local
Communities
Forward Plan Ref: 2019/192
Contact: Fulya Markham, Senior Strategic Commissioning Officer Tel: 07776 997956
Report by Corporate Director of Children’s Services (CA10).
The Youth Opportunity Fund was
introduced by Cabinet in 2019 to increase opportunities for young people across
Oxfordshire. This fund aims to support voluntary
and community organisations to establish new youth opportunities and extend
existing activities to additional sessions, areas or groups of young people
between the ages of 11 to 18 (25 where young people have special educational
needs). The total value of the Fund is £1 million for two years from the date
of award, and up to a maximum of £70,000 per application across the two years.
Once the available resource is used the Youth Opportunity Fund will be closed.
Following the application process, as per the agreed cross-party decision-making process, the cross-party panel reviewed the applications and assessed them against grant criteria.
This paper sets out the final cross-party panel recommendations for allocation of the Youth Opportunity Fund for decision by Cabinet.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED
to:
(a)
award a total of £999,800 (details can be
found at Annex 2); and
(b)
close the Youth Opportunity Fund.
Decision:
Recommendations agreed
Minutes:
The Youth
Opportunity Fund was introduced by Cabinet in 2019 to increase opportunities
for young people across Oxfordshire. Following the application process, as per
the agreed cross-party decision-making process, the cross-party panel reviewed
the applications and assessed them against grant criteria.
Cabinet had before them a report that set out the final cross-party panel recommendations for allocation of the Youth Opportunity Fund for decision by Cabinet.
Councillor Gill Sanders, local councillor for Rose Hill &
Littlemore, thanked the cross-party panel for their work and for supporting the
bid from the Rose Hill Junior Youth Club. The funding to this Group and other
successful groups would be put to good use. She sympathised with the
unsuccessful bidders and referred to the funding agreed at full Council in
February to develop an up to date assessment of need and of the services young
people in Oxfordshire want and need; to identify whether these services are
currently being delivered and to investigate future service delivery options to
meet that need. She hoped that this might be a start to replace those services
lost as a result of cuts to local government funding.
Councillor Liz Brighouse, speaking as the Opposition Leader and local
councillor for Churchill & Ley Valley thanked all those on the cross-party
working panel for sifting through all the 95 applications. The volume of
applications was an indication of the need to recognise that youth work in
Oxfordshire needed to be funded. Organisations were struggling and the grant
funding would make a difference.
Referring to her local project it was recommended for funding. In the
past her area had had a full-time youth worker who had supported a number of
volunteers in addition to young people on the street. There was a video
available of the work done. She hoped that some of that legacy could be picked
up again.
In thanking Cabinet for the money, she stressed that it was important to
learn from how the money was used, with schemes being well evaluated.
Councillor Richard Webber, local councillor for Sutton Courtenay & Marcham,
spoke as someone who had served on other panels and was fully aware of the
difficult task they faced and the heavy time commitment. There were 71
unsuccessful bids, almost all doing wonderful work. Many of these groups did
not understand why they were falling short. No one had heard why they were
unsuccessful. In his area the DAMASCUS Youth Project was unsuccessful, but he
was speaking for all those unsuccessful groups. Lack of funding could damage
groups’ further opportunities to attract funding as they would be unable to
demonstrate council support.
Councillor Webber added that the fund seemed to be about innovation with
no support for sustainability. He hoped that the Council budget decision
referred to by Councillor Sanders would be carried out to understand
sustainability issues.
Councillor Webber suggested that Cabinet was being asked to ratify the decisions without all the information in front of them. He also queried why the Fund had taken so long to ... view the full minutes text for item 19